Skip to main content

The Family’s Role in Children’s Interpretation of Advertising

  • Chapter

Abstract

Family communication is often considered the most effective tool in the management of advertising influence on children. The family context not only influences how children use the media and the messages they get from them, but also how literate they become as media users. In this chapter, I discuss how parents manage their children’s interpretation of advertising. The chapter includes four sections. First, I discuss how parents engage in discussions with their children about advertising and more general consumer matters. Second, I discuss a typology of different communication strategies used by parents and caretakers. Third, there will be a discussion of the effectiveness of the various communication strategies and how that varies by different family and child characteristics. Finally, the chapter will address the implications of child-directed marketing in new media and its implications for future research and public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelman, R., & Pettey, G. R. (1989). Child attributes as determinants of parental television-viewing mediation: The role of child-giftedness. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., Blades, M., Oates, C., & Blumberg, F. (2009). Young children’s ability to recognize advertisements in web page designs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 71–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E. W. (2001). Effects of family communication on children’s interpretation of television. In J. Bryant & J. A. Bryant (Eds.), Television and the American family (2nd ed., pp. 377–396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E. W., Fujioka, Y., Bolls, P., & Engelbertson, J. (1999). How and why parents take on the tube. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, A., & Vitell, S. J. (2009). The ethics of food advertising targeted toward children: Parental viewpoint. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beentjes, J. W. J., Koolstra, C. M., Marseille, N., & Van der Voort, T. H. A. (2001). Children’s use of different media: For how long and why? In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 85–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M. (2007). Reducing children’s susceptibility to commercials: Mechanisms of factual and evaluative advertising interventions. Media Psychology, 9, 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M. (2009). The effectiveness of parental communication in modifying the relation between food advertising and children’s consumption behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 105–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., & Mens, C. (2007). Adult mediation of television advertising effects: A comparison of factual, evaluative, and combined strategies. Journal of Children and Media, 1, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., Rozendaal, E., Moorman, M., & Tanis, M. (2008). Parent versus child reports of parental advertising mediation: Exploring the meaning of agreement. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52, 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., Schuurman, J., & Bomhof, E. (2008). Associations between children’s television advertising exposure and their food consumption patterns: A household diary-survey study. Appetite, 50, 231–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2003). The effects of television advertising on materialism, parent-child conflict, and unhappiness: A review of research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2005). Parental mediation of undesired advertising effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49, 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2008). Observing purchase-related parent-child communication in retail environments: A developmental and socialization perspective. Human Communication Research, 34, 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Owen, L. H. (2010). Introducing the PCMC-Model: An investigative framework for young people’s processing of commercialized media content. Communication Theory, 20, 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, S. L. (2008). Children as consumers: Advertising and marketing. Future of Children, 18, 205–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L., & Grossbart, S. (1988). Parental style and consumer socialization of children. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L. (2005). The role of conscious awareness in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., & Avants, S. K. (1988). Children’s influence strategies: Structure, sex differences, and bilateral mother-child influence. Child Development, 59, 1303–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, K., Baranowski, T., Rittenberry, L., Cosart, C., Hebert, D., & de Moor, C. (2001). Child-reported family and peer influences on fruit, juice and vegetable consumption: Reliability and validity of measures. Health Education Research, 16, 187–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychology Bulletin, 127, 853–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, R. J., Hirsch, B., Singer, D., & Singer, J. (1987). Gender differences, mediation, and disciplinary styles in children’s responses to television. Sex Roles, 16, 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., Smith, P. K., Van Baaren, R. B., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2005). The unconscious consumer: Effects of environment on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R., Gleason, J. B., & McCabe, A. (1996). “Why don’t you talk to your mommy, honey?”: Parents’ and children’s talk about talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S., Wolf, A., & Warmouth, D. (1977). Parental concern about child-directed commercials. Journal of Communication, 27, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. O., & Birch, L. L. (1999). Restricting access to palatable foods affects children’s behavioral response, food selection, and intake. