Abstract
When early dramatic texts are recorded in manuscript form rather than in print, textual editors and students of historical performance must be sensitive to the materiality, conventions and specificities of manuscript culture as a whole and to the nature of the particular manuscript. The relationship of a manuscript drama to the probable scene of performance must often be reconstructed in the absence of explicit performance records, and in doing such reconstruction minute examination of the manuscript can provide unexpected help. This chapter examines the Towneley manuscript of biblical plays,1 its codicology, construction, sequence of copying and marginalia. The picture that emerges is one that might conceivably influence both the future editorial treatment of the plays and discussion of their likely performance history.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Payne Collier, History of English Dramatic Poetry to the Time of Shakespeare and Annals of the Stage to the Restoration, 3 vols (London: Murray, 1831).
See, for example, Mendal G. Frampton, ‘The Date of the Flourishing of the “Wakefield Master”’, PMLA 50(1935): 631–60.
Warren Edminster, The Preaching Fox: Festive Subversion in the Plays of the Wakefield Master (New York: Routledge, 2005).
David Bevington, Medieval Drama (Boston, MA: Houghton, 1975).
Garrett P. J. Epp, ‘The Towneley Plays and the Hazards of Cycling’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 32 (1993): 121–50.
Barbara D. Palmer, ‘“Towneley Plays” or “Wakefield Cycle” Revisited’, Comparative Drama 21.4 (1987–88): 318–48.
Barbara D. Palmer, ‘Recycling “The Wakefield Cycle”: The Records’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 41 (2002): 88–130.
A. C. Cawley, Jean Forrester and John Goodchild, ‘References to the Corpus Christi Play in the Wakefield Burgess Court Rolls: The Originals Rediscovered’, Leeds Studies in English 19 (1988): 85–104.
M. B. Parkes, ‘The Influence of the Concepts of Ordinatio and Compilatio on the Development of the Book’, Scribes, Scripts and Readers: Studies in the Communication, Presentation, and Dissemination of Medieval Texts (London: Hambledon, 1991) 35–70.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Murray McGillivray
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGillivray, M. (2014). The Towneley Manuscript and Performance: Tudor Recycling?. In: Jenkins, J., Sanders, J. (eds) Editing, Performance, Texts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137320117_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137320117_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45763-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32011-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)