Abstract
A crucial gap in sociology in recent decades has been the lack of a general theory of the state and power or of the state and social development.1 There are several reasons for this: one is the demise of Marxist political sociology with its unifying idea that the state is the instrument of class power. Marxist theory has been replaced, if at all, by Foucauldian or constructivist ideas on the one hand, or institutionalist theories on the other — neither of which have produced comparative-historical and systematic accounts of the variety among contemporary states. A second reason for this gap is the popular idea that the state’s powers have diminished in recent decades because of globalization and neoliberalism. On this view, the state’s powers are undermined by a globalizing economy, and if the state is eroding at the expense of larger economic forces, it becomes difficult to see the state as the locus of power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Ralph Schroeder
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schroeder, R. (2013). Paths towards Pluralist Democracy: Liberal versus Radical Interpretations. In: An Age of Limits. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314628_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314628_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-36061-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31462-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)