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69, 1264–1272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujioka, Y., & Austin, E. W. (2002). The relationship of family communication patterns to parental mediation styles. Communication Research, 29, 642–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujioka, Y., & Austin, E. W. (2003). The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B., & McAleer, J. (1997). Children and television (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B., Oates, C., & Blades, M. (2005). Advertising to children on TV: Content, impact, and regulation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R. E., & Eck, R. (1987). Advertising to children: Attitudes of business vs. consumers. Journal of Advertising Research, 27, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W. (1983). Avoiding conflict: Mothers as tacticians in the supermarket. Child Development, 54, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, S., Hudson, D., & Peloza, J. (2008). Meet the parents: A parent’s perspective on product placement in children’s films. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C. (1993). Pre-attentive mere exposure effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 376–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, D. R. (1999). Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B.-H., Pasadeos, Y., & Barban, A. (2001). On the deceptive effectiveness of labeled and unlabeled advertorial formats. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 50–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kremers, S. P. J., de Bruijn, G. J., Visscher, T. L. S., van Mechelen, W., de Vries, N., & Brug, J. (2006). Environmental influences on energy-balance-related behaviors: A dual process view. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3, 9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, D., Wilcox, B. L., Cantor, J., Palmer, E., Linn, S., & Dowrick, P. (2004). Report of the APA task force on advertising and children. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/releases/childrenads.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2006). Does advertising literacy mediate the effects of advertising on children? A critical examination of two linked research literatures in relation to obesity and food choice. Journal of Communication, 56, 560–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangleburg, T. F. (1990). Children’s influence in purchase decisions: A review and critique. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 813–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. C. (1997). Children’s understanding of the intent of advertising: A meta-analysis. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 16, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, J. M. E., Gootman, J. A. E., & Kraak, V. I. E. (2006). Food marketing to children and youth: Threat or opportunity? Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. M. (1986). Family communication patterns and political development: The child’s role. Communication Research, 13, 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, G. P. (1985). The role of family communication in consumer socialization of children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 898–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, A., & Fine, C. (2008). Who’s messing with my mind? The implications of dual-process models for the ethics of advertising to children. International Journal of Advertising, 27, 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. I. (2004). Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children’s responses to violent television. Journal of Communication, 54, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebenzahl, I. D., & Jaffe, E. D. (1998). Ethical dimensions of advertising executions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 805–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, L. H., Lewis, C., Auty, S., & Buijzen, M. (2013). Is children’s understanding of non-traditional advertising comparable to their understanding of television advertising? Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 32, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palan, K. M., & Wilkes, R. E. (1997). Adolescent-parent interaction in family decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, C., Levine, L., Loughlin, S., & Leslie, F. (2005). Impulsive and self-conscious: Adolescents’ vulnerability to advertising and promotion. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 24, 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2009). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. N., Saphir, M. N., Kraemer, H. C., Varady, A., & Haydel, K. (2001). Effects of reducing television viewing on children’s requests for toys: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22, 179–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozendaal, E., Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Do children’s cognitive defenses reduce their desire for advertised products? Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 34, 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozendaal, E., Buijzen, M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2010). Comparing children’s and adults’ cognitive advertising competences in the Netherlands. Journal of Children and Media, 4, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Cantor, J. (2001). The development of a child into a consumer. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation” and “social coviewing.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children’s media use: Gender differences and media displacement. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R., Gerke, P., & Kelly, M. A. (2002). Is there enough time on the clock? Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46, 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, N. D., & Larsen, V. (1993). Materialism and life satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 6, 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2007). The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies: Levels of placements, explicit and implicit memory, and brand choice behavior. Journal of Communication, 57, 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Moniek Buijzen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buijzen, M. (2014). The Family’s Role in Children’s Interpretation of Advertising. In: Blades, M., Oates, C., Blumberg, F., Gunter, B. (eds) Advertising to Children. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313256_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics