Skip to main content

Rewriting Culture: Montaigne Recounts New World Ethnography

  • Chapter
Book cover Montaigne and Brief Narrative Form
  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

Caught between substantial domestic and local responsibilities requiring his attention in the south of France and serious national as well as international crises on the other, Michel de Montaigne sought in the accounts of the New World by Francisco Lopez de Gómara, André Thevet, and Jean de Léry not only an escape from the political and religious unrest of his time, but an instructive view of how other cultures had dealt with internal and external threats to peace and well-being.1 In recasting the work of sixteenth-century chroniclers, he does so not only using the narrative techniques of his contemporary conteurs but also from the perspective of the increasing brutality and violence on the home front. Montaigne’s two essays, “Des cannibales”, and “Des coches” have been hailed as an early appeal to cultural relativism, that is, the examination of customs within the context of the culture to which they belong.2 More precisely, Montaigne understood the conflict between personal ethics and public action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Critics have not ignored the aspect of play in Montaigne’s text, especially in his overemphasis on the purity of the cannibals. See Joseph R. de Lutri, “Montaigne’s ‘Des cannibales’: Invention/Experience,” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 38, 1 (1976): 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gérard Defaux, “Un cannibale en haut de chausses: Montaigne, la différence et la logique d’identité,” MLN 97 (1982): 919–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. David Quint, in “A Reconsideration of Montaigne’s Des cannibales,” Modern Language Quarterly: A Journal of Literary History 51, 4 (1990): 459–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. S. Khare, “The Other’s Double—The Anthropologist’s Bracketed Self: Notes on Cultural Representation and Privileged Discourse,” New Literary History 23 (1992): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tzvetan Todorov, “The Morality of Conquest,” Diogenes 125 (1984): 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. André Thevet, Les Singularités de la France antarctique que autrement nommée Amérique et de plusieurs terres et îles découvertes de notre temps par Frère André Thevet natif d’Angoulême, à Paris 1558 (Paris: Le Temps, 1982) fol. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stephen Greenblatt, Marvelous Possessions: The Wonders of the New World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), 95.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Francisco López de Gómara, Cortés: The Life of the Conqueror by his Secretary, trans. Lesley Byrd Simpson (Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1966), 105.

    Google Scholar 

  9. George Hoffmann, “Anatomy of the Mass: Montaigne’s ‘Cannibals’,” PMLA 117, 2 (March 2002): 207–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank Lestringant, “Montaigne, le Brésil et l’unité du genre humain,” Montaigne Studies XXII, 1–2 (2010): 9–22

    Google Scholar 

  11. André Tournon, Montaigne. La glose et l’essai (Paris: Honoré Champion, 2000), 221.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thevet mentions cannibalism among the Scythians, but Montaigne adds mention of the Stoics and the Gauls. Daniel Martin posits that Montaigne devoted a whole essay to cannibalism in response to the Valladoid hearings in Spain, called by Charles V, in which Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda argues against Bartolomé de Las Casas on whether it was legal to wage war on the Indians in order to subjugate them before converting them to Catholicism. According to Martin, the only argument advanced by Sepúlveda which Las Casas was unable to defend was in regard to the cannibalism of the Indians. Martin contends that Montaigne takes up the argument by developing the analogy with the kings of Europe, the mange-peuples, 588. See Daniel Martin, “Cannibals and Kings: Montaigne and the Valladoid Hearings of 1550–1551,” History of European Ideas 20, 1–3 (1995): 585–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jean de Léry, Histoire d’un voyage faict en la terre du Brésil, ed. Frank Lestringant (Paris: Livre de Poche, 1994), 366.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jean de Léry, History of a Voyage to the Land of Brazil, ed. Janet Whatley (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992), 127.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frank Lestringant, Le Huguenot et le sauvage. L’Amérique et la conroverse colonial en France au temps des guerres de religion (Geneva: Droz, 2004), 206.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andrea Frisch, in her distinguished work, The Invention of the Eyewitness: Witnessing and Testimony in Early Modern France (Chapel Hill: North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Joel Fineman, “The History of the Anecdote: Fiction and Fact,” in The New Historicism, ed. H. Aram Veeser (New York/London: Routledge, 1989): 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Deborah N. Losse

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Losse, D.N. (2013). Rewriting Culture: Montaigne Recounts New World Ethnography. In: Montaigne and Brief Narrative Form. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137320834_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics