Abstract
Over the last 50 years, the European Union (EU) has been an incredible workshop for research. Scholars have produced numerous studies on both the European integration process and the EU. However, the main body of theoretical research has largely been focused on the Council, the Commission and the Court of Justice. Indeed, the Commission, a “hybrid” institution combining agenda setting and control powers, has drawn much attention from specialists, who have seen it as the most original part of the European project. Since its creation in the 1980s, the Court has also been a focal point for researchers. The considerable impact of its initial decisions and the mysterious veil enshrouding its deliberations have literally fascinated political scientists. International Relations (IR) specialists, for their part, have been more inclined to study the Council, as the locus for the defense of national interests. Conversely, the European Parliament (EP), regarded as the most banal component of the Union’s political system, has remained rather neglected by scholars, all the more so as studies have mainly focused on its somewhat lackluster characteristics. Though there has recently been renewed interest in the activities of the EP, scholars have privileged the study of European elections, 1 the analysis of how the EP exerts its powers2 and the way in which majorities and coalitions are made and unmade. 3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Reif, K., “National Elections Cycles and European Elections, 1979 and 1984”, Electoral Studies, vol. 3, no 3, 1984, pp. 244–255.
Judge, D. and Earnshaw, D., “Weak Parliament Influence? A Study of the Environment Committee of the European Parliament”, Government and Opposition, vol. 29, no 2, 1994, pp. 262–276
Tsebelis, G., “The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda-Setter”, American Polí tical Science Review, vol. 88, no 1, March 1994, pp. 128–142
Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G., “Agenda-Setting, Vetoes and the EU’s Co-decision Procedure”, Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 3, no 3, 1997, pp. 74–92.
Hix, S. and Lord, C., Polí tical Parties in the European Union, London, Macmillan Press, 1997
Christiansen, T. and Reh, C., Constitutionalizing the European Union, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Rosamond, B., Theories ofEuropean Integration, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000
Lequesne, C., Comment penser l’Union européenne?, in Marie-Claude Smouts (ed.), Les nouvelles relations internationales: pratiques et thé ories, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 1998
Christiansen, T., “The Role of Supranational Actors in EU Treaty Reform”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 9, no 1, 2002, pp. 33–53.
Rittberger, B., “The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 41, no 2, 2003, pp. 203–225.
Köning, T. and Slapin, J., “Bringing Parliaments Back In. The Sources of Powers in European Treaty Negotiation”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 16, no 3, 2004, pp. 357–394.
Warleigh-Lack, A. and Van Langenhove, L., “Introduction. Rethinking EU Studies: The Contribution of Comparative Regionalism”, Journal of European Integration, vol. 32, no 6, 2010, pp. 541–562.
Moravcsik, A. and Nicolaïdis, K., “Keynote Article: Federal Ideals and Constitutional Realities in the Treaty of Amsterdam”, Journal of Common Market Studies: Annual Review, vol. 36, September 1998, pp. 13–38.
Moravcsik, A., The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, London, University College London, 1998, p. 376.
Alter, K. J., “Who are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice”, International Organization, vol. 52, no 1, 1998, pp. 121–147.
Christiansen, T., “The Role of Supranational Actors in EU Treaty Reform”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 9, no 1, 2002, p. 45.
Costa, O., La contribution de la composante ‘Parlement europé en’ à la Convention européenne, Politique européenne, no 13, Spring 2004, pp. 21–41.
Christiansen, T., Falkner, G. and Jorgensen, K. E., “Theorizing EU Treaty Reform: Beyond Diplomacy and Bargaining”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 9, no 1, 2002, p. 23.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Olivier Costa and Nathalie Brack
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Costa, O., Brack, N. (2013). The Role of the European Parliament in Europe’s Integration and Parliamentarization Process. In: Costa, O., Dri, C., Stavridis, S. (eds) Parliamentary Dimensions of Regionalization and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322746_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322746_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45853-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32274-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)