Two Invisible Hands: Family, Markets, and the Adam Smith Problem

  • Lauren K. Hall
Part of the Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics book series (AIEE)


Smith scholarship is split on whether the apparent conflict between self-interest in the Wealth of Nations (WN) and sympathy in the Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS) indicates an intractable problem or is merely the result of a misunderstanding of Smith’s overall system. This chapter is written as a response both to the believers in das Adam Smith Problem and to those who offer a way of pulling the two texts together. In the first place, I argue that das Adam Smith Problem highlights the complexity of Smith’s body of work and his belief that the motives for behavior in the private sphere will be different from and sometimes conflict with the rules of the public sphere. Second, I argue that the higher-level economic order relies fundamentally on norms of behavior and rules of conduct that are nourished by the sympathy fostered in the lower-level orders of family and friends. At the same time, the economic order affects these lower orders, influencing in turn the norms of behavior and rules of conduct that support economic activity. Understanding how these different levels of order interact is central to understanding the often murky link between economics and morality. Such an understanding also begs for the rescue of the social sciences from the silos of separate political and economic analysis back to a Smithian ‘moral philosophy’ that takes into account human social behavior in its many forms.


Commercial Society Invisible Hand Moral Sentiment Spontaneous Order Impartial Spectator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Hall, Lauren K. (2014). Family and the Politics of Moderation: Private Life, Public Goods, and the Rebirth of Social Individualism (Waco: Baylor University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Hayek, F. A. (1945). ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review 35(4): 519–30.Google Scholar
  3. Hirschman, Albert O. (1977). The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Horwitz, Steven (2005a). ‘Two Worlds at Once: Rand, Hayek, and the Ethics of the Micro-and Macro-Cosmos’, Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 6(2). Ayn Rand Among the Austrians: 375–403.Google Scholar
  5. Horwitz, Steven (2005b). ‘The Functions of the Family in the Great Society’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 29(5): 669–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McCloskey, Deirdre N. (2006). The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Montes, Leonidas (2003). ‘Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25(1): 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nerozzi, Sebastiano and Nuti, Pierluigi (2011). ‘Adam Smith and the Family’, History of Economic Ideas XIX(2): 11–41.Google Scholar
  9. Nieli, Russell (1986). ‘Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem’, Journal of the History of Ideas 47: 611–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, Adam (1976). Lectures on Jurisprudence (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund).Google Scholar
  11. Smith, Adam (1981). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics).Google Scholar
  12. Smith, Adam (1982). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).Google Scholar
  13. Teichgraeber, III, Richard. (1981). ‘Rethinking Das Adam Smith Problem’, Journal of British Studies 20(2): 106–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilson, D. and Dixon, W. (2006). ‘Das Adam Smith Problem: A Critical Realist Perspective’, Journal of Critical Realism 5(2): 251–72.Google Scholar
  15. Witztum, Amos (1998). ‘A Study into Smith’s Conception of the Human Character: Das Adam Smith Problem Revisited’, History of Political Economy 30(3): 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Lauren K. Hall 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren K. Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentRochester Institute of TechnologyNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations