Advertisement

Analysing European Discourses

  • Amandine Crespy
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

Discourse analysis is one of the most widespread research approaches across the social sciences, ranging from linguistics to sociology, anthropology and political science. Therefore it comes as no surprise that discourse analysis has also become a central approach in European studies. Discursive approaches to Europe have also diversified as the study of European integration has been mainstreamed into the various sub-fields of political science including international relations, public policy analysis and political sociology. The study of European discourses therefore accounts for a large variety of research questions and epistemological and ontological stances. The peculiarity of discourse analysis is that it can be used both as a mere analysis technique by the most rationalist and positivist scholars, and as a general theory of politics in a constructivist and interpretive perspective. Between these two opposite scholarly poles, there is a vast category of students of EU integration who take a middle-stance and seek to explain how discourse matters with explanatory endeavours, but also some modest conception of social scientists’ ability to establish causality. Fundamentally, studying European discourses means looking at discourse either as a dependent variable — what is said about Europe? How and why? — Or as an independent variable: how do discourses impact national polities and shape the process of integration? Or both. Although not exhaustive, this chapter provides a structured overview for anyone who wishes to make her/his way through the jungle of the various methodological discursive approaches to EU integration.

Keywords

World Trade Organization Discourse Analysis Critical Discourse Analysis Public Diplomacy Discursive Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banchoff, T. (1999) National Identity and EU Legitimacy in France and Germany, in Banchoff, T. and Smith, M.P. (eds.) Legitimacy and the European Union. The Contested Polity (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  2. Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A. (2000) ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Creed, D.W.E, Langstraat, J. and Scully, M.A. (2002) ‘A Picture of the Frame: Frame Analysis as Technique and as Politics’, Organizational Research Methods 5(1): 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crespy, A. (2010) ‘When Bolkestein Is Trapped By the French Anti-Liberal Discourse: A Discursive-Institutionalist Account of Preference Formation in the Realm of EU Multi-Level Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(8): 1253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crespy, A. (2012a) Qui a peur de Bolkestein? Conflit, résistances et démocratie dans l’Union européenne (Paris: Economica).Google Scholar
  6. Crespy, A. (2012b) ‘Expliquer l’impuissance partisane dans le policy making européen. Social-démocratie et régulation des services publics’, Politique européenne 38: 154–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crespy, A. (2014a) ‘Deliberative Democracy and the Legitimacy of the European Union: A Reappraisal of Conflict’, Political Studies 62(issue supplement s1) 2014: 81–98. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9248.12058/full accessed 13 November 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crespy, A. (2014b) ‘A Dialogue of the Deaf? Conflicting Discourses Over the EU and Services Liberalisation in the WTO’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 16(1): 168–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crespy, A. and Schmidt, V.A. (2014) ‘The Clash of Titans: France, Germany and the Discursive Double Game of EMU Reform’, Journal of European Public Policy 27(8): 1085–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. della Porta, D. (2006) ‘The Anti-Globalisation and the European Union: Critics of Europe’, Notre Europe, Policy paper 22: 1–33. http://www.notre-europe.eu/media/policypaper22-en_03.pdf?pdf=ok accessed 13 November 2014.Google Scholar
  11. Diez, T. (2001) ‘Europe as a Discursive Battleground Discourse Analysis and European Integration Studies’, Cooperation and Conflict 36(1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diez Medrano, J. (2003) Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Doerr, N. (2008) ‘When Things Get Multilingual: Deliberative Discussion, Language and Efficiency in the WSF Process’, Mobilization 13(4): 395–410.Google Scholar
  14. Doerr, N., Mattoni, A. and Teune, S. (eds.) (2013) Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change Vol. 35. Advances in the Visual Analysis of Social Movements (Bingley: Emerald).Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy. Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fouilleux, E. (2004) ‘CAP Reforms and Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Another View on Discourse Efficiency’, West European Politics 27(2): 235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gobin, C. and Deroubaix, J-C. (2009) ‘Words, Frequency and Networks in Political Discourse: Lexicometric Analysis in Two Corpora of European Texts’, Sociolinguistic Studies 3(2): 203–27.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (London: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
  19. Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harmsen, R. (2008) ‘The Evolution of Dutch European Discourse: Defining the “Limits of Europe”’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9(3): 316–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hay, C. and Rosamond, B. (2002) ‘Globalisation, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(2): 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jachtenfuchs, M., Diez, T. and Jung, S. (1998) ‘Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Order’, European Journal of International Relations 44(4): 409–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jobert, B. (1994) Le tournant néo-libéral en Europe (Paris: L’Harmattan).Google Scholar
  24. Jones, M.D. and McBeth, M.K. (2010) ‘A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?’, Policy Studies Journal 38(2): 329–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. (1999) ‘Political Claim Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches’, Mobilization 4(1): 203–22.Google Scholar
  26. Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. (eds.) (2010) The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  27. Larsen, H. (1999) ‘British and Danish European Policies in the 1990s: A Discourse Approach’, European Journal of International Relations 5(4): 451–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liebert, U. (2007) ‘Introduction: Structuring Political Conflict About Europe: National Media in Transnational Discourse Analysis’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 8(3): 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynggaard, K. (2007) ‘The Institutional Construction of a Policy Field: A Discursive Institutional Perspective on Change within the Common Agricultural Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lynggaard, K. (2012) ‘Discursive Institutional Analytical Strategies’, in Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C.M. (eds.) Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization (Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan).Google Scholar
  31. Maatsch, A. (forthcoming) ‘Arguing About EU Treaty Ratification: The Europeanisation of Political Conflict in National Parliamentary Debate’, in Liebert, U. (ed.) Constitutional Politics beyond the State: Bringing Citizens into the European Union.Google Scholar
  32. Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manners, I. (2013) ‘Assessing the Decennial, Reassessing the Global: Understanding European Union Normative Power in Global Politics’, in Whitman, R. and Nicolaïdis, K. (eds.) ‘European Union and Normative Power: Assessing the Decade’, Special Issue of Cooperation and Conflict 48(2): 304–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meunier, S. (2007) ‘Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 905–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muller, P. (1994) ‘La mutation des politiques européennes’, Pouvoirs 69: 63–75.Google Scholar
  36. Parks, L. (2008) ‘In the Corridors and in the Streets: A Comparative Study of the Impacts of Social Movement Campaigns in the EU’ (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis) (Department of Political and Social Sciences: European University Institute).Google Scholar
  37. Radaelli, C. (1999) ‘Harmful Tax Competition in the EU: Policy Narratives and Advocacy Coalitions’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 661–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  39. Risse, T., Engelmann-Martin, D., Knope, H. and Roscher, K. (1999) ‘To Euro or Not to Euro?: The and Identity Politics in the European Union’, European Journal of International Relations 5(2): 147–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roe, E. (1994) Narrative Policy Analysis (Durham: Duke University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sabatier, P.A. (ed.) (1999) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).Google Scholar
  42. Schmidt, V. (2002) ‘Europeanization and the Mechanisms of Economic Policy Adjustment’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(6): 894–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmidt, V.A. (2006) Democracy in Europe. The EU and National Polities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmidt, V.A. (2007) ‘Trapped By Their Ideas: French Elites’ Discourses of European Integration and Globalization’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(7): 992–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt, V.A. (2008) ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science 1: 303–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmidt, V.A. (2010) ‘Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth “New Institutionalism”’, European Political Science Review 2: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt, V.A. (2012) ‘European Elites’ Diverging Visions of the EU: Diverging Differently Since the Economic Crisis and the Arab Spring?’, Journal of European Integration 34(1): 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt, V.A. and Radaelli, C. (2004) ‘Policy Change and Discourse in Europe. Conceptual and Methodological Issues’, West European Politics 27(2): 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schön, D.A. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection. Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  50. Seidendorf, S. (2010) ‘Contesting Europe: The Constitutive Impact of Discursive Dynamics on National Referendum Campaigns’, European Political Science Review 3(2): 423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snow, D.A., Rochford Jr, E.B. and Worden, S.K. (1986) ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’, American Sociological Review 51(4): 464–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Snow, A., and Benford, R.D. (1988) ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization’, International Social Movement Research 1(1): 197–217.Google Scholar
  53. Tonra, B. and Christiansen, T. (eds.) (2004) Rethinking the European Union Foreign Policy (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  54. Trenz, H.-J. and de Wilde, P. (2009) ‘Denouncing European Integration. Euroscepticism as Reactive Identity Formation’, RECON Working Papers 2009/10.Google Scholar
  55. Van Dijk, T. (1993) ‘Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis’, Discourse & Society 42(2): 249–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waever, O. (1990) ‘Three Competing Europes: German, French, Russian’, International Organization 50(1): 153–70.Google Scholar
  57. White, J. (2010) ‘Europe in the Political Imagination’, Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4): 1015–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wodak, R. (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xiarchogiannopoulou, E. (2010) ‘Discursive Institutionalism and Pension Reform in Greece 1990–2002: Appraising Europeanization from the “Bottom-up”’ (Unpublished PhD Thesis) (Exeter: University of Exeter).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Amandine Crespy 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amandine Crespy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations