Abstract
Typically, a basic income guarantee (BIG) is defended either on the grounds that it decouples the ability to live a fulfilling life from the obligation to work (Van Parijs, 1991), or that it is a more palatable social safety net than traditional welfare programs (Handler and Babcock, 2006). These can be thought of as philosophical and microeconomic avenues of approach, respectively, and each is amply represented in this book. A somewhat less common framework for thinking about a BIG is to consider it as a macroeconomic policy. Examples of this approach include Mitchell and Watts (2004), who compare the macroeconomic consequences of a BIG to those of a job guarantee program, and Moutos and Scarth (2003), who consider the operation of a BIG in both an open and a closed economy. This chapter argues that the macroeconomic perspective is critical, given the dramatic and broadly distributed changes in household income resulting from a BIG, as well as its highly predictable structure. Most importantly for the purposes of this chapter, the fact that a BIG is a lump sum transfer guarantees that it has certain nondistortionary properties that are relevant for assessing its impact in an Austrian model of the macroeconomy.
* Daniel Kuehn is a doctoral student in American University’s Department of Economics. He is grateful to Guinevere Nell, Robert Thorpe, and Karen Vaughn for helpful comments on a draft of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Birnbaum, Simon. 2011. “Should Surfers Be Ostracized?: Basic Income, Liberal Neutrality, and the Work Ethos,” Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 10 (4): 396–419.
Cantillon, Richard. [1755] 1959. Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en Général. London, UK: Frank Cass and Co., Ltd.
Dang, Aimin. 2011. “Social Dividend Based on Overproduction,” Review of Radical Political Economy 43 (2): 216–29.
Federal Reserve Board. 2012. Federal Reserve Statistical Release: Money Stock Measures. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve.
Garrison, Roger. 2001. Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of the Capital Structure. New York: Routledge Foundations of the Market Economy Series.
—. 2005. “The Austrian School,” in Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane (eds.), Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development, and Current State. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Hagemann, Harald, and Hans-Michael Trautwein. 1998. “Cantillon and Ricardo Effects: Hayek’s Contributions to Business Cycle Theory,” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 5 (2): 292–316.
Handler, Joel and Amanda Sheely Babcock. 2006. “The Failure of Workfare: Another Reason for a Basic Income Guarantee,” Basic Income Studies 1 (1) 1–22.
Hayek, Friedrich. 1941. The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 1967 [1931]. Prices and Production. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.
—. 1981. Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 1985 [1931]. “Richard Cantillon,” Micheál Ó Súilleabháin (trans.), The Journal of Libertarian Studies VII (2): 217–47. Republished.
Horwitz, Steve. 2006. “Monetary Disequilibrium Theory and Austrian Macroeconomics: Further Thoughts on a Synthesis,” in Roger Koppl (ed.), Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager. New York: Routledge, pp. 166–85.
Mankiw, N. Gregory, Matthew Weinzieral, and Danny Yagan. 2009. “Optimal Taxation in Theory and Practice,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (4): 147–74.
Mitchell, W. F. and M. J. Watts. 2004. “Comparison of the Macroeconomic Consequences of Basic Income and Job Guarantee Schemes,” Rutgers Journal of Law and Urban Policy (2): 1–24.
Moss, Laurence S. and Karen I. Vaughn. 1986. “Hayek’s Ricardo Effect: A Second Look,” History of Political Economy 18 (4): 545–65.
Moutos, Thomas and William Scarth. 2003. “Some Macroeconomic Consequences of Basic Income and Employment Subsidies,” CESifo Working Paper Series (916).
O’ Driscoll, Gerald P. 1977. Economics as a Coordination Problem: The Contributions of Friedrich A. Hayek. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.
Subrick, J. Robert. 2010. “Money Is Non-Neutral,” in Peter Boettke (ed.), Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 111–23.
Thornton, Mark. 2006. “Cantillon on the Cause of the Business Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9 (3): 45–60.
US Census Bureau. 2012. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Available at: http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012edition.html.
Van Parijs, Phillipe. 1991. “Why Surfers Should Be Fed: The Liberal Case for an Unconditional Basic Income,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (2): 101–31.
White, Larry. 1999. “Hayek’s Monetary Theory and Policy: A Critical Reconstruction,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 31 (1): 109–20.
Wickens, Michael. 2008. Macroeconomic Theory: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Widerquist, K. and M. Lewis. 1997. “An Efficiency Argument for the Guaranteed Income.” Working Paper 212, The Jerome Levy Economics Institute.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Guinevere Liberty Nell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuehn, D. (2013). The BIG as a Helicopter Drop “with Austrian Characteristics”. In: Nell, G.L. (eds) Basic Income and the Free Market. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315939_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315939_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44261-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31593-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)