Abstract
Any discussion of the development of opium policy in colonial Burma would be incomplete without considering the implications of the Royal Commission on Opium. The Commission, which began its investigations in 1893 and published its final report in 1895, was a pivotal moment in the history of British colonial opium policy, in Burma and elsewhere. The sheer volume of material collected by the Commission demands attention.1 This chapter and the following chapter will explore the Commission’s procedures and findings in detail. This chapter will summarise the testimony presented at the Commission that was relevant to Burma. The following chapter will analyse the significance of this testimony, with regard to the connection between opium regulation and imperial rule. This work’s premise is that control of opium and imperial rule were bound together in complex ways, with opium and its regulation influencing and influenced by the imperial power’s desire to regulate labour, the construction of racial discourses, and the networked context of imperial power. Each of these connections became apparent in the course of the Commission’s concerted investigation into the workings of the opium industry in India, though as the following chapter will argue, ultimately the testimony and the final report of the Commission made it clear that above all else, by the end of the nineteenth century colonial opium policy was designed to ensure the continuance of imperial rule.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John F. Richards described the report and proceedings of the Commission as “one of the most valuable sources we possess for studying all aspects of opium in India in the latter decades of the nineteenth century”. John F. Richards, “Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895”, Modern Asian Studies, 36, 2 (2002), 382.
John F. Richards, “Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895”, Modern Asian Studies, 36, 2 (2002), 303.
Ibid., pp. 382–8.
John F. Richards, “Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895”, Modern Asian Studies, 36, 2 (2002).
B.R. Tomlinson, “Strachey, Sir John (1823–1907)”, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford University Press, 2004) (http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36339, accessed 28 Dec. 2012).
All information from Chirol, Valentine “Birdwood, Sir George Christopher Molesworth (1832–1917)”. Rev. Katherine Prior. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, edited by H.C.G. Matthew and Brian Harrison (Oxford: OUP, 2004) http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/31896 (accessed November 27, 2007).
Brian Inglis, The Forbidden Game: A Social History of Drugs (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1975), p. 92.
Mrs. Leslie Milne, Shans at Home (London: John Murray, 1910), p. 180.
Katherine Prior, “Smeaton, Donald Mackenzie (1846–1910)”. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, edited by H.C.G. Matthew and Brian Harrison (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004) http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36124 (accessed November 27, 2007).
“The Opinion of the Financial Commissioner of Burma, Mr Donald Mackenzie Smeaton, from Rangoon Times”, Friend of China, 14, 6 (January 1894), 188–90.
For a description of how Lyall attempted to influence the findings of the Commission to support the Government’s position, see John F. Richards, “Opium and the British Indian Empire: The Royal Commission of 1895”, Modern Asian Studies, 36, 2 (2002), 397–8.
Paul C. Winther, Anglo-European Science and the Rhetoric of Empire (Lanham and Oxford: Lexington Books, 2003), pp. 18–26. By the time of the Royal Commission, Winther argues, the scientific consensus in the west did not support the use of opium as a malaria preventive or curative. Winther writes: “By the early 1890s, and most certainly during the remaining years of the century, western medical researchers knew a great deal about ‘the nature of the disease [malaria], [and] the various forms of fever’ … This erudition disappeared en route to India”. Ibid., p. 26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Ashley Wright
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wright, A. (2014). Burma as a “Special Case”: Testimony about Burma at the Royal Commission on Opium of 1893–1895. In: Opium and Empire in Southeast Asia. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317605_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317605_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33362-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31760-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)