Skip to main content

The Towneley Manuscript and Performance: Tudor Recycling?

  • Chapter
Editing, Performance, Texts
  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

When early dramatic texts are recorded in manuscript form rather than in print, textual editors and students of historical performance must be sensitive to the materiality, conventions and specificities of manuscript culture as a whole and to the nature of the particular manuscript. The relationship of a manuscript drama to the probable scene of performance must often be reconstructed in the absence of explicit performance records, and in doing such reconstruction minute examination of the manuscript can provide unexpected help. This chapter examines the Towneley manuscript of biblical plays,1 its codicology, construction, sequence of copying and marginalia. The picture that emerges is one that might conceivably influence both the future editorial treatment of the plays and discussion of their likely performance history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John Payne Collier, History of English Dramatic Poetry to the Time of Shakespeare and Annals of the Stage to the Restoration, 3 vols (London: Murray, 1831).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Mendal G. Frampton, ‘The Date of the Flourishing of the “Wakefield Master”’, PMLA 50(1935): 631–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Warren Edminster, The Preaching Fox: Festive Subversion in the Plays of the Wakefield Master (New York: Routledge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Bevington, Medieval Drama (Boston, MA: Houghton, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garrett P. J. Epp, ‘The Towneley Plays and the Hazards of Cycling’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 32 (1993): 121–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barbara D. Palmer, ‘“Towneley Plays” or “Wakefield Cycle” Revisited’, Comparative Drama 21.4 (1987–88): 318–48.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barbara D. Palmer, ‘Recycling “The Wakefield Cycle”: The Records’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 41 (2002): 88–130.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. C. Cawley, Jean Forrester and John Goodchild, ‘References to the Corpus Christi Play in the Wakefield Burgess Court Rolls: The Originals Rediscovered’, Leeds Studies in English 19 (1988): 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. B. Parkes, ‘The Influence of the Concepts of Ordinatio and Compilatio on the Development of the Book’, Scribes, Scripts and Readers: Studies in the Communication, Presentation, and Dissemination of Medieval Texts (London: Hambledon, 1991) 35–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Murray McGillivray

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGillivray, M. (2014). The Towneley Manuscript and Performance: Tudor Recycling?. In: Jenkins, J., Sanders, J. (eds) Editing, Performance, Texts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137320117_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics