Germany’s Special Path to Where? Elias in the Eurozone

  • Matt Clement


Norbert Elias was a witness to the twentieth century. His commitment to taking a long-term view of the process of societal change emerged from a long life (1897–1990), the formative years of which were forged in a nation that underwent rapid spurts of development in both positive and negative directions. Clearly, to have anything meaningful to say about these events, a long-term view was essential


European Central Bank Social Democracy Uneven Development Organize Capitalism Social Democratic Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, K. 2004. Weber: A Critical Introduction. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, W. 2003. Selected Writings Volume Four 1938–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  3. Blackbourn, R., and G. Eley. 1984. The Peculiarities of German History. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broue, P. 2006. The German Revolution. Chicago: Haymarket.Google Scholar
  5. Calder, A. 1969. The People’s War. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  6. Callinicos, A. 2007. “The Dream of Revolution and Reaction: Marxist History in the 20th Century.” In C. Wickham (ed.), Marxist History Writing in the 21st Century, 158–180. Oxford: OUP/British Academy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clement, M. 2009. “Praxical Sociology and the Algebra of Revolution.” Critique 37 (3): 415–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clement, M. 2013. “Manufacturing Austerity in the Eurozone.” Human Figurations 2 (1).Google Scholar
  9. Cliff, T. 1978. State Capitalism in Russia. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  10. Dewar, M. 1989. The Quiet Revolutionary. London: Bookmarks.Google Scholar
  11. Dunning, E., and J. Hughes. 2013. Norbert Elias and Modern Sociology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Elias, N. 1950. “Studies in the Genesis of the Naval Profession.” British Journal of Sociology 1 (4): 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elias, N. 1994. Refections on a Life. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Elias, N. 1996. The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. Elias, N. 2000. The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Elias, N. 2006. Early Writings. Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  17. Elias, N. 2012. What Is Sociology? Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fergusson, A. 2010. When Money Dies: The Nightmare of the Weimar Hyper-Inflation. London: Old Street.Google Scholar
  19. Fisk, R. 2006. The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  20. Fulford, M. 2008. “The Character and Limits of the Civilizing Process.” German Monitor (66): 1–16.Google Scholar
  21. Harman, C. 1988. The Fire last Time: 1968 and After. London: Bookmarks.Google Scholar
  22. Israel, J. 2003. Radical Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Israel, J. 2008. Enlightenment Contested. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Israel, J. 2010. A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual O rigins of Modern Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kilminster, R. 2007. Norbert Elias: Post-Philosophical Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Lapavistas, C. (ed.). 2012. Crisis in the Eurozone. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Lowy, M. 2005. Fire Alarm: Reading Walter Benjamin. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Marsh, D. 1996. Germany and Europe: The Crisis of Unity. London: Mandarin.Google Scholar
  29. Mennell, S. 2012. “What Economists Have Forgotten: A Figurational Perspective on the Crisis in Economics.” Paper presented at the Norbert Elias and Processual Sociology Conference, Copenhagen, April 2012.Google Scholar
  30. Merkel, A. 2012. BBC Newsnight Interview, March 26.Google Scholar
  31. Muller, J. 2012. “What Do Germans Think about When They Think about Europe?” London Review of Books, September 2.Google Scholar
  32. O’Toole, F. 2013. “Opinion.” The Irish Times, March 26.Google Scholar
  33. Overy, R. 2009. The Morbid Age: Britain between the Wars. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  34. Radice, H. 2011. “Cutting Government Deficits: Economic Science or Class War?” Capital & Class 35 (1): 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Runciman, D. 2012. “Will We Be All Right in the End?” London Review of Books, January 5.Google Scholar
  36. Spufford, P. 2006. Power & Profit: The Merchant in Medieval Europe. London: Tames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  37. Schorske, C. 1983. German Social Democracy 1905–1917. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  38. Schottker, D. 1998. “Norbert Elias and Walter Benjamin: An Exchange of Letters and Its Context.” History of the Human Sciences 11 (2): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Somner, T. 1973. “Germany’s Strategic Position in the European Power Balance.” In E. Feuchtwanger (ed.), Upheaval and Continuity: A Century of German History, 152–166. London: Oswald Wolf.Google Scholar
  40. Spiegel, P. 2011. “Debate Rages over Rescue System Funds.” Financial Times (London), September 21.Google Scholar
  41. Steiner, Z. 2007. The Lights Tat Failed: European International History 1919–33. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  42. Stern, F. 1999. Einstein’s German World. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  43. Weitz, E. 2007. Weimar Germany: Promise and Tragedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.Google Scholar
  44. Wyke, M. 2007. Caesar. London: Granta.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tatiana Savoia Landini and François Dépelteau 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Clement

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations