Abstract
As widely reported at the time by mainstream press and media, the new Democratic administration taking power in the White House was determined to instantiate a ‘wave of change’ in US foreign policy towards the Middle East. In his hallmark speech ‘A New Beginning’, delivered at Cairo University on 4 June 2009, the newly elected president Barack Obama spoke about the ‘intolerable humiliations’ endured by the Palestinian people, whilst promising that America ‘will not turn her back on their legitimate aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own’. With that purpose in mind, Obama pledged to work assiduously towards the diplomatic goal of a ‘two-state solution’: a shorthand for a final settlement envisaging the establishment of an independent state of Palestine within pre-1967 borders in the Gaza Strip, West Bank and East Jerusalem — a state alongside which Israel would live in peace and security. In the same speech, the president made it clear that ‘the United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.’1 According to many commentators, Obama’s rhetoric signalled, with its decisive tone and straightforward message, a true break with the past, suggesting that a divergence might exist between American and Israeli interests in that area — a possibility that had been considered a ‘virtual taboo’ since the end of the Cold War.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Michael Fiege, Settling in the Hearts: Jewish Fundamentalism in the Occupied Territories, Wayne State University Press, 2009, pp. 34–8.
David Newman, ‘From Hitnachalut to Hitnatkut: The Impact of Gush Emunim and the Settlement Movement on Israeli Politics and Society’, Israel Studies, 10 (3), 2005, p. 193.
Gideon Aran, ‘Jewish Zionist Fundamentalism: The Bloc of the Faithful in Israel (Gush Emunim)’, in Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby (eds), Fundamentalisms Observed, Fundamentalism Project I, University of Chicago Press, 1991, p. 319.
See Ian Lustick, Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza, Cornell University Press, 1993, pp. 395–405.
Rabbi Joseph Telushkin, Jewish Literacy: The Most Important Things to Know about the Jewish Religion, its People and its History, Morrow, 1991, pp. 137–47.
See David Biale, Power and Powerlessness in Jewish History, Schocken, 1986, pp. 15–27.
See Reuven Firestone, ‘Holy War in Modern Judaism? Mitzvah War and the Problem of the Three Vows’, Journal of American Academy of Religions, 74 (4), 2006, pp. 954–82. The Halakhah is the entire body of Jewish religious laws, which includes biblical law and later Talmudic and Rabbinic law, as well as customs and traditions. The Halakhah provides a detailed set of prescriptions covering every aspect of life.
Lilly Weissbrod, ‘Core Values and Revolutionary Change’, in David Newman (ed.), The Impact of Gush Emunim: Politics and Settlement in the West Bank, Croom Helm, 1984, p. 72.
See Shlomo Avineri, The Making of Modern Zionism: The Intellectual Origins of the Jewish State, Basic Books, 1981, p. 3.
See Aviezer Ravitzky, ‘Munkacs and Jerusalem: Ultra-Orthodox Opposition to Zionism and Agudaism’, in Shmuel Almog, Jehuda Reinharz and Anita Shapira (eds), Zionism and Religion, Brandeis University Press, 1998, pp. 77–8.
Aviezer Ravitzky, ‘Ultra-Orthodoxy and Anti-Zionism’, in Jacob Neusner, Alan J. Avery-Peck and William Scott Green (eds), The Encyclopedia of Judaism, Vol. 3, Continuum, 1999.
See Michael Shashar, ‘Israel and the Territories: Religious Attitudes’, Judaism, 36 (4), 1987, pp. 433–42.
Gerald Cromer, ‘Withdrawal and Conquest: Two Aspects of the Haredi Response to Modernity’, in Laurence Silberstein (ed.), Jewish Fundamentalism in Comparative Perspective: Religion, Ideology, and the Crisis of Modernity, New York University Press, 1993, p. 167.
See Gideon Aran, ‘From Religious Zionism to Zionist Religion’, in Calvin Goldscheider and Jacob Neusner (eds), Social Foundations of Judaism, Prentice Hall, 1990, p. 267.
See Laura S. Zarembski, ‘Israel’s Religious Right — Not a Monolith’, Middle East Quarterly, 7 (2), June 2000, pp. 23–31.
See David Biale, ‘Zionism’, in Lindsay Jones (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion, Macmillan, 2005, Vol. 15, pp. 9982–6.
See Samuel Heilman, ‘Guides of the Faithful: Contemporary Religious Zionist Rabbis’, in A. Scott Appleby (ed.), The Spokesmen for the Despised: Fundamentalist Leaders of the Middle East, University of Chicago Press, 1997, pp. 328–31.
See Moshe Hellinger, ‘Political Theology in the Thought of Merkaz HaRav Yeshiva and its Profound Influence on Israeli Politics and Society since 1967’, Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 9 (4), 2008, pp. 533–50.
Gershom Scholem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, Schocken Books, 1996, p. 261.
See Gershom Scholem, On the Mystical Shape of the Godhead: Basic Concepts in the Kabbalah, Schocken Books, 1991, pp. 82–7.
David Biale, ‘Gershom Scholem on Jewish Messianism’, in Marc Saperstein (ed.), Essential Papers on Messianic Movements and Personalities in Jewish History, New York University Press, 1992, pp. 525–9.
See David Hartman, Israelis and the Jewish Tradition: An Ancient People Debating its Future, Yale University Press, 1984, pp. 32–3.
Gideon Aran, ‘The Gospel of the Gush: Redemption as Catastrophe’, in Emmanuel Sivan and Menachem Friedman (eds), Religious Radicalism and Politics in the Middle East, State University of New York Press, 1990, p. 163.
Words of Rabbi Kook reported in David Samson and Tzvi Fishman, Torat Eretz Yisrael: The Teachings of HaRav Tzvi Yehuda HaCohen Kook, TEY Publications, 1991.
See R. J. Zwi Werblowsky, Beyond Tradition and Modernity: Changing Religions in a Changing World, Athlone, 1976, pp. 56–7.
See Eliezer Schweid, The Land of Israel: National Home or Land of Destiny, Associated University Presses, 1985, pp. 15–32.
See Uriel Tal, ‘Contemporary Hermeneutics and Self-Views on the Relationship between State and Land’, in Lawrence A. Hoffman (ed.), The Land of Israel: Jewish Perspectives, Notre Dame University Press, 1986, pp. 321–5.
Quoted in Arthur Hertzberg, The Zionist Idea: A Historical Analysis and Reader, Doubleday, 1959, pp. 420–1.
See Eliezer Don-Yehiya, ‘The Negation of Galut in Religious Zionism’, Modern Judaism, 12 (2), 1992, pp. 129–55.
See Robert Paine, ‘Topophilia, Zionism, and “Certainty”: Making a Place out of the Space that Became Israel Again’, in Wendy James (ed.), The Pursuit of Certainty: Religious and Cultural Formulations, Routledge, 1995, pp. 172–3.
See Lionel Kochan, ‘The Messianic Society: A Jewish Utopia’, in Arthur Cohen and Paul Mendes-Flohr (eds), Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought, Simon and Schuster, 1988, pp. 1033–7.
See David Ohana, Political Theologies in the Holy Land: Israeli Messianism and its Critics, Routledge, 2009, pp. 77–80.
Abraham Isaac Kook’s statement, ‘The Morality of Holiness’, is reported in Michael Walzer (ed.), The Jewish Political Tradition, Vol. 1: Authority, Yale University Press, 2000, p. 480.
See Jacob Talmon, The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy, Penguin, 1952, pp. 40–2.
Quoted in Mary R. Habeck, Knowing the Enemy: Jihadist Ideology and the War on Terror, Yale University Press, 2006, pp. 57–62.
Uriel Tal, ‘Foundations of a Political Messianic Trend’, Jerusalem Quarterly, 35, 1985, pp. 44–55.
Gershom Gorenberg, The End of Days: Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 111.
Quoted in Uri Ram, The Globalization of Israel: McWorld in Tel Aviv, Jihad in Jerusalem, Routledge, 2008, p. 225.
See Todd Samuel Presner’s study, Muscular Judaism: The Jewish Body and the Politics of Regeneration, Routledge, 2007.
See Motti Inbari, ‘Fundamentalism in Crisis: The Response of the Gush Emunim Rabbinical Authorities to the Theological Dilemmas Raised by Israel’s Disengagement Plan’, Journal of Church and State, 4, 2007, p. 708.
See Samuel Peleg, Zealotry and Vengeance: Quest of a Religious Identity Group, Lexington Books, 2002, pp. 109–17.
See Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, Despair and Deliverance: Private Salvation in Contemporary Israel, State University of New York Press, 1992, pp. 134–48.
See Myron Aronoff, Israeli Visions and Divisions: Cultural Change and Political Conflict, Rutgers University Press, 1989, pp. 85–7.
Anthony Wallace, ‘Revitalization Movements’ in Robert S. Grumet (ed.), Anthony F. C. Wallace, Revitalization and Mazeways: Essays on Cultural Change, Nebraska University Press, 2003, Vol. 1, pp. 11–16.
See Benjamin Barber, Jihad vs McWorld: Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy, Corgi Books, 2001, pp. xii-xxxv.
See John Gray, Al Qaeda and What it Means to be Modern, Faber and Faber, 2003, p. 76.
See Roger Griffin’s lecture notes, ‘The Way of the Terrorist: Reflections on Terrorism’s Relationship to Modernity’, Central European University, Budapest, 15 October 2010. I thank the author for letting me read his notes.
See Martin Seliger, Ideology and Politics, Free Press, 1976, p. 120.
Motti Inbari, Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple?, State University of New York Press, 2009, pp. 51–3.
Janet Aviad, ‘The Contemporary Israeli Pursuit of the Millennium’, Religion, 14, 1984, pp. 199–222.
On Yehuda Etzion’s theocratic post-Zionism and its relation to mainstream Religious Zionism, see Inbari, Jewish Fundamentalism, pp. 51–77; Ehud Sprinzak, The Ascendance of Israel’s Radical Right, Oxford University Press, 1991, pp. 94–9; and
Ehud Sprinzak, Brother against Brother: Violence and Extremism in Israeli Politics, Free Press, 1999, pp. 155–65.
Colin Chapman, Whose Promised Land? The Continuing Crisis over Israel and Palestine, Lion, 2002, pp. 134–5.
See Ron E. Hassner, War on Sacred Grounds, Cornell University Press, 2010, pp. 114–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Carlo Aldrovandi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aldrovandi, C. (2014). Jewish Religious Zionism. In: Apocalyptic Movements in Contemporary Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316844_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316844_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32761-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31684-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)