Advertisement

‘Reformers No Rioters’: British Radicalism and Mob Identity in the 1790s

Chapter

Abstract

On 27 August 1794, Lydia Hardy — the wife of the founder of the London Corresponding Society (LCS), Thomas Hardy — died within hours of giving birth to a stillborn baby. Two days later, when the impending funeral of Mrs Hardy was discussed at a meeting of a central committee of the LCS, one prominent member — James Parkinson, a physician probably best remembered for first describing what is now known as Parkinson’s disease — raised the question of whether or not the LCS should make an effort to be represented en masse at the mournful event. Another member opposed the idea, arguing that it gave ‘an opportunity to our Enemies to observe upon our calling together so great a Number of people as would attend that it indicated the Society’s inclination upon every occasion offer’d, to collect a Mob, and to renew the tumults and riots which had so lately prevailed’.1 This apprehension about the potential for the LCS to be publicly perceived as a mob ultimately informed and shaped the LCS’s official instructions for the funeral of Lydia Hardy. There was no call for a collective gathering of the LCS, and it was ‘recommended to each Member who knew Citizens that meant to attend the funeral earnestly to recommend to them to behave peaceably and becoming the solemnity of the occasion’. When it was all over, the LCS wanted to avoid any risk of a disturbance and recommended those members who did attend should ‘disperse each to his own home immediately after the funeral’.2

