Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations ((SID))

  • 186 Accesses

Abstract

The great American liberal President Seth Low of Columbia University wrote to his old friend the British liberal James Bryce in July 1900 that: ‘[t]he cen-tury is coming to its end here among many dark clouds, bloodshed, hatred of nations, a general lowering of the ideas which you and I were bought up forty years ago to cherish’.1 They both understood that the Western civilization they knew and loved was being severely challenged by modernity. The ‘Great War’ of 1914–1918 proved to be its nemesis, a conflict that it is widely accepted bought about a seminal shift in power and influence away from the ‘old’ world of Europe and towards the ‘new’ of the Americas, and especially towards the United States of America itself. This chapter will discuss how even in the supposedly golden period of European dominance that ended in 1914 the balance of power was already swinging from the European shore of the Atlantic towards the American.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a discussion of the British nineteenth century view on this see: D. Bell, The Idea of a Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.K. Hazelden, Daily Mirror, 4 July 1905: British Cartoon Archive, University of Kent, Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. de Tocqueville, The Ancien Regime and the French Revolution (London: Penguin, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bloch, ‘Discussing Impressionism’ in Das Wort, in 1938, reprinted in R. Taylor (ed.) Aesthetics and Politics (London: New Left Books, 1977), p. 44;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust (London: Polity, 1991), p. xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For the United States’ imperial designs before 1900 see R. Kagan, Dangerous Nation: America and the World, 1600–1898 (London: Atlantic Books, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. LaFeber, The American Age: United States Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad since 1750 (New York: Norton, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. and R. Van Alstyne, The Rising American Empire (Oxford: Blackwell, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.A. Hobson, Imperialism: A Study (London: Nisbet, 1902);

    Google Scholar 

  10. H.N. Brailsford, The War of Steel and Gold: A Study of the Armed Peace, 9th edition (London: Bell, 1917), pp. 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Dangerfield, The Strange Death of Liberal England (London: Transaction Publishers, 2011) (first published 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quoted by R. Shattuck, The Banquet Years: The Origins of the Avant-Garde in France: 1885 to World War I (London: Jonathan Cape, 1969), p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Sternhell, La droite révolutionaire: Les origines françaises du fascisme (Paris: Seuil, 1978), p. 15;

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Winock, La Belle Epoque (Paris: Perrin, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Whalan, American Culture in the 1910s (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shattuck, Banquet Years, p. 5; M. Barrès, Les déracinés (Paris: Bibliothèque Charpentier, 1897).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Winock, Edouard Drumont et Cie: antisémitisme et fascisme en France (Paris: Seuil, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Vinen, A History in Fragments: Europe in the Twentieth Century (London: Abacus, 2002), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Baechler, J. Hall and M. Mann, Europe and the Rise of Capitalism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Gentile, L’Apocalypse de la modernité: La Grande Guerre et l’homme nouveau (Paris: Aubire, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. Field, Three French Writers and the Great War: Barbusse, Drieu La Rochelle, Bernanos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Winock, Le siècle des intellectuels (Paris: Seuil, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. J. Mayer, The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War (London: Croom Helm, 1981), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The best introductions are by D. Judd, Empire: The British Imperial Experience, from 1765 to the Present (London: Fontana, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Hyam, Britain’s Imperial Centuiy, 1815–1914: A Study of Empire and Expansion (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. and B. Porter, The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism 1850–1990, 23rd edn (London: Pearson, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Nasson, Britannia’s Empire: A Short History of the British Empire (London: The History Press, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. E. Devine, To the Ends of the Earth: Scotland’s Global Diaspora, 1750–2010 (London: Allen Lane, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Gallagher and R. Robinson, ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’, The Economic History Review, Second series, Vol. VI, no. 1 (1953), pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  30. T. Akami, Japan’s News Propaganda and Reuter’s News Empire in Northeast Asia, 1870–1934 (Dordrecht: Republic of Letters, 2012), esp.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Introduction and chapter 1. See also D. Read, The Power of News, The History of Reuters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  32. I. Parmar, Think Tanks and Power in Foreign Policy, and ‘Anglo-American Elites in the Interwar Years: Idealism and Power in the Intellectual Roots of Chatham, House and the Council for Foreign Relations’, International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1, April 2002, pp. 53–76. See also, for a Marxist interpretation of this phenom-enon: K. van der Pijl, Transnational Classes and International Relations (London: Routledge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quoted by P. Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Challenge and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987), p. 229,

    Google Scholar 

  34. and P. Doerr, British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. Gorman, Imperial Citizenship: Empire and the Question of Belonging (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  36. I. Clark, Hegemony in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), esp. chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mark Mazower, in a review of R. Holland, Blue-Water Empire: The British in the Mediterranean since 1800 (London: Allen Lane, 2012), Financial Times, 21/22 January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  38. McLynn , 1759: The Year Britain Became Master of the World (London: Pimlico, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Parry, The Politics of Patriotism: English Liberalism, National Identity and Europe, 1830–1886 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. For one seminal treatment of this see D. C. Platt, Finance, Trade and Politics in British Foreign Policy, 1815–1914 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968),

    Google Scholar 

  41. and a review of this by Zara Steiner in The Historical Journal, Vol. XIII, No. 3, 1970, pp. 545–568.

    Google Scholar 

  42. W.H. Parker, Halford Mackinder: Geography as an Aid to Statecraft (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  43. H. Mackinder, Our Own Islands: An Elementary Study in Geography (London: Philip, 1906);

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Mackinder, Distant Lands (London: Philip, 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  45. See also D. Deudney, Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  46. P.P. O’Brien, ‘Herbert Hoover, Anglo-American Relations and Republican Party Politics in the 1920s’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2011, pp. 200–218, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  47. See also J.E. Moser, Twisting the Lion’s Tail: Anglophobia in the United States 1921–1948 (London: Macmillan, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Carter, The Three Emperors: Three Cousins, Three Empires and the Road to World War One (London: Penguin, 2010), pp. 4, 16, 261–3;

    Google Scholar 

  49. M. Stibbe, German Anglophobia and the Great War, 1914–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  50. P. Kennedy, The Rise of Anglo-German Antagonism, 1860–1914 (London: Ashfield, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Wright, Gustav Stresemann: Weimar’s Greatest Statesman (Oxford: Oxford Unrversrty Press, 2002), pp. 71, 80–81, 106;

    Google Scholar 

  52. For a recent appreciation of Stresemann and pre-1945 Franco-German discussions about a united Europe see C. Fischer, ‘The Failed European Union: Franco-German Relations during the Great Depression of 1929–32’, The International Histoty Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, December 2012, pp. 705–724.

    Google Scholar 

  53. For example: H. James, The Portrait of a Lady (London: Macmillan, 1881);

    Google Scholar 

  54. E. Wharton, The House of Mirth (New York: Barnes and Noble, 2005) (originally published 1905).

    Google Scholar 

  55. S. Anderson, Race and Rapprochement: Anglo-Saxonism and Anglo-American Relations, 1895–1904 (Rutherford, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1981), p. 12,

    Google Scholar 

  56. quoted in J. Charmley, Churchill’s Grand Alliance: The Anglo-American Special Relationship, 1940–57 (London: John Curtis/Hodder and Stoughton, 1995), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  57. G. Bernstein, Liberalism and Liberal Politics in Edwardian England (London: Allen and Unwin, 1986), esp. chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  58. G. Scott-Smith, ‘Introduction: The Name Looms Large: The Legacies of Theodore Roosevelt’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2000, pp. 635–638, p. 635.

    Google Scholar 

  59. A. Roberts, A History of the English-Speaking Peoples since 1900 (London: Weidenfield and Nicholson, 2006), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. D. Gilmour, The Long Recessional: The Imperial Life of Rudyard Kipling (London: John Murray, 2002), pp. 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Reproduced in the Washington Post, 3 November 1902: R. J. Young, An American by Degrees: The Extraordinary Lives of Ambassador Jules Jusserand (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens’ University Press, 2009), pp. 25–26;

    Google Scholar 

  62. R. and I. Tombs, That Sweet Enemy: Britain and France, The History of a Love—Hate Relationship (New York: Vintage, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  63. D. Stevenson, French War Aims against Germany, 1914–1919 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  64. E. Cahm, The Dreyfus Affair in French Society and Politics (London: Longman, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  65. L. Derfler, The Dreyfus Affair (London: Greenwood, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  66. L. Begley, Why the Dreyfus Affair Matters (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010);

    Google Scholar 

  67. F. Brown, For the Soul of France: Culture Wars in the Age of Dreyfus (New York: Knopf, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  68. J.J. Cooke, The New French Imperialism 1880–1910: The Third French Republic and Colonial Expansion (Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1973), pp. 9–11, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  69. M. Barrès, Le Culte du Moi — I: Sous l’Oeil Des Barbares; II: Un Homme Libre; III: Le Jardin de Bérénice (Paris: Nouvelle Édition, 1910–1911). My thanks to Maia Woolner for this insight.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Charles Maurras in 1897, cited in M. Barrès and C. Maurras, Le République ou le Roi: Correspondance inédite, 1888–1923 (Paris: Plon, 1970), Frontispiece.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sternhell, La droite révolutionnaire en France, p. 33. See also Z. Sternhell, Maurice Barrès, et le nationalisme français (Paris: Colin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  72. F. G. Stambrook, ‘“Das Kind” — Lord D’Abernon and the Origins of the Locarno Pact’, Central European History, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1968, pp. 233–263.

    Google Scholar 

  73. D. Brown, ‘Palmerston and Anglo-French Relations, 1846–1865’ and T. G. Otte, ‘From “War-in-Sight” to Nearly War: Anglo-French Relations in the Age of High Imperialism, 1875–1898’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 17, No. 4, December 2006, pp. 675–692;

    Google Scholar 

  74. D. Bates, The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Encounter on the Nile (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  75. C. Andrew, Théophile Delcassé and the Making of the Entente Cordiale: A Reappraisal of French Foreign Policy, 1898–1905 (London: Macmillan, 1968),

    Google Scholar 

  76. and P.J.V. Rolo, Entente Cordiale: The Origins and Negotiation of the Anglo-French Agreements of 8 April 1904 (London: Macmillan, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  77. C. Geoffroy, Les coulisses de l’Entente cordiale (Paris: Grasset, 2004), pp. 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  78. See also, on the Boer War, document 3.11 (the Boer War) on French reactions to it: W. Fortescue (ed.), The Third Republic and France, 1870–1940: Conflicts and Continuities (London: Routledge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  79. P. Bell, ‘The Entente Cordiale and the Sea Serpent’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 17, No. 4, December 2006, pp. 636–637.

    Google Scholar 

  80. F. Winter, ‘Exaggerating the Efficacy of Diplomacy: The Marquis of Landsdowne’s “Peace Letter” of November 1917’, International History Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, March 2010, pp. 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Memorandum by Mr. Eyre Crowe: Memorandum on the Present State of British Relations with France and Germany, Foreign Office, 1 January 1907, F.O. 371/257, in G. P. Gooch and H. Temperley (eds), British Documents on the Origins ofthe War, Vol. III: The Testing of the Entente, 1904–1906 (London: H.M.S.O., 1928), Appendix A.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Various Confidential Print, Bowood Papers (Lansdowne), British Library Add MS 88906/22/15; see also I. Nish, The Anglo-Japanese Alliance: The Diplomacy of Two Island Empires, 1894–1907 (London: Athlone Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Winter, ‘Exaggerating the Efficacy …’, p. 26; Z. Steiner, Britain and the Origins of the First World War (London: Macmillan, 1977),

    Google Scholar 

  84. and (new edn) The Foreign Office and Foreign Policy, 1898–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), and W. Mulligan, ‘From Case to Narrative: The Marquis of Lansdowne, Sir Edward Grey and the Threat from Germany, 1900–1906’, International History Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2008, p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  85. L. Daudet, Hors du joug allemande: mesures d’après guerre (Paris: Nouvelle Librarie Nationale, 1915), pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Samuel to Morel, 3 October 1905, Morel Papers, BLPES, London, F8/125. See also E.D. Morel, King Leopold’s Rule in Africa (London: Heinemann, 1904);

    Google Scholar 

  87. A. Conan Doyle, The Crime of the Congo (1908) (London: Amazon Publishing, Balefire, 2012);

    Google Scholar 

  88. J. Conrad, Heart of Darkness (1902) (London: Penguin, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  89. N. Ascherson, The King Incorporated,• Leopold II and the Congo (London: Granta, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  90. M.R. Biddiss, The Age of the Masses: Ideas and Society in Europe since 1870 (New York: Harper and Row, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  91. A. Thorpe, A History of The British Labour Party (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  92. See also H. Pelling, The Origins of the Labour Party (London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  93. J. Edwards (ed.), The Labour Annual, 1900 (Brighton: The Harvester Press, 1971), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  94. A.N. Lyons, Robert Blatchtord: ‘The Sketch of a Personality: An Estimate ot J’ome Achievements (London: Clarion Press, 1910), pp. 97, 107–108;

    Google Scholar 

  95. R. Blatchford, Merrie England (London: Clarion Press, 1894).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Clemenceau was not only friendly with ‘marginal and eccentric figures … extreme radicals’ as he also knew Joseph Chamberlain: D. R. Watson, ‘Clemenceau’s Contacts with England’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2006, pp. 715–730, p. 716.

    Google Scholar 

  97. W. Kendall, The Revolutionary Movement in Britain, 1900–21 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  98. E. Halévy, Histoire du socialisme européen (Paris: Gallimard, 1974), pp. 250–251.

    Google Scholar 

  99. The best source for British syndicalism before 1914 is B. Holton, British Syndicalism, 1900–1914 (London: Pluto Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  100. For Mann see A. Thompson, The Empire Strikes Back? The Impact of Imperialism on Britain from the Mid-nineteenth Century (London: Longman, 2005), pp. 67–69

    Google Scholar 

  101. and C. Tsuzuki, Tom Mann, 1856–1914: The Challenges of Labour (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  102. G. Haw (with an Introduction by G.K. Chesterton), From Workhouse to Westminster-The Life Story of Will Crooks M.P. (London: Cassell, 1907).

    Google Scholar 

  103. C. F. Brand, British Labour’s Rise to Power (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1941), p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  104. R. Bellamy, Rethinking Liberalism (London: Continuum, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  105. L. Menand, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America (London: Harper Collins, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  106. D. Cortright, Peace: A History of Movements and Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), quoting James, p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  107. D. Pick, War Machine: The Rationalisation of Slaughter in the Modem Age (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), pp. 13–17,

    Google Scholar 

  108. quoting W. James, The Moral Equivalent of War (New York: American Association for International Conciliation, 1910), pp. 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Cortright, Peace, p. 6; C. Chatfield, The American Peace Movement: Ideals and Activism (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Carnegie Endowment, The Other Balkan Wars: A 1913 Carnegie Endowment Inquiry in Retrospect with a New Introduction and Reflections on the Present Conflict by George F. Kennan (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  111. T. J. Knock, To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  112. W. Millis, Road to War: America, 1914–1917 (New York: Faber and Faber, 1935), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  113. M. Mandelbaum, The Ideas that Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy and Free Markets in the Twenty-first Century (Oxford: Public Affairs, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Kagan, Dangerous Nation; W.R. Mead, Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (London: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Good overviews are: R. Zieger, American Workers, American Unions (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  116. M. Dubofsky and F.R. Dulles, Labor in America: A History (8th edn) (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Of which the most extensive history is by P.S. Foner, History of the Labor Movement in the United States, Vol. 4, The Industrial Workers of the World 1905–1917 (New York: International Publishers, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  118. R. Archer, Why Is There No Labor Party in the United States? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  119. J.H.M. Laslett, Labor and the Left; A Study of Socialist and Radical Influences in the American Labor Movement, 1881–1924 (New York: Basic Books, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  120. See A. Williams, Labour and Russia: The Attitude of the Labour Party to the Soviet Union, 1924–1934 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989), pp. 7–8. Henderson’s poem is in the Labour Party archives under HEN/14/3.

    Google Scholar 

  121. D.S.A. Bell, ‘Unity and difference: John Robert Seeley and the political theology of international relations’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, March, 2001, pp. 559–580.

    Google Scholar 

  122. The best overview of this group is by A. May, ‘The Round Table, 1910–1966’, D. Phil, University of Oxford, January 1995. See also P. Kramer, ‘Empires, Exceptions, and Anglo-Saxons: Race and Rule between the British and United States Empires, 1880–1910’, The Journal of American History, Vol. 88, 2002, pp. 1315–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  123. For Milner and Curtis see J. Marlowe, Milner: Apostle of Empire (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1976);

    Google Scholar 

  124. L. Curtis, With Lord Milner in South Africa (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  125. For Philip Kerr/Lord Lothian see P. Roberts (ed.), Lord Lothian and Anglo-American Relations (Dordrecht: Republic of Letters, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  126. M.G. Fry, And Fortune Fled: David Lloyd George, the First Democratic Statesman, 1916–1922 (New York: Peter Lang, 2011), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Fry, And Fortune Fled, p. 3; A. Lentin, Lloyd George, Woodrow Wilson and the Guilt of Germany (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  128. J. Morefield, Covenants without Swords: Idealist Liberalism and the Spirit of Empire (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  129. M. Ceadel, Pacifism in Britain, 1914–1945: The Defining of a Faith (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  130. See, for example, L. Ashworth, International Relations and the Labour Party: Intellectuals and Policy Making from 1918–1945 (London: I.B. Tauris, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  131. B. Porter, Critics of Empire: British Radical Attitudes towards Colonialism in Africa, 1895–1914, 2nd edition (London: I.B. Tauris, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  132. G. Claeys, Imperial Sceptics: British Critics of Empire, 1850–1920 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  133. This next section draws heavily on A. Williams, ‘Norman Angell and his French Contemporaries, 1905–1914’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 21, No. 4, December 2010, pp. 574–592.

    Google Scholar 

  134. N. Angell, The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to their Economic and Social Advantage (London: W. Heinemann, 1912).

    Google Scholar 

  135. M. Ceadel, Living the Great Illusion: Sir Norman Angell, 1872–1967 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 66, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Quoted in ibid., pp. 97, 98–103. N. Angell, Patriotism under Three Flags: A Plea for Rationalism in Politics (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1903), and Europe’s Optical Illusion (London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton and Kent, 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  137. Ceadel, Living the Great Illusion, pp. 93–94; Esher quoted in L. Ahamed, Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World (London: Penguin, 2009), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  138. On Esher see also: P. Fraser, Lord Esher: A Political Biography (London: Hart-Davis MacGibbon, 1973),

    Google Scholar 

  139. and; J. Lees-Milne, The Enigmatic Edwardian: The Life of Reginald, 2nd Viscount Esher (London: Sidgwick and Co., 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  140. D.K. Broster, Crouching at the Door: Strange and Macabre Tales (short stories) (London: Wordsworth editions, first pub 1942, 2007). My thanks to Terry Barringer for this gem.

    Google Scholar 

  141. E. Childers, The Riddle of the Sands: A Record of Secret Service (London: Penguin, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  142. G.T. Chesney, The Battle of Dorking: Reminiscences of a Volunteer (London: Dodo Press, 2008);

    Google Scholar 

  143. H.G. Wells, The War of the Worlds (London: Penguin, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  144. J. Buchan, The Thirty-Nine Steps (London: Penguin, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  145. N. Ferguson, The Pity of War (London: Allen Lane, 1998), p. 22, quoting Angell, The Great Illusion, p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  146. See S. Hazareesingh, Political Traditions in Modern France (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  147. R. Wohl, The Generation of 1914 (London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  148. P. Drieu La Rochelle, Socialisme fasciste (Paris: Gallimard, 1934), p. 209

    Google Scholar 

  149. quoted in P. Sérant, Le Romantisme fasciste (Paris: Fasquelle, 1959), p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  150. J. Talmon, Myth of the Nation and the Vision of Revolution: Ideological Polarisation in the Twentieth Century (London: Secker and Warburg, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Again, see Sternhell, La droite révolutionnaire en France; ‘Nicolas Sarkozy se sent “l’héritier” de Jaurès’ Le nouvel Observateur, 13 April 2007. See also J. Jackson, France: The Dark Years, 1940–1944 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), ‘Péguy’s Frances’, pp. 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  152. This discussion of Jaurès, Sorel and Péguy also draws heavily on my ‘Norman Angell and his French Contemporaries, 1905–1914’, op. cit. The best biography of Jaurès in English is still H. Goldberg, The Life of Jean Jaurès (New York: Madison, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  153. The context is best placed by G. Haupt, Socialism and the Great War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  154. J. Jaurès, L’Armée Nouvelle (Paris: Editions Sociales, 1915) and (Paris: Editions 10/18, 1969) with a Foreword by Madeleine Rebérioux, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  155. For more on this see L. Lévy (ed.), Jean Jaurès: Anthologie (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1946, 1983), pp. 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  156. G. Lefranc, Le movement socialiste sous la troisième république (Paris: Petite Bibliothèque Payot, 1977), pp. 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  157. P. Jackson, Beyond the Balance of Power: France and the Politics of National Security in the Era of the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  158. For a French appreciation of Mitrany, see G. Devin, ‘Que reste-t-il du fonction-nalisme international? Relire David Mitrany (1888–1975)’, Critique internationale 01/03, no. 38, 2008, pp. 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  159. L. Bourgeois, Solidarité (Paris: Armand Colin, 1896).

    Google Scholar 

  160. S. Audier, Leon Bourgeois: Fonder la solidarité (Paris: Editions Michalon, 2007), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  161. L. Bourgeois, Pour La Société des Nations (Paris: Fasquelle, 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  162. Woolf, International Government. See also P. Wilson, The International Theory of Leonard Woolf A Study in Twentieth Century Idealism (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  163. V. Glendinning, Leonard Woolf: A Biography (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  164. S. Brodziak and J.-N. Jeanneney, Georges Clemenceau: Correspondance (1858–1929) (Paris: Laffont/Bibliotheque Nationale de France, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Andrew J. Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, A.J. (2014). The Anglo-Saxons and the French: The Build-up to the First World War. In: France, Britain and the United States in the Twentieth Century 1900–1940. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315458_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics