Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individualization and Social Dis/integration in Contemporary Society: A Comparative Note on Zygmunt Bauman and Norbert Elias

  • Chapter
Norbert Elias and Social Theory

Abstract

This chapter explores the approach to, and conceptualization of, individualization and socialization within the work of Zygmunt Bauman and Norbert Elias. We argue that, although both theorists place great emphasis on these powerful social processes, their respective positions differ markedly. We explore the theoretical differences and similarities in the two concepts of socialization and individualization set out by the two thinkers, before a discussion of how their contrasting approaches are manifested in the way that they deal with common concerns including social integration, distinction, and conflict. Both Bauman and Elias have produced a vast and diverse body of theoretical work that we cannot do justice to within the confines of this chapter. We therefore focus on the differences in terms of individualization as a long-term integrating force for Elias; and as a selective, discriminatory one for Bauman precipitating a decline in social solidarity and the potential for collective action, as well as sharper social inequalities driven by an uneven, individualized mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker, E. 1960. Social Contract. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baudrillard. J. 1998. The Consumer Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauman, Z. 1983. “Industrialism, Consumerism, and Power.” Theory, Culture, and Society 1 (3): 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauman, Z. 1990. Thinking Sociologically: An Introduction for Everyone. Cambridge: MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bauman, Z. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauman, Z. 1998a. Globalization. The Human Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bauman, Z. 1998b. Work, Consumerism, and the New Poor. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bauman, Z. 2001. The Individualized Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bauman, Z. 2005. Liquid Life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Taste of Judgement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burke, P. 2012. “Norbert Elias and the Social History of Knowledge.” Human Figurations 1 (1). Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0001.102.

  14. Cockayne, E. 2007. Hubbub: Filth, Noise, and Stench in England 1600–1710. London and New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davy, B. 2012. Land Policy: Planning and the Spatial Consequences of Poverty. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Déchaux, J. H. 1993. “N. Elias and P. Bourdieu: Analyse Conceptuelle Comparée.” Archives Européennes de Sociologie 32 (2): 364–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dunne, S. 2009. “The Politics of Figurational Sociology.” The Sociological Review 57 (1): 28–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elias, N. 1972. “Outline of a Plan for an International Journal in Sociology.” March 24. Document in Deutsches Literaturarchiv, Marbach am Neckar.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elias, N. 1987a. Involvement and Detachment. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elias, N. 1987b. “The Retreat of Sociologists into the Present.” Theory, Culture, and Society 4: 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elias, N. 1996. The Germans. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elias, N. 2000. The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elias, N. 2001. The Society of Individuals. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Featherstone, M. 1991. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fletcher, J. 1997. Violence and Civilization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Flint, J., and R. Powell. 2012. “The English City Riots of 2011, ‘Broken Britain’ and the Retreat into the Present.” Sociological Research Online 20 (3). Available online at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/3/20.html.

  27. Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goudsblom, J. 1989. “Stijlen en beschavingen” (Styles and Civilization). De Gids 152: 720–722.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Halevy, E. 1938. The Era of Tyrannies: Essays on Socialism and War. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hall, S. 1992. “The Question of Cultural Identity.” In Modernity and its Futures, edited by S. Hall, D. Held and T. McGrew. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-wealth Eccelesiaticall and Civil. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hume, D. 1740. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jones, O. 2011. Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Judt, T. 2010. Ill Fares the Land: A Treatise on Our Present Discontents. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kilminster, R. 1998. The Sociological Revolution: From the Enlightenment to the Global Age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kynaston, D. 2008. Austerity Britain, 1945–1951. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kynaston, D. 2010. Family Britain, 1951–1957. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Linklater, A. 2012. “Long-Term Patterns of Change in Human Interconnectedness: A View from International Relations.” Human Figurations 1 (1). Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0001.104.

  40. Liston, K. 2012. “Editor’s Introduction: Long-Term Perspectives on the Human Condition.” Human Figurations 1 (1). Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0001.101.

  41. Locke, J. 1698. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Maffesoli, M. 1996. The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mennell, S. 1989. Norbert Elias: Civilization and the Human Self-Image. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mennell, S. 1990. “Decivilizing Processes: Theoretical Significance and Some Lines of Research.” International Sociology 5 (2): 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Overy, R. 2010. The Morbid Age: Britain and the Crisis of Civilization. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Paulle, B., B. van Heerikhuizen, and M. Emirbayer. 2011. “Elias and Bourdieu.” In The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu, edited by S. Susen and B. Turner. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pinker, S. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence and Its Causes. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Powell, R., and J. Flint. 2009. “(In)formalization and the Civilizing Process: Applying the Work of Norbert Elias to Housing-Based Anti-Social Behaviour Interventions in the UK.” Housing, Theory, and Society 26 (3): 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pratt, J. 2005. “Elias, Punishment, and Civilization.” In The New Punitiveness, edited by J. Pratt, D. Brown, S. Hallsorth, M. Brown and W. Morrison. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Rodger, J. J. 2008. Criminalising Social Policy: Anti-Social Behaviour and Welfare in a De-civilised Society. Cullopmton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rousseau, J. J. 1762. Of the Social Contract or Principles of Political Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Savage, M. 2000. Class Analysis and Social Transformation. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Shaxson, N. 2011. Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men Who Stole the World. London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Shields, R. 1992. “The Individual, Consumption Cultures, and the Fate of Community.” In Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption, edited by R. Shields. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Slater, T. 2011. “From ‘Criminality’ to Marginality: Rioting Against a Broken State.” Human Geography 4 (3): 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Smith, D. 2001. Norbert Elias and Modern Social Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Toynbee, A. 1884. Toynbee’s Industrial Revolution. Newton Abbott: David and Charles.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wacquant, L. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wickham, G., and B. Evers. 2012. “Elias in the Footsteps of Hobbes?” Human Figurations 1 (1). Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.11217607.0001.106.

  62. Young, J. 2007. The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Young, M., and P. Wilmott. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zorbaugh, H. W. 1929. The Gold Coast and the Slum: A Sociological Study of Chicago’s Near North Side. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John Flint
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan Powell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Laurentian University, Canada

    François Dépelteau (associate professor of sociology) (associate professor of sociology)

  2. department of social sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil

    Tatiana Savoia Landini (associate professor) (associate professor)

Copyright information

© 2013 François Dépelteau and Tatiana Savoia Landini

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flint, J., Powell, R. (2013). Individualization and Social Dis/integration in Contemporary Society: A Comparative Note on Zygmunt Bauman and Norbert Elias. In: Dépelteau, F., Landini, T.S. (eds) Norbert Elias and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312112_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation