Advertisement

Harmonic and Conflict Views in International Economic Relations: a Sraffian View

  • Sergio Cesaratto
Chapter
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

In dealing with the European crisis and the frequent accusation of German ‘mercantilist behaviour’ (Cesaratto, 2011, 2012b, 2013; Cesaratto and Stirati, 2011), it seemed natural to look for analytical approaches to international economic relations (IER) that went beyond naive pro-European rhetoric and mainstream economic beliefs in the harmonic virtues of international laissez-faire. Some Sraffian contributions to the demolition of these beliefs will be recalled below. The pre-laissez-faire, mercantilist tradition was another natural candidate for attention. Mercantilism, the world of non-harmony, may be envisaged as an underground tradition, which a group of northern European economists called ‘the other canon’ (www.othercanon.org), parallel to the laissez-faire tradition. Kalecki’s view of net exports as a way of realising profits also buttresses a conflict view of IER. A cynical view also springs from political realism, a major tradition in political science. An intellectual father of political realism was Thomas Hobbes, contemporary of many British mercantilists. In this tradition, a social contract is enforceable at domestic level by attributing authority to the Prince, but not at international level where sovereign states do not submissively recognise any higher authority. Mercantilism and political realism converge in international political economy (IPE), a field that arose in the early 1970s as an attempt to bridge the gap between the disciplines of international economics and international relations (Strange, 1970).

Keywords

Comparative Advantage Real Wage Political Realism Trade Surplus Social Surplus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aspromourgos, A. (1996) On the Origins of Classical Economics: Distribution and Value from William Petty to Adam Smith (London and New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (New York: Crown).Google Scholar
  3. Brancaccio, E. and Fontana, G. (eds) (2011) The Global Economic Crisis. New Perspectives on the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  4. Brewer, A. (1980) Marxist Theories of Imperialism - A Critical Survey (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, A. (1985) ‘Trade with fixed real wages and mobile capital’, Journal of International Economics, XVIII: 177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, E. H. (1981 [1939]) The Twenty Years’ Crisis - 1919–1939 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  7. Cesaratto, S. (1996) ‘Alternative Perspectives on Division of Labour, Structural Change and Economic Growth’, in C. De Bresson (ed.), Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity: An Input-output Analysis (Edward Elgar) (rev. version: Studi Economici, 67, 1999).Google Scholar
  8. Cesaratto, S. (2011) ‘Europe, German Mercantilism and the Current Crisis’, in E. Brancaccio and G. Fontana (eds), The Global Economic Crisis. New Perspectives on the Critique of Economic Theory and Policy (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  9. Cesaratto, S. (2012a) ‘Neo-Kaleckian and Sraffian controversies on accumulation theory’, University of Siena Working Paper, 650, mimeo.Google Scholar
  10. Cesaratto, S. (2012b) ‘Controversial and Novel Features of the Eurozone Crisis as a Balance of Payment Crisis’, in O. Dejuán, J. Uxó and E. Febrero (2013), Post Keynesian Views of the Economic Crisis and its Remedies (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  11. Cesaratto, S. (2013) ‘The Endless Eurozone Crisis, Where Do We Stand? A Classical-Kaleckian Overview’, Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica, Università di Siena, Working paper 671, http://www.econ-pol.unisi.it/dipartimento/it/node/1813 (forthcoming in Studi Economici).Google Scholar
  12. Cesaratto, S. and Stirati, A. (2011) ‘Is Germany a mercantilist country? Germany in the European and global crises’, International Journal of Political Economy, XXXIX: 56–87.Google Scholar
  13. Coats, A. W. (1958) ‘In Defence of Heckscher and the Idea of Mercantilism’, Scandinavian Economic History Review, V, 173–87 (repr. in ID, On the History of Economic Thought, vol. I, London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, B. J. (2008) International Political Economy: An Intellectual History (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, D. C. (1957) ‘Eli Heckscher and the idea of mercantilism’, Scandinavian Economic History Review, V: 1–25 (repr. in ID [ed.], Revisions in Mercantilism, London: Methuen, 1969).Google Scholar
  16. Cronin, J. E. (1996) The World the Cold War Made: Order, Chaos and the Return of History (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  17. Crouch, C. (2008) ‘What will follow the demise of privatised Keynesianism’, Political Quarterly, LXXIX: 476–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalziel, P. C. and Harcourt, G. C. (1997) ‘A note on “Mr Meade’s Relation” and international capital movements’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, XXI: 621–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desai, R. (2012) ‘Marx, List, and the materiality of nations’, Rethinking Marxism, XXIV: 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamond, J. (2005 [1997]) Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years (London: Vintage).Google Scholar
  21. Diamond, J. (2012) ‘What makes countries rich or poor?’, New York Review of Books, 7 June.Google Scholar
  22. Donnelly, J. (2000) Realism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ehrlich, H. B. (1955) ‘British mercantilist theories of profit’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, XIV: 377–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farrell, H. and Finnemore, M. (2009) ‘Ontology, methodology, and causation in the American school of international political economy’, Review of International Political Economy, XVI: 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franzese, R. J. and Hall, P. A. (2000) ‘Institutional Dimensions of Coordinating Wage-Bargaining and Monetary Policy’, in T. Iversen, J. Pontusson and D. Soskice (eds), Unions, Employers, and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): pp. 173–204.Google Scholar
  26. Furniss, E. (1920) The Position of the Laborer in a System of Nationalism: A Study in the Labor Theories of the Later English Mercantilists (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company).Google Scholar
  27. Garegnani, P. (1983) ‘Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand’, in J. Eatwell and M. Milgate (eds), (1983), Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
  28. Garegnani, P. (1984) ‘Value and distribution in the classical economists and Marx’, Oxford Economic Papers, XXXVI: 291–325.Google Scholar
  29. Gerschenkron, A. (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  30. Gilpin, R. G. (1984) ‘Richness of the tradition of political realism’, International Organization, XXXVIII: 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilpin, R. G. (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  32. Heckscher, E. (1955) Mercantilism, 2nd edn (1st edn in Swedish, 1931) (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  33. Hirschman, A. (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments For Capitalism Before Its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, E. A. J. (1937) Predecessors of Adam Smith (London: P.S. King & Son).Google Scholar
  35. Jonung, L. and Drea, E. (2009) ‘The euro: It can’t happen, It’s a bad idea, It won’t last. US economists on the EMU’, www.ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publicationsGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalecki, M. (1967) ‘The problem of effective demand with Tugan-Baranovski and Rosa Luxemburg’, in ID, Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy (1971) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  37. Katzenstein, P. J. (1977) ‘Domestic and international forces and strategies of foreign economic policy’, International Organization, XXXI (issue no. 4: ‘Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States’): 587–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katzenstein, P. J. (2009) ‘Mid-Atlantic: Sitting on the knife’s sharp edge’, Review of International Political Economy, XVI: 122–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keohane, R. O. (2009) ‘The old IPE and the new’, Review of International Political Economy, XVI: 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kindleberger, C. P. (1981) ‘Dominance and leadership in the international economy’, International Studies Quarterly, XXV: 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kriesler, P. and Halevi, J. (1996) ‘Asia, Japan and the internalization of effective demand’, Economies and Sociétés - Monnaie et production, X: 301–20.Google Scholar
  42. Lake, D. A. (2009) ‘TRIPs across the Atlantic: theory and epistemology in IPE’, Review of International Political Economy, XVI: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. List, F. (1841) The National System of Political Economy (1991 edn) (New Jersey: Augustus M. Kelly).Google Scholar
  44. Marx, K. (1975 [1845]) Draft of an Article on Friedrich List’s book: Das Nationale System der Politischen Oekonomie, Marx-Engels Collected Works, Vol. 4: Marx and Engels: 1844–45 (New York: International Publishers).Google Scholar
  45. Marx, K. (1973 [1857]) Grundrisse - Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft) (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
  46. Marx, K. (1977 [1859] A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (Moscow: Progress Publishers).Google Scholar
  47. Marx, K. (1969 [1861–3]) Theories of Surplus Value, Part 1 (London: Lawrence & Wishart).Google Scholar
  48. Meek, R. L. (1971) ‘Smith, Turgot and the Four Stages Theory’, History of Political Economy, 3: 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meek, R. L. (1976) Social Science and the Ignoble Savage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  50. Mundell, R. A. (1957) ‘International Trade and Factor Mobility’, American Economic Review, XLVII, 321–35.Google Scholar
  51. Parrinello, S. (2009) ‘The Notion of National Competitiveness in a Global Economy’, in D. Vint, S. Metcalfe, H. Kurz, P. Samuelson and N. Salvadori (eds), Essays in Honour of Ian Steedman (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  52. Riha, T. (1985) German Political Economy: The History of an Alternative Economics (Bradford: MCB University Press).Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, J. (1966) The New Mercantilism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  54. Schmoller, G. (1897) The Mercantile System and Its Historical Significance (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  55. Serrano, F. (2008) ‘Kalecki y la economia americana en los anos 2000’, Circus, I: 7–24.Google Scholar
  56. Sraffa, P. (1951) ‘Introduction to Ricardo’s Principles’, in P. Sraffa and M. H. Dobb (eds) The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  57. Steedman, I. (1979a) Trade amongst Growing Economies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  58. Steedman, I. (ed.) (1979b) Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  59. Strange, S. (1970) ‘International economics and international relations: a case of mutual neglect’, International Affairs, XLVI: 304–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, A. (1979 [1776]) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  61. Suviranta, B. (1923) The Theory of Balance of Trade in England - A Study in Mercantilism (Helsinki: Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, B-XVII).Google Scholar
  62. Szporluk, R. (1988) Communism and Nationalism: Karl Marx Versus Friedrich List (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  63. Viner, J. (1948) ‘Power and plenty as objectives of foreign policy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’, World Politics, I: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© contributors 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio Cesaratto

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations