Abstract
We face an inherent paradox as instructors of world literature. Although we present our students with texts that often challenge the norms of formal academic discourse, we simultaneously ask our students to respond to these texts in written assignments that enforce the very same norms. Requiring students to embrace these norms in their own writing often undermines the authors under consideration; enforcement of the formal academic standard foregrounds the underlying Western value system—clarity, directness, linearity, and so onthat many authors in the world literature cannon resist. Moreover, the formal standard mitigates the revolutionary potential of the ideas presented in world literature by reinforcing the type of intellectual training that, Lynn Bloom argues, “promulgates the middle-class values that are thought to be essential to the proper functioning of students in the academy” (656).1 Within our curriculum, then, we must locate opportunities where students can enact—not merely observe—techniques and writing strategies that complicate the implicit values of formal academic discourse; we must locate opportunities where students can demonstrate their understanding of a text not by merely recycling a prescribed form, but by authoritatively establishing their own voice.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Bloom, Lynn Z. “Freshman Composition as a Middle-Class Enterprise,” College English 58, no. 6 (October, 1996): 654–675.
Cheng, Vincent. “Empire and Patriarchy in ‘The Dead.’” Joyce, Race, and Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 128–47.
Ellmann, Richard. James Joyce, rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
Gifford, Don, and Robert J. Seidman. Ulysses Annotated: Notes For James Joyce’s Ulysses. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.
Johnson, T. R. “School Sucks.” College Composition and Communication 52, no. 4 (June, 2001).
Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
—. Ulysses. New York: Vintage International, 1990.
Mullin, Katherine. James Joyce, Sexuality and Social Purity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Orr, Leonard, ed. Joyce, Imperialism, & Postcolonialism. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2008.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Masood Ashraf Raja, Hillary Stringer, and Zach VandeZande
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, M.M. (2013). “The Speculation of Schoolboys”: Confronting the Academy in Ulysses . In: Raja, M.A., Stringer, H., VandeZande, Z. (eds) Critical Pedagogy and Global Literature. New Frontiers in Education, Culture, and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319760_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319760_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45746-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31976-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)