Keywords

French Revolution British Library British Radical Collective Violence Habeas Corpus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    See Roger Schofield, ‘Did the Mothers Really Die? Three Centuries of Maternal Mortality in “the World We Have Lost”’, in The World We Have Gained, ed. Lloyd Bonfield et al. (Oxford, 1986), pp. 230–60;Google Scholar
  2. and Adrian Wilson, ‘The Perils of Early Modern Procreation: Childbirth With or Without Fear?’, Journal of Eighteenth-Century Studies, 16 (1993), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    Thomas Hardy, Memoir of Thomas Hardy, Tounder of, and Secretary to, the London Corresponding Society (London, 1832), in Testaments of Radicalism: Memoirs of Working Class Politicians 1790–1885, ed. David Vincent (London, 1977), p. 60.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Gerald Jordan and Nicholas Rogers, ‘Admirals as Heroes: Patriotism and Liberty in Hanoverian England’, Journal of British Studies, 28 (1989), p. 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.
    On the treason trials of 1794, see Alan Wharam, The Treason Trials, 1794 (Leicester, 1992);Google Scholar
  6. and John Barrell, Imagining the King’s Death: Tigurative Treason, Tantasies of Regicide 1793–1796 (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Robert Shoemaker, The London Mob: Violence and Disorder in Eighteenth-Century England (London and New York, 2004), p. 153.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    James Epstein, ‘Equality and No King: Sociability and Sedition: The Case of John Frost’, in Romantic Sociability: Social Networks and Literary Culture in Britain 1770–1840, ed. Gillian Russell and Clara Tuite (Cambridge, 2002), p. 49.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Patricia A. Adler and Peter Adler, Constructions of Deviance: Social Power, Context, and Interaction, 3rd ed. (Belmont, 2000), p. 12.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Conciones ad Populum, in Lectures 1795 on Politics and Religion, ed. Lewis Patton and Peter Mann (Princeton and London, 1971), p. 52.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Charles Pigott, A Political Dictionary: Explaining the True Meaning of Words (London, 1795), p. 79. On Pigott,Google Scholar
  12. see Jon Mee, ‘Libertines and Radicals in the 1790s: The Strange Case of Charles Pigott I’, in Libertine Enlightenment: Sex, Liberty and Licence in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Peter Cryle and Lisa O’Connell (Basingstoke, 2004), pp. 183–203;Google Scholar
  13. and Jon Mee, ‘“A Bold and Outspoken Man”: The Strange Career of Charles Pigott II’, in Cultures of Whiggism: New Essays in English Literature and Culture in the Long Eighteenth Century, ed. David Womersley (Newark, 2005), pp. 330–50.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Alan Booth, ‘Popular Loyalism and Public Violence in the North-West of England, 1790–1800’, Social History, 8 (1983), p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 17.
    See H.T. Dickinson, ‘Popular Conservatism and Militant Loyalism, 1789–1815’, in Britain and the Trench Revolution, 1789–1815, ed. H.T. Dickinson (London, 1989), pp. 103–25;Google Scholar
  16. and H.T. Dickinson, ‘Popular Loyalism in Britain in the 1790s’, in The Transformation of Political Culture: England and Germany in the Late Eighteenth Century, ed. Eckhart Hellmuth (Oxford, 1990), pp. 503–33.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    On the ‘unofficial terror’ of loyalism, see Michael T. Davis, ‘The British Jacobins and the Unoificial Terror of Loyalism in the 1790s’, in Terror: Prom Tyrannicide to Terrorism, ed. Brett Bowden and Michael T. Davis (Brisbane, 2008), pp. 92–113.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Christopher Wyvill to Samuel Shore, 28 December 1792, cited in Jenny Graham, The Nation, the Law and the King: Reform Politics in England 1789–1799, 2 vols. (Lanham and Oxford, 2000), I: p. 434.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Eckhart Hellmuth, ‘Alter Fox’s Libel Act: Or, How to Talk About the Liberty of the Press in the 1790s’, in Reactions to Revolutions: The 1790s and Their Aftermath, ed. Ulrich Broich et al. (Berlin, 2007), p. 139.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    Adrian Randall, Riotous Assemblies: Popular Protest in Hanoverian England (Oxford, 2006), p. 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.
    See R.B. Rose, ‘The Priestley Riots of 1791’, Past and Present, 18 (1960), pp. 68–88;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. G.M. Ditchfield, ‘The Priestley Riots in Historical Perspective’, Transactions of the Unitarian Historical Society, 20 (1991), pp. 3–16;Google Scholar
  23. David L. Wykes, ‘“The Spirit of Persecutors Exemplified”: The Priestley Riots and the Victims of the Church and King Mobs’, Transactions of the Unitarian Historical Society, 20 (1991), pp. 17–39;Google Scholar
  24. Stephen Bygrave, ‘“I Predict a Riot”: Joseph Priestley and Languages of Enlightenment in Birmingham in 1791’, Romanticism, 18 (2012), pp. 70–88;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. and Jonathan Atherton, ‘Rioting, Dissent and the Church in Late Eighteenth Century Britain: The Priestley Riots of 1791’, PhD. thesis, University of Leicester (2012).Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    David R. Mansley Collective Violence, Democracy and Protest Policing (New York, 2014), p. 30.Google Scholar
  27. 28.
    Charles Tilly, ‘Collective Violence in European Perspective’, in Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr (Beverly Hills, 1969), pp. 4–42.Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    See E.P. Thompson, ‘Hunting the Jacobin Fox’, Past and Present, 142 (1994), pp. 94–140.Google Scholar
  29. 41.
    Malcolm I. Thomis and Peter Holt, Threats of Revolution in Britain 1789–1848 (London and Basingstoke, 1977), p. 23.Google Scholar
  30. 46.
    Mark Philp, Reforming Ideas in Britain: Politics and Language in the Shadow of the Trench Revolution, 1789–1815 (Cambridge, 2014), p. 81.Google Scholar
  31. 53.
    The Times, 17 October 1792. For a discussion of the ways in which the LCS constructed civility, see Michael T. Davis, ‘The Mob Club? The London Corresponding Society and the Politics of Civility in the 1790s’ in Unrespectable Radicals? Popular Politics in the Age of Reform, ed. Michael T. Davis and Paul A. Pickering (Aldershot, 2008), pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
  32. 54.
    On the Gordon Riots, see Nicholas Rogers’ essay in this collection and Ian Haywood and David Seed (eds), The Gordon Riots: Politics, Culture and Insurrection in Late Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge, 2012).Google Scholar
  33. 56.
    Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in Trance, ed. William B. Todd (1790; rpt. New York, 1959), pp. 27, 107–8.Google Scholar
  34. 57.
    David Bindman, Shadow of the Guillotine: Britain and the Trench Revolution (London, 1989), p. 118.Google Scholar
  35. 59.
    Herbert M. Atherton, ‘The “Mob” in Eighteenth-Century English Caricature’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 12 (1978), p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 60.
    James Epstein and David Karr, ‘Playing at Revolution: British “Jacobin” Performance’, Journal of Modern History, 79 (2007), p. 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 62.
    M.O. Grenby The Anti-Jacobin Novel: British Conservatism and the Trench Revolution (Cambridge, 2001), p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 65.
    Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in Trance, ed. L.G. Mitchell (1790; rpt. Oxford, 1999), p. 79.Google Scholar
  39. 67.
    Robert Malcolmson and Stephanos Mastoris, The English Pig: A History (London and New York, 2001), p. 6.Google Scholar
  40. 68.
    On the political meaning of porcine imagery and discourse in the eighteenth century, see Carl Fisher, ‘Politics and Porcine Representation: Multitudinous Swine in the British Eighteenth Century’, LIT: Literature Interpretation Theory, 10 (1999), pp. 303–26.Google Scholar
  41. 70.
    Mark Neocleous, ‘The Monstrous Multitude: Edmund Burke’s Political Teratology’, Contemporary Political Theory, 3 (2004), p. 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 72.
    John Drury ‘“When the Mobs Are Looking for Witches to Burn, Nobody Is Safe”: Talking About the Reactionary Crowd’, Discourse & Society, 13 (2002), p. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 73.
    See Gustave Le Bon, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (1895; rpt. New York, 2002);Google Scholar
  44. and David Waddington and Mike King, ‘The Disorderly Crowd: From Classical Psychological Reductionism to Socio-Contextual Theory’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44 (2005), pp. 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 81.
    Charles Tilly, Popular Contention in Great Britain 1758–1834 (Cambridge, MA, 1995), p. 214.Google Scholar
  46. 85.
    Cited in Paul Keen, The Crisis of Literature in the 1790s: Print Culture and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, 1999), p. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 86.
    Frida Knight, The Strange Case of Thomas Walker: Ten Years in the Life of a Manchester Radical (London, 1957), p. 170.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael T. Davis 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations