Skip to main content

Individualism and Responsibility: Women’s Relationships Within Their Families

  • Chapter
  • 224 Accesses

Part of the book series: Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences ((GSSS))

Abstract

In Chapter 2 I discussed Giddens’ (1991, 1992) argument that the freeing of sex from reproduction results in plastic sexuality and the transformation of intimacy, contrasting it with Beck and Beck-Gernsheim’s (1995, 2001) argument that individualization, particularly that of women, threatens the institution of family. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim argue that the contradiction between the flexibility and mobility required to succeed in the job market and the stability and rootedness required to create a strong family life can threaten the family. In spite of these crucial differences, both theorists are united in the position that modernity strengthens individualization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Jyothsna Latha Belliappa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belliappa, J.L. (2013). Individualism and Responsibility: Women’s Relationships Within Their Families. In: Gender, Class and Reflexive Modernity in India. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319227_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics