Abstract
In Chapter 2 I discussed Giddens’ (1991, 1992) argument that the freeing of sex from reproduction results in plastic sexuality and the transformation of intimacy, contrasting it with Beck and Beck-Gernsheim’s (1995, 2001) argument that individualization, particularly that of women, threatens the institution of family. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim argue that the contradiction between the flexibility and mobility required to succeed in the job market and the stability and rootedness required to create a strong family life can threaten the family. In spite of these crucial differences, both theorists are united in the position that modernity strengthens individualization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Jyothsna Latha Belliappa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Belliappa, J.L. (2013). Individualism and Responsibility: Women’s Relationships Within Their Families. In: Gender, Class and Reflexive Modernity in India. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319227_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319227_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33588-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31922-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)