Advertisement

Difficult Relations in the 1920s — of Reparations, Debts and ‘Rumo(u)rs of War’

  • Andrew J. Williams
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)

Abstract

The 1920s were a period of huge disappointment in international relations, but also of huge hope. The Great War had shaken faith in the possibility of a liberal international order to its core but also made a whole generation on both sides of the Atlantic determined not to let such a war erupt again. The lessons drawn from the war were diverse and often contradictory. But while we now see the period as the forerunner of the far worse 1930s and the horrors of the Second World War, the thinkers of the then nascent profession of academic IR, ‘the thinkers of the twenty years’ crisis’ and the policy actors of Europe and beyond were far less sure that it would all end in tears.1 This was, after all, a time of great ‘live’ experimentation with new nations (of which there were many), institutions (most notably the League of Nations), and new national relationships in the context of a much changed balance of global power. The ‘liberal internationalism’ promulgated by Woodrow Wilson had taken root in Britain among many of the intellectuals and policy makers of left and right, in such institutions as the League of Nations Union (LONU), founded in 1918, as well as in the rump of the Liberal Party, in the Labour Party and sections of the Conservative Party. However, the focus of these new groups, and the continuing influence of older bodies like the Union of Democratic Control and Round Table was both a reflection of the enduring belief in the need for international cooperation and simultaneously what Michael Pugh sees as ‘a crisis of faith in liberalism as well as of international order’.2

Keywords

Labour Party Conservative Party Optional Protocol Ally Cooperation Debt Forgiveness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    M. Pugh, Liberal Internationalism: The Interwar Movement for Peace in Britain (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), p. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    B.J.C. McKercher (ed.) Anglo-American Relations in the 1920’s: The Struggle for Supremacy (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 1990);Google Scholar
  3. F. Venn, ‘Anglo-American Relations and Middle East Oil, 1918–34’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 1, No. 2, July 1990, pp. 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    E. Goldstein and J. Maurer (eds), The Washington Conference, 1921–22: Naval Rivalry, EastAsian Stability and the Road to Pearl Harbor (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    D. Crockett, German Post-Expressionism: The Art of the Great Disorder, 1918–1924 (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press, 1999), p. xvii.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    J. Jacobson, Locarno Diplomacy: Germany and the West, 1925–1929 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  7. See also S. Marks, The Illusion of Peace: International Relations in Europe, 1918–1933 (London: Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    E. Grossmann, Methods of Economic Rapprochement (Geneva: League of Nations, 1926), p. 7.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    M. Thomas, The French Empire between the Wars: Imperialism, Politics and Society (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005),Google Scholar
  10. and D. Dilks (ed.), Retreat from Power: Studies in Britain’s Foreign Policy of the Twentieth Century, 2 vols (London: Macmillan, 1981).Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    J. Clements, Prince Saionji: Japan (London: Haus Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    R. Daniels, The Politics of Prejudice: The Anti-Japanese Movement in California and the Struggle for Japanese Exclusion (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    J.B. Scott, The United States and France — Some Opinions on International Gratitude (New York: Oxford University Press, 1926). The other quotes are taken from Ashworth, International Relations and the Labour Party, pp. 60–63.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    E.D. Morel, The Horror on the Rhine (London: UDC, 1921); Ponsonby to Morel, 30 August 1921, and 1923 (n.d.) Morel Papers, BLPES, F8/123.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Clavin, The Great Depression in Europe, chapters 1 and 2. See also A. Fergusson, When Money Dies: The Nightmare of De ficit Spending, Devaluation and Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany (London: Public Affairs, 2010); Ahamed, Lords of Finance.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    C. Maier, Recasting Bourgeois Europe: Stabilization in France, Germany and Italy in the Decade after World War I (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), pp. 136–137, 208.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Chamberlain to Sir Hugh Levick (Bradbury’s Second-in-Command on the Reparations Commission) 20 August 1920, NA T194/6; Bradbury to H. Fass, Treasury, 11 June 1920, NA T194/5. See also A. Williams, ‘Sir John Bradbury and the Reparations Commission, 1920–25’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 13, No. 3, September 2002, pp. 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 19.
    N. Jordan, “The reorientation of French diplomacy in the mid-1920s: the role of Jacques Seydoux” The English Historical Review, Vol. 473, No. 17, 2002, pp. 867–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 23.
    M. Trachtenberg, Reparations in World Politics, France and European Economic Diplomacy, 1916–1923 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980). See also: Williams, Liberalism and War, chapter 3.Google Scholar
  20. 31.
    A. Wendt, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It; The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, Spring 1992, pp. 391–425;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Lowes Dickinson, The International Anarchy, 1904–1914 (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1926).Google Scholar
  22. 38.
    Jusserand to Pichon, 22 October 1919, relating a discussion with former Ambassador Morgenthau, MAE, Série B, Etats-Unis, 1918–1929, Box 38. See also: H. Morgenthau, Sr., Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story (New York: Doubleday, 1918).Google Scholar
  23. 42.
    Chamberlain to Eyre Crowe (Permanent Under-Secretary, Foreign Office), 16 February 1925 (the year of his death), quoted by R.J.Q. Adams, British Politics and Foreign Policy in the Age of Appeasement: 1935–39 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993), p. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. See also S.E. Crowe, ‘Sir Eyre Crowe and the Locarno Pact’, The English Historical Review, Vol. 87, No. 342, January 1972, pp. 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 48.
    Ahamed, Lords of Finance, p. 138, and chapter 8, ‘Uncle Shylock: War Debts’. Ahamed is here quoting Strong to Leffingwell, 30 August 1919, in turn quoted in L.V. Chandler, Benjamin Strong (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 1958), p. 144.Google Scholar
  26. 51.
    J.M. Keynes, Activities, 1914–1919 (London: Macmillan, 1971), p. 471.Google Scholar
  27. 53.
    Markwell, John Maynard Keynes, p. 96. See also D. Moggeridge, Maynard Keynes: An Economist’s Biography (London: Macmillan, 1979), pp. 354–356.Google Scholar
  28. 58.
    MacFadyean to Levick, 15 March 1922, MacFadyean Papers, BLPES; A. MacFadyean Recollected in Tranquility (London: Pall Mall Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  29. 60.
    S. Baker, Wilson and the World Settlement, Vol. 2 (New York: Doubleday, 1923), p. 335.Google Scholar
  30. 62.
    The most celebrated example was E. Mantoux, The Carthaginian Peace, or The Economic Consequences of Mr. Keynes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946).Google Scholar
  31. 66.
    ‘Reparation in Kind: Memorandum prepared in the Treasury’, NA CAB 27/72, 16 November 1921; Ashworth, International Relations and the Labour Party, p. 51; D. Lloyd George, The Truth about the Peace Treaties (London: Gollancz, 1938), p. 465.Google Scholar
  32. 68.
    M. Hogan, Informal Entente: The Private Structure of Cooperation in Anglo-American Economic Diplomacy (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1977), pp. 1–6, 11–17.Google Scholar
  33. 69.
    See C. Fink, The Genoa Conference (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1984);Google Scholar
  34. and C. Fink, A. Frohn and J. Heideking (eds), Genoa, Rapallo and European Reconstruction in 1922 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  35. 71.
    E.F. Wise, ‘The Anglo-Russian Trade Agreement of 1921’ Soviet Union Monthly, 15 July 1926. See also C. White, British and American Commercial Relations with the Soviet Union, 1918–1924 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992), and Williams, Trading with the Bolsheviks, chapter 2.Google Scholar
  36. 72.
    N.E. Saul, Friends or Foes? The United States and Russia, 1921–1941 (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2006), p. 80 and chapter 2, ‘Relief’.Google Scholar
  37. 73.
    Williams, Trading with the Bolsheviks, chapter 1. The ‘inconsistency’ thesis is most notable in J. Hoff Wilson, American Business and Foreign Policy, 1920–1933 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1971); and Ideology and Economics: U.S. Relations with the Soviet Union, 1918–1933 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  38. 77.
    H. Aufricht, A Guide to League of Nations Publications, 1920–47 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1951), p. 212.Google Scholar
  39. 78.
    On Austria: League of Nations, Financial Reconstruction of Austria: Report of the Financial Committee of the Council (London: Constable, 1921), pp. 21, 12; and ‘The Financial Reconstruction of Austria: General Survey and Principal Documents’, Geneva, 1926 [League of Nations C.568.M232.1926.II]; Report by the same Committee ‘The Financial Reconstruction of Hungary’, December 1926 [League of Nations C.583.M.221.1926.II], all League of Nations Archives, Geneva.Google Scholar
  40. 79.
    League of Nations (signed J.A. Salter), ‘The Settlement of Greek Refugees’, confidential memo of 10 October 1924, League of Nations C.524.M.187.1924.II; and League of Nations, The Settlement of Greek Refugees: Scheme for an International Loan (Geneva: League of Nations, 1924), p. 14.Google Scholar
  41. 80.
    G. Stresemann, His Diaries, Letters and Papers (London: Macmillan and Co., 1935), pp. 321–322.Google Scholar
  42. 85.
    G. Johnson, ‘“Das Kind” Revisited: Lord D’Abernon and German Security Policy, 1922–1925’, Contemporary European History, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2000, pp. 209–224, 209–211, 216–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 87.
    D. Kitzinger, ‘Towards a Model of Transnational Agency: The Case of Dietrich von Hildebrand’, International History Review, December 2011, pp. 669–686.Google Scholar
  44. 91.
    Williams, ‘Sir John Bradbury and Reparations’, p. 97; C.G. Dawes, A Journal of Reparations (London: Macmillan and Co., 1939), entry for 10 January 1924, p. 14.Google Scholar
  45. 94.
    N.M. Butler, Is America Worth Saving? Addresses on National Problems and Party Policies (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1920), p. ix.Google Scholar
  46. 95.
    N.M. Butler, The Faith of a Liberal: Essays and Addresses on Political Principles and Public Policies (New York: Scribner’s Sons, 1924); Building the American Nation: An Essay of Interpretation (New York: Scribner’s Sons, 1926).Google Scholar
  47. 101.
    J.T. Shotwell, The Great Decision (New York: Macmillan, 1944), p. 3.Google Scholar
  48. 103.
    K. Kautsky, Outbreak of the World War (Oxford: Carnegie Endowment, 1924).Google Scholar
  49. 104.
    I.F.W. Beckett, American Historical Review, Volume 111, No. 3, June 2006, p. 911.Google Scholar
  50. 106.
    B. Kuklick, Blind Oracles: Intellectual and War from Kennan to Kissinger (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  51. 111.
    A. Ponsonby, Falsehood in Wartime: Propaganda Lies of the First World War (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1928).Google Scholar
  52. 115.
    For a good analysis of this see L. Ashworth, ‘Did the Realist — Idealist Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations’, International Relations, Vol. XVI, No. 1, 2002, pp. 33–51, and; J. Haslam, The Vices of Integrity: E.H. Carr, 1892–1982 (London: Verso 1999).Google Scholar
  53. 120.
    Liberal Party, Britain’s Industrial Future: Report of the Liberal Industries Inquiry (London: Ernest Benn, 1928, 1977).Google Scholar
  54. 121.
    R. Skideisky, Politicians and the Slump: The Labour Government of 1929–31 (London: Macmillan, 1967), p. xii.Google Scholar
  55. See also P. Williamson, ‘Safety First: Baldwin, the Conservative Party and the 1929 General Election’, The Historical Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, 1982, pp. 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 123.
    E. Clémentel, La France et la Politique économique interalliée (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1931);Google Scholar
  57. R. Marjolin, Architect of European Unity: Memoirs, 1911–1986 (London: Weidenfield and Nicholson, 1989).Google Scholar
  58. 124.
    P. Bauchet, La Planification FranÇaise: quinze ans d’expérience (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1962), pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
  59. 126.
    R. Luce-Gilson, Le corporatisme; est — il valable? (Paris: Les Editions Georges Rochat, n.d. probably 1925), ‘Avant — propos’.Google Scholar
  60. 127.
    K. Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1944) (London: Beacon, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 128.
    François Perrou, Contribution a l’Etude de l’Economie et des Finances Publiques de l’Italie depuis la Guerre, quoted by A. Bowley, Some Economic Consequences of the Great War (London: Thornton Butterworth, 1930).Google Scholar
  62. 139.
    C.L. Mowat, Britain Between the Wars (London: Methuen, 1955), p. 142;Google Scholar
  63. D. Marquand, Ramsay MacDonald (London: Jonathan Cape, 1977), p. 2.Google Scholar
  64. 145.
    E.J. Phelan, Albert Thomas et la création du B.I.T. (Paris: Grasset, 1936) [Also published as Yes and Mr. Thomas, 1936], p. 53.Google Scholar
  65. 146.
    G.P. Pink, The Conference of Ambassadors: Paris 1920–1923; Its History, the Theoretical Aspect of Its Work, and Its Place in International Organization (Geneva: Geneva Research Centre, Vol. XII, Nos. 4–5. 1942).Google Scholar
  66. 147.
    G. Clemenceau, Grandeurs et misères de la Victoire (Paris: Perrin, 1930, 2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew J. Williams 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.School of International RelationsUniversity of St AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations