Skip to main content

The Varieties and the Cognitive Value of Religious Experiences

  • Chapter
  • 199 Accesses

Part of the book series: Philosophers in Depth ((PID))

Abstract

When analyzing William James’ philosophy of religion, we often turn to his explicit writings on religion, e.g. in his The Varieties of Religious Experience,2 and to his theoretical views on cognition, experience, and epistemology, such as in The Principles of Psychology, A Pluralistic Universe, and Essays in Radical Empiricism.3 There is much debate, however, on what James’ views are on such basic issues as consciousness, experience, and truth.4 This chapter establishes whether, from a pragmatist perspective, religious experiences can have cognitive value. Instead of turning to James’ theoretical writings on these issues, however, I analyze his more empirical The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature in answering this question.

I am indebted to the Fulbright Center for a grant that aided in conducting part of my PhD research at Harvard University in the fall semester of 2010, during which I wrote a first version of this chapter. I thank David Lamberth and Parimal Patil for valuable comments on my argument, and the members of Harvard Divinity School’s Colloquium on Theology, Religion, Ethics, Politics and Sociology, under supervision of Francis Fiorenza, for valuable feedback when I had the opportunity of presenting an earlier version of this chapter to them. Finally, I thank my dissertation supervisors, Christoph Baumgartner and Dirk- Martin Grube.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. James ( 1963 [1902]) The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature, ed. J. Ratner ( New York: University Books).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. James ( 1981 [1890]) The Principles of Psychology ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. James ( 1977 [1909]) A Pluralistic Universe ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. James ( 1976 [1912]) Essays in Radical Empiricism ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  5. In this regard, see e.g. Owen Flanagan’s discussion of one of the central concepts to James, consciousness, in O. Flanagan (1997) ‘Consciousness as a Pragmatist Views it’ in R. A. Putnam (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to William James (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 25–48, esp. p. 29. Flanagan’s is a noteworthy perspective on James’ notion of consciousness, including the problems with seeming inconsistencies or changes of mind throughout James’ intellectual career. See also the discussion between David Lamberth and Hilary Putnam on James’ notion of truth.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. See H. Putnam (1997) ‘James’s Theory of Truth’ in Putnam (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to William James, pp. 166–85;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. D. C. Lamberth (2005) ‘James and the Question of Truth: A Response to Hilary Putnam’ in J. R. Carrette (ed.) William James and ‘ The Varieties of Religious Experience’: A Centenary Celebration (London: Routledge), pp. 172–82 and 221–34, respectively.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See e.g. H. Putnam (2000) The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body, and World ( New York: Columbia University Press), esp. pp. 43–92.

    Google Scholar 

  9. An analysis of Putnam’s viewpoints on the role of experience in religion would reach beyond the limits of this chapter. I refer to my ‘One Religious Truth? Assessing Religious Propositions in a Secular Society’ in N. Brunsveld and R. Trigg (eds.) (2010) Religion in the Public Sphere. Ars Disputandi Supplement Series 5 ( Utrecht: Igitur Publishing ), pp. 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. James (1904) ‘A World of Pure Experience’, The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1 (20), 533–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W. James ( 2008 [1907]) Pragmatism. A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking ( Rockville: Manor ), pp. 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For an analysis of James’ notion of truth, see D. C. Lamberth (1999) William James and the Metaphysics of Experience ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 205–9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. E. K. Suckiel (1996) Heaven’s Champion: William James’s Philosophy of Religion (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press). See also James’ letter to Mrs. James, Castebelle, April 13, 1900, in James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, p. 533.

    Google Scholar 

  14. In this respect, James writes that ‘[a] survey of history shows us that, as a rule, religious geniuses attract disciples, and produce groups of sympathizers. When these groups get strong enough to “organize” themselves, they become ecclesiastical institutions with corporate ambitions of their own. The spirit of politics and the lust of dogmatic rule are then apt to enter and to contaminate the originally innocent thing… and to some persons the word “church” suggests so much hypocrisy and tyranny and meanness and tenacity of superstition that in a wholesale undiscerning way they glory in saying that they are “down” on religion altogether’ (ibid., pp. 334–5). Cf. also James’ claims about the heterodoxy of the ‘genuine first- hand religious experience’ (ibid., p. 337) and John Dewey’s worries about the same in the first part of John Dewey (1960 [1934]) A Common Faith (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  15. It is clear that James was attentive to religious questions himself. See e.g. Suckiel, Heaven’s Champion, chapter 1, who argues that despite his ambivalence about being religious himself, James nevertheless took religion to be one of the most important aspects of life. Furthermore, James believed that being religious would help a person live a morally better life. See W. James (1891) ‘The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life’, International Journal of Ethics, 1(3), 330–54. Cf. also M. R. Slater (2009) William James on Ethics and Faith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), chapters 3 and 4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, pp. 73–4. See H. Brown (2000) William James on Radical Empiricism and Religion (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), esp. chapter 1, for an account of James’ endeavor to bring in subjectivity in epistemology.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See H. S. Levinson (1981) The Religious Investigations of William James (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press), esp. pp. 220–30, for a discussion of the meanings of the term ‘truth’ in James’ days and ours.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See e.g. S. Pihlström (2006) ‘Putnam’s Conception of Ontology’, Contemporary Pragmatism, 3 (2), 1–13;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Copp (2006) ‘The Ontology of Putnam’s Ethics without Ontology’, Contemporary Pragmatism, 3(2), 39–53; and

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Travis (2005) ‘The Face of Perception’ in Y. Ben-Menahem (ed.) Hilary Putnam ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 53–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. See Putnam, The Threefold Cord, esp. pp. 43–92; and H. Putnam (2004) Ethics without Ontology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 52–69. Cf. Brunsveld, ‘One Religious Truth?’ for a concise introduction to the issue of pragmatic pluralist truth.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. R. A. Hertz (1971) ‘James and Moore: Two Perspectives on Truth’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 9(2), 213. Putnam’s pragmatic pluralism conflicts e.g. with James’ notion that concepts acquire meaning through external relations rather than having meaning through their intrinsic relation with that to which they refer. See Putnam, ‘James’s Theory of Truth’; Putnam, ‘James on Truth (again)’; and David Lamberth’s criticism in Lamberth, ‘James and the Question of Truth: A Response to Hilary Putnam’.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. See H. Putnam (2012) ‘Sensation and Apperception’ in S. Miguens and G. Preyer (eds.) Consciousness and Subjectivity (Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag), pp. 39–50; and Putnam, The Threefold Cord, pp. 43–92. Cf. Travis, ‘The Face of Perception’ for an introduction to Putnam’s notion of experience.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Niek Brunsveld

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brunsveld, N. (2013). The Varieties and the Cognitive Value of Religious Experiences. In: Rydenfelt, H., Pihlström, S. (eds) William James on Religion. Philosophers in Depth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317353_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics