Advertisement

Referendums in Asia

  • Masahiro Kobori

Abstract

There is a paradox in the practical use of referendums. In theory, a referendum is the closest one gets to pure democracy under a general system of representative democracy. In practice, however, in developing countries, ‘referendums have been utilized primarily by authoritarian regimes’ (Marques and Smith 1984: 103). Asia is a case in point. The largest continent on Earth is, arguably, the least democratic. According to a recent count, only six of the countries in the continent were regarded as fully fledged democracies — a ‘ratio worse than the worldwide average’ (Nathan 2012: 134). It is perhaps not surprising, therefore, that India and Japan, two of the most long-standing democracies on that continent, have yet to hold a nationwide referendum; and that Israel, another country with a strong — though not unblemished (Arieli-Horowitz 1993) — democratic record, falls into the same category. Asia, which ‘hosts some of the world’s most resilient authoritarian regimes’ (Nathan, ibid.), has held very few referendums, and many of those that have taken place have been held during the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, in Iran under Ayatollah Khomeini and in Syria under both Bashar and Hafez al-Assad. And, yet, this pattern is not uniform. North Korea, the most authoritarian regime in Asia, has not submitted any issues to plebiscites, whereas votes have been held in Taiwan and South Korea, two of the more democratic countries in that part of the world.

Keywords

Authoritarian Regime Liberal Democratic Party Direct Democracy Veto Player Comparative Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almond, G.A., Dalton, R.J., Powell, G.B. and Strøm, K. (2006) Comparative Politics Today: A World View, New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Aquino, B.A. (1988) ‘The Philippines in 1987: Beating Back the Challenge of August.’ Southeast Asian Affairs, Vol.2 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arieli-Horowitz, D. (1993) The Labyrinth of Legitimacy: Referendum in Israel, Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Blaydes, L. (2006) ‘Who Votes in Authoritarian Elections and Why? Determinants of Voter Turnout in Contemporary Egypt.’ Paper Presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 31 August–3 September 2006, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  5. Blount, J., Elkins, Z. and Ginsburg, T. (2012) ‘Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter?’ in Tom Ginsburg (Ed.) Comparative Constitutional Design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burghart, R. (1994) ‘The Political Culture of Panchayat Democracy.’ Nepal in the Nineties: Versions of the Past, Visions of the Future, 1–13.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, David and Ranney, Austin (1994) ‘Practice’, in Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (Eds), Referendums Around the World, Washington DC: AEI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conan Doyle, Arthur (1892) Silver Blaze, London: Strand Magazine.Google Scholar
  9. Day, S. (2006) ‘Barriers to Federal Democracy in Iraq: Lessons from Yemen.’ Middle East Policy, 13(3), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dicey, A.V. (1981) An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Friedrich, C.J. and Brzezinski, Z. (1956) Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Huang, D.W. (2006) ‘Did the 2004 “Peace Referendum” Contribute to the Consolidation of Taiwan’s Democracy?’ Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 143–176.Google Scholar
  13. Insel, Ahmet (2003) ‘The AKP and Normalizing Democracy in Turkey.’ The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(2), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kienle, E. (1995) ‘Arab Unity Schemes Revisited: Interest, Identity, and Policy in Syria and Egypt.’ International Journal of Middle East Studies, 27(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirkpatrick, D.D. (2012) ‘Morsi Admits Mistakes.’ The New York Times, 27 December 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Kobori, Masahiro (2009) ‘Referendums in Britain and Japan: Turnouts, Campaigns, and Systems.’ Ritsumeikan Law Review, Vol.26, 1–25.Google Scholar
  17. Kobori, Masahiro (2012) ‘Populism as Rhetorical Politics in Britain and Japan: “Devil take the hindmost”.’ JPSA Paper, 6 October 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Kokkai, Diet Record, http://www.kokkai.ndl.go.jp/.
  19. Komatsu, Komatsu (2009) ‘Chihou-Jichi-Tokubetsu-Hou no Seitei-Tetsuzuki nitsuite (As to procedures for the enactment of local autonomy special laws).’ Reference, October 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, Jih-Wen (2004) ‘Taiwan’s Referendum Act and the Stability of the Status Quo.’ Issues & Studies, 40(2) (June 2004), 119–153.Google Scholar
  21. Marques, A. and Smith, T.B. (1984) ‘Referendums in the Third World.’ Electoral Studies, 3(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nathan, A.J. (2012) ‘Confucius and the Ballot Box: Why “Asian Values” do not Stymie Democracy.’ Foreign Affairs, July/August, 134–139.Google Scholar
  23. Noble, L.G. (1976) ‘Philippines 1975: Consolidating the Regime.’ Asian Survey, 16, February, 178–185.Google Scholar
  24. Penniman, H. (1972) Elections in South Vietnam, Washington DC: AEI.Google Scholar
  25. Peretz, D. (1959) ‘Democracy and Revolution in Egypt.’ Middle East Journal, 13(1), 26–40.Google Scholar
  26. Phadnis, U. (1981) ‘Nepal: The Politics of Referendum.’ Pacific Affairs, 54(3), 431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qvortrup, M. (2014) Referendums and Ethnic Conflict, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rashiduzzaman (1978) ‘Bangladesh in 1977: Dilemmas of Military Rulers.’ Asian Survey, 18, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rowell, Milo E. (1945) ‘Report of Preliminary Studies and Recommendations of Japanese Constitution.’ Milo Rowell Papers on New Japanese Constitution, Doc. No. 1, 6 December (http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/03/046/046tx.html).Google Scholar
  30. Sato, Shunichi (2010) ‘Nihon niokeru Naimu-Sho Kanryo-Tachi no Senzen to Sengo (Officials in Home Department in Pre-War and Post-War Japan).’ Jichi-Soken, 377, March.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, Thomas B. (1986) ‘Referendum Politics in Asia.’ Asian Survey, 26(7), 793–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takayanagi, Kenzou (1972) Nihon-Koku Kenpou Seitei no Katei (Process of the Enactment of the Constitution of Japan, Volume 2), Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
  33. Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Institutions Work, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wintrobe, R. (2007) ‘Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches.’ In Carles Boix and Susan Stokes (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 363–394.Google Scholar

Newspapers and periodicals:

  1. Keesing’s Contemporary Archives Google Scholar
  2. New York Times Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Masahiro Kobori 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiro Kobori

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations