Abstract
Britons traveled to Wembley as individuals or as members of family groups, workplaces and businesses, civic associations, choral societies, schools and church groups, women’s clubs, girl guides and scout brigades, and in many other combinations; bridal couples celebrated their honeymoons at Wembley, others combined a trip to Wembley with a visit to the Cenotaph, and some visited Parliament and other popular London sites. The British Empire Exhibition came after a long period of war, social upheaval, and economic dislocation, and for many Britons a visit to Wembley was a welcome moment of lightheartedness and release. In Dundee, Scotland, for example, newspapers reported a popular enthusiasm dubbed “Wembley fever” as employers, newspapers, and patriotic societies promoted the exhibition, while steamship lines and railroads offered discounts and special excursion trains. Local newspapers reported “huge crowds lined up in front of the stations” waiting for trains to Wembley, a distance of 500 miles away; inside the night trains “hilarity and excitement reached fever height” and “corridors thronged until well into the morning with laughing, jostling trippers.”1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Melanie Smith and Greg Richards (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Cultural Tourism (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013), 2.
John K. Walton, “British Tourism between Industrialization and Globalization,” in Hartmut Berghoff et al. (eds), The Making of Modern Tourism: The Cultural History of the British Experience, 1600–2000 (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2002), 109–31;
Jill Hamilton, Thomas Cook, The Holiday-Maker (Stroud: Phoenix Mill, 2005), 1–5.
Department of Overseas Trade, “Report on HMG Participation at the British Empire Exhibition,” (1927), National Archives, PRO BT 60/14/2; East African Standard, December 5, 1925.
Stephen Wearing and Simon Darcy, “Inclusion of the ‘Othered’ in Tourism,” Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal 3, no. 2 (2011): 18–34.
Marianna Torgovnick, Gone Primitive: Savage Intellects, Modern Lives (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), 192.
Modris Eksteins, Rites of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989);
William R. Everdell, The First Moderns: Profiles in the Origins of Twentieth-Century Thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).
Stephen Bourne, Black in the British Frame: The Black Experience in British Film and Television (London: Continuum, 2001);
J. S. Bratton (ed.), Acts of Supremacy: The British Empire and the Stage 1790–1930 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991).
Lucy Bland, “White Women and Men of Colour: Miscegenation Fears in Britain after the Great War,” Gender and History 17, no. 1 (2005): 29–61.
John Seeley, Expansion of England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), 66.
Jonathan Woodham, “Images of Africa and Design at the British Empire Exhibition between the Wars,” Journal of Design History 2, no. 1 (1989): 15–33.
Leon Gordon, White Cargo: A Play of the Primitive (Boston: Four Seas, 1925), 29.
W. F. Hutchinson, “Nigeria’s Share at Wembley,” in African World Special Supplement, April 30, 1924.
See J. B. Danquah, Akan Laws and Customs (London: G. Routledge, 1928);
J. E. Casely Hayford, Gold Coast Native Institutions (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1903).
J. B. Danquah, Gold Coast Leader, reprinted in West Africa, August 30, 1924, 912.
Colonial Office, West African Correspondence Vol. 3 (October—December 1924) National Archives, PRO CO 554/64.
Kitoyi Ajasa, “The New Nigeria,” Nigerian Pioneer, June 13, 1924.
Donald Maxwell, Wembley in Colour: Being Both an Impression and a Memento of the British Empire Exhibition (London: Longmans, Green, 1924), 58.
Ezra Manela, The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anti-Colonial Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
British Empire Exhibition, The Weekly Bulletin of Empire Study (London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1924), 292.
H. V. Lanchester, “Town Planning in India,” in Town Planning Institute Proceedings of Conference and Record of Exhibition Held at the British Empire Exhibition (London: Percy Laud Humpheries, 1924), 6–10.
Swapna Banerjee-Guha, “Urban Development Process in Bombay: Planning for Whom?” in Sujata Patel and Alice Thorner (eds), Bombay: Metaphor For Modern India (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1995), 100–120;
Mariam Dossal, Imperial Designs and Indian Realities: The Planning of Bombay City 1845–1875 (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1991).
Mrinalini Sinha, “Refashioning Mother India Feminism and Nationalism in Late-Colonial India,” Feminist Studies 26, no. 3 (Autumn 2000): 623–44;
Partha Chatterjee, “The Nationalist Resolution of the Women’s Question,” in Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid (eds), RecastingWomen: Essays in Indian Colonial History (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1990), 233–53;
Mrinalini Sinha, “Suffragism and Internationalism: The Enfranchisement of British and Indian Women under an Imperial State,” in Fletcher, Mayhall, and Levine (eds), Women’s Suffrage in the British Empire: Citizenship, Nation, and Race (London: Routledge, 2000);
Mrinalini Sinha, Specters of Mother India: The Global Restructuring of an Empire (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006).
Copyright information
© 2013 Daniel Stephen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stephen, D. (2013). Imperialism for the People. In: The Empire of Progress. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325129_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325129_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45919-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32512-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)