Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Rethinking Political Violence series ((RPV))

Abstract

In Namibia, the need for reintegration came as somewhat of a surprise. Ex-combatant protests jolted the government away from its assumption that reintegration would be spontaneous. In Mozambique, reintegration was on everyone’s mind. What changed in three years, from 1989 to 1992? In short: Angola. In Angola, UNITA denounced election results in the autumn of 1992 and led its rebel forces back to war against the government. Though not the cause of that country’s slide back into conflict, the failure to complete disarmament and demobilization prior to elections, coupled with the lack of any significant reintegration efforts, was widely perceived to have contributed to the re-mobilization of UNITA forces once the party’s leader decided to return to war.1 Policymakers in Mozambique, therefore, were operating in a context in which the failure of Angola loomed large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. UNSC (1992) ‘Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Angola Verification Mission II’, S/24245, 7 July, p.10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ajello and P. Whitmann (2004) ‘Mozambique’, in Malone (ed.), p.450. See also A. Meldrum (1993) ‘Avoiding Another Angola’, Africa Report, 38, September, pp.46–9; Southern Africa Report (1993) ‘War and Peace and War: Another Angola? Politics and Peace in Mozambique’, 9:1. I have argued that preoccupation with the Angolan scenario precluded a long-term approach to ex-combatant reintegration in Mozambique: J. McMullin (2004) ‘Reintegration of Combatants: Were the Right Lessons Learned in Mozambique?’ International Peacekeeping, 11:4, 625–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. UN (1995) The United Nations and Mozambique, UN Blue Book Series Vol. V (New York: United Nations Department of Public Information) pp.67, 69; Ajello and Whitman (2004), p.437.

    Google Scholar 

  4. UNDP (1997b) The Socio-Economic Reintegration of Demobilised Soldiers in Mozambique: The Soldiers’ View (Maputo: UNDP, October).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Newitt (1995) A History of Mozambique (London: Hurst & Company), p.564.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Schafer (2001) ‘Guerrillas and Violence in the War in Mozambique: De-Socialization or Re-Socialization?’ African Affairs, 100:399, 215–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Cahen (2005) ‘Success in Mozambique?’ in S. Chesterman, M. Ignatieff and R. Thakur (eds) Making States Work: State Failure and the Crisis of Governance (Tokyo: United Nations University Press), pp.219–20. RENAMO’s share of the vote has declined considerably since 2003, however.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Askin (1990) ‘Mission to RENAMO: The Militarization of the Religious Right’, Issue, 18:2, 30; A. Vines (1991) RENAMO: Terrorism in Mozambique (London: Centre for Southern African Studies, University of York, in association with James Currey); Newitt (1995), pp.570–1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Gersony (1988) ‘Summary of Mozambican Refugee Accounts of Principally Conflict-Related Experience in Mozambique’ (Washington, DC: US Department of State, April). See also C. R. Hume (1994) Ending Mozambique’s War: The Role of Mediation and Good Offices (Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace Press), p.14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Finnegan (1992) A Complicated War: The Harrowing of Mozambique (Berkeley: University of California Press), p.25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. M. Hill (2005) United Nations Disarmament Processes in Intra-State Conflict (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. P. Borges-Coelho and A. Vines (1994) ‘Pilot Study on Demobilization and Re-integration of Ex-Combatants in Mozambique’ (Oxford: Refugee Studies Programme), p.16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Rodolfo, with H. Sixpence and B. Mario (2005) ‘Mozambique: DDR Experience and Lessons Learned’, paper presented at the Conference on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration in Africa, Freetown, Sierra Leone, 21–23 June, p.9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ajello and Whitmann (2004), p.444; A. Ajello (1999) ‘Mozambique: Implementation of the 1992 Peace Agreement’, in C. Crocker, F. O. Hampson and P. R. Aall (eds) Herding Cats: Multi-Party Mediation in a Complex World (Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace Process), p.631.

    Google Scholar 

  16. IOM (2002) IOM Participation in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (Geneva: IOM, 25 January).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Alden (2002) ‘Making Old Soldiers Fade Away: Lessons from the Reintegration of Demobilized Soldiers in Mozambique’, Security Dialogue, 33:3, 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Chachiua (1999) ‘Demilitarisation of Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of Demobilisation of Youth in Mozambique’, paper presented at ‘The Role of Youth in Conflict Prevention in Southern Africa’ conference, Livingstone, Zambia, 11–14 April.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. B. Thompson (1999) ‘Beyond Civil Society: Child Soldiers as Citizens in Mozambique’, Review of African Political Economy, 26:80, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Gastrow and M. Mosse (2002) ‘Organised Crime, Corruption and Governance in the SADC Region’, paper presented at the Institute for Security Studies Regional Seminar, Pretoria, 18–19 April; US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2012) World Factbook 2012: Mozambique, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mz.html, accessed 1 July 2012; and UNODC (1999) The Drug Nexus in Africa (Vienna: UNODC, March), p.101 (fn.23).

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. B. Lundin, M. Chachiua, A. Gaspar, H. Guebuza and G. Mbilana (1999) ‘Reducing Costs through an Expensive Experience: The Impact of Demobilisation in Mozambique’, in Kingma (ed.); IOM (1996) After One Year: What is the Status of Reintegration in Mozambique? (Maputo: Information and Referral Service/Provincial Fund for Demobilized Soldiers, May).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. H. Levine (2007) ‘Organizational Disruption and Change in Mozambique’s Peace Process’, International Peacekeeping, 14:3, 368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Graduate Institute of International Studies (2001) Small Arms Survey 2001: Profiling the Problem (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p.64; Rodolfo et al. (2005), p.9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Hennop (2001) ‘Operations Rachel, 1995–2001’, Occasional Paper No.53, Institute for Security Studies, November.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Synge (1997) Mozambique: UN Peacekeeping in Action 1992–94 (Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace), p.112.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Newitt (1995), p.222; Nordstrom (1997); J. Hanlon (2010) ‘Mozambique: “The War Ended 17 Years Ago, But We Are Still Poor”’, Conflict, Security and Development, 10:1, 81; J. Hanlon (1996) Peace Without Profit: How the IMF Blocks Rebuilding in Mozambique (Oxford: James Currey), p.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. M. Weinstein (2002) ‘Mozambique: A Fading UN Success Story’, Journal of Democracy, 13:1, 141–56. Bøås and Hatløy (2008) reach the same conclusion about Liberia.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B. Slattery (2003) ‘Development without Equality: An Interview with Raul Domingos’, Journal of International Affairs, 57:1, 129–34; Author’s interview (2003) [M7].

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. Polgreen (2012) ‘As Coal Boosts Mozambique, the Rural Poor Are Left Behind’, New York Times, 10 November, http://nyti.ms/UB6qQe, accessed 10 November 2012; S. Willett (1995) ‘Ostriches, Wise Old Elephants and Economic Reconstruction in Mozambique’, International Peacekeeping, 2:1, 43; Slattery (2003). The refrain, ‘Democracy does not fill our stomachs’, is commonly heard: see J. Armon, D. Hendrickson and A. Vines (1998) ‘The Mozambican Peace Process in Perspective’, Accord, No.3, January, Preface.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. IMF (2007) ‘Republic of Mozambique: Fifth Review Under the Three-Year Arrangement Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility’ (Washington, DC: IMF), p.4, cited in Hanlon (2010), p.78.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. Reisinger (2009) ‘A Framework for the Analysis of Post-Conflict Situations: Liberia and Mozambique Reconsidered’, International Peacekeeping, 16:4, 490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., p.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Jaremey R. McMullin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McMullin, J.R. (2013). Mozambique: Cash for All. In: Ex-Combatants and the Post-Conflict State. Rethinking Political Violence series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312938_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics