Advertisement

Referendums in Russia, the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe

  • Ronald J. Hill
  • Stephen White
Chapter

Abstract

The first time the people of the Soviet Union participated in a referendum also proved to be the last. On 17 March 1991, they were invited to decide on the very future of their country, in the form of a ‘renewed’ union. Some Soviet republics declined to participate, and others added further questions. On 1 December the people of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic precipitated the dismantling of the Soviet Union by using a republican referendum to confirm their wish for independence. Within days, the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus had signed an agreement to establish the Commonwealth of Independent States, rendering the future of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics void. Referendums in other parts of the Soviet ‘empire’ — the Baltic republics and Moldova — and in some of what had been Moscow’s satellites — Poland, for example — had already had significant historical impact. Such a development was scarcely considered a possibility in the centralized, Communist Party-dominated political system. It was certainly not politically relevant. Until the era of perestroika, glasnost’ and democratization in the late 1980s, the Soviet leaders never seemed to sense any need for such a device. However, in the post-Stalin era of ‘the rapid building of communism’ under Khrushchev, and later the period of ‘developed socialism’ under Brezhnev, there developed a substantial scholarly literature about the possibility of making use of this quintessentially democratic mechanism, and the constitutions of a number of Communist-ruled countries, including the Soviet Union itself, made provision for its use in certain circumstances.

Keywords

Daily Report Constitutional Amendment Soviet Republic Popular Vote Soviet Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argumenty i fakty, 2013. 21, p. 9.Google Scholar
  2. Brady, Henry E. and Cynthia S. Kaplan, 1994. ‘Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union’, pp. 174–217 in David Butler and Austen Ranney (Eds), Referendums Around theWorld: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bungs, Dzintra, 1992. ‘Latvia’, RFE/RL Research Report 1:27, pp. 62–66.Google Scholar
  4. Friedrich, Carl J. and Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1956. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Girnius, Saulius, 1992. ‘Lithuania’, RFE/RL Research Report 1:27, pp. 67–69.Google Scholar
  6. Khakimov, no date. ‘Tatarstan Path to Sovereignty’, a collection of documents compiled with preface by Raphael Khakimov, at http://www.kcn.ru/tat_en/politics/dfa/sover/sover.htm, accessed 10 January 2013.
  7. Kionka, Riina, 1992. ‘Estonia’, RFE/RL Research Report 1:27, pp. 57–61.Google Scholar
  8. Kotok, V. F., 1964. Referendum v sisteme sotsialisticheskoi demokratii. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, Paul G., 1994. Central Europe Since 1945. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Markus, Ustina, 1995. ‘Business as usual with Lukashenka’, Transition 1:8, pp. 57–61.Google Scholar
  11. Marples, David, 2004. ‘Belarus election results disputed’, Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, 1:109, 19 October 20040, at http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=27014, accessed 6 February 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Medvedev, Roy, 1972. Kniga o sotsialisticheskoi demokratii. Amsterdam: Alexander Herzen Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. —, 1975. On Socialist Democracy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Nohlen, Dieter and Philip Stöver (Eds), 2010. Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  15. Norwegian Helsinki Committee, 2009. ‘Azerbaijan: Referendum in an atmosphere of intimidation and fear. Statement on the referendum in the republic of Azerbaijan. 18 March 2009’, at http://www.humanrightshouse.org/Articles/10357.html, accessed 11 January 2013.Google Scholar
  16. Pehe, Jiri, 1992. ‘The referendum controversy in Czechoslovakia’, RFE/RL Research Report 1:43, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
  17. Petukhova, Natalia Valer’evna, 2010. ‘Pravovye ogranicheniya initsiirovaniya, naznacheniya i provedeniya referendumov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: ponyatie i sistema’, Gosudarstvo i pravo, 10, pp. 112–115.Google Scholar
  18. Poletz, Lida and Rostislav Khotin, 1995. ‘Belarus vote favors Russia ties’, The Moscow Times, 21 May, p. 17.Google Scholar
  19. RFE/RL, Albania, 1994. Reports on Albanian referendum of November 1994, RFE/RL Daily Report, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15 November, 1, 2, 5, 6 December.Google Scholar
  20. RFE/RL, Belarus, 1994. Reports on Belarusian proposal to remove president by referendum, RFE/RL Daily Report, 8 November.Google Scholar
  21. RFE/RL, Belarus, 2004. Reports Lukashenko’s comment on referendum result, RFE/RL Newsline, 18 October.Google Scholar
  22. RFE/RL, Hungary, 1994. Reports on failed attempt to hold referendum on mounting of 1996 World Fair Expo, RFE/RL Daily Report, 9, 21, 30 November.Google Scholar
  23. RFE/RL, Moldova, 2014. ‘Gagauzia voters reject closer EU ties for Moldova’, at http://www.rferl.org/content/moldova-gagauz-referendum-counting/25251251.html, accessed 7 February 2014.Google Scholar
  24. RFE/RL, Russia, 1994. Reports on projected referendum on restoration of Russian monarchy and Empire, RFE/RL Daily Report, 21 November, 6 December.Google Scholar
  25. RFE/RL, Ukraine, 1994. Report on official status of Russian language in eastern Ukraine following referendum, RFE/RL Daily Report, 3 November.Google Scholar
  26. Rose, Richard, Irina Boeva and Viacheslav Shironin, 1993. How the Russians are Coping With Transition: New Russian Barometer II. Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, SPP 216.Google Scholar
  27. Sheehy, Ann, 1990. ‘Fact sheet on declarations of sovereignty’, Radio Liberty Report on the USSR 2:45, pp. 23–5.Google Scholar
  28. Slater, Wendy, 1994. ‘Russia’s plebiscite on a new constitution’, RFE/RL Research Report 3:3, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  29. Tolz, Vera and Julia Wishnevsky, 1993. ‘Russia after the referendum’, RFE/RL Research Report 2:19, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  30. Vedomosti, 1987. Vedomosti Verkhovnogo soveta SSSR, 26, item 387.Google Scholar
  31. Vedomosti, 1991. Vedomosti s”ezda narodnykh deputatov SSSR i Verkhovnogo soveta SSSR, 1, item 10. Vedomosti RSFSR, 1990. Vedomosti Verkhovnogo soveta RSFSR, 27, item 230.Google Scholar
  32. Zakon, 2003. ‘Zakon Respubliki Tatarstan, “O referendume Respubliki Tatarstan”’, adopted 17 July 2003; available on the website Official Tatarstan’, at http://www.tatarstan.ru/eng, accessed 6 January 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ronald J. Hill and Stephen White 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald J. Hill
  • Stephen White

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations