Abstract
The period between the late 1940s and the early 1970s represented the apogee of Fordism and a crucial moment of transition in the history of modernity. The term “Fordism” evokes images of fast-moving assembly lines, armies of robotized workers, and standardized products. Diego Rivera’s iconographic interpretation of this system at the Detroit Institute of Arts, based on his observation of Ford’s River Rouge plant, depicts a world of giant, intimidating machines and virile workers engaged in strenuous efforts. However, the consequences of Fordism extended well beyond the factory walls; it reshaped the spatial and demographic configuration of cities; it ignited bouts of economic development, industrial concentration, and social conflict. It finally collapsed, or, rather, was transformed, under the weight of economic changes and social protest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
William P. Hetrick and David M. Boje, “Organization and the Body: Post-Fordism Dimensions,” in John C. Wood and Michael C. Wood, eds., Henry Ford. Critical Evaluations in Business and Management (London: Routledge, 2002).
Daniel M. G. Raff and Lawrence H. Summers, “Did Henry Ford Pay Efficiency Wages?” Journal of Labor Economics 5, no. 4 (1987):57–86.
Carl H. A. Dassbach, “The Origins of Fordism: The Introduction of Mass Production and the Five-Dollar Wage.” Critical Sociology 18, no. 1 (Spring 1991): 77–90.
Stephen Meyer, “Adapting the Immigrant to the Line: Americanization in the Ford Factory, 1914–1921,” Journal of Social History 14, no. 1 (Autumn 1980): 67–82.
Clarence Hooker, “Ford’s Sociology Department and the Americanization Campaign and the Manufacture of Popular Culture Among Assembly Line Workers c. 1910–1917,” Journal of American Culture 20, no. 1 (Spring 1997): 47–53.
Antonio Gramsci, Selection from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (New York: International Publishers, 1971), 297.
Duccio Bigazzi, “Strutture della produzione: il Lingotto, l’America, l’Europa,” in Carlo Olmo, ed., Il Lingotto, 1915–1939. L’architettura, l’immagine, il lavoro (Torino: Umberto Allemandi, 1994), 281–336.
Carl Boggs, Gramsci’s Marxism (London: Pluto Press, 1976), 36–54;
Steve Jones, Antonio Gramsci (London: Routledge, 2006).
Paul Ransome, Antonio Gramsci: A New Introduction (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992), 132–150.
David A. Hounshell, From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984), 267.
David Gartman, Auto Opium: A Social History of American Automobile Design (London: Routledge, 1994);
Arthur J. Kuhn, GM Passes Ford, 1918–1938: Designing the General Motors Performance-Control System (University Park: Pennsylvania University Press, 1986).
Nils Kinch, “The Road from Dreams of Mass Production to Flexible Specialization: American Influences on the Development of the Swedish Automobile Industry,” in Haruhito Shiomi and Kazuo Wada, eds., Fordism Transformed. The Developments of Production Methods in the Automobile Industry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 107–138.
Steven Tolliday and Jonathan Zeitlin, Between Fordism and Flexibility. The Automobile Industry and Its Workers (Oxford: Berg, 1992).
Patrick Fridenson, “Fordism and Quality: The French Case, 1919–1932,” in Shiomi and Wada, Fordism Transformed, 160–183.
Wayne Lewchuk, “Fordism and the Moving Assembly Line: The British and American Experience, 1895–1930,” in Nelson Lichtenstein and Stephen Meyer, On the Line. Essays in the History of Auto Work (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1989).
Wayne Lewchuk, American Technology and the British Vehicle Industry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 152–184.
Mira Wilkins and Frank Ernest Hill, American Business Abroad. Ford on Six Continents (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1964).
Steven Tolliday, “Transplanting the American Model? US Automobile Companies and the Transfer of Technology and Management to Britain, France, and Germany, 1928–1962,” in Jonathan Zeitlin and Gary Herrigel, eds., Americanization and Its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 76–121.
Carol Geldermann, Henry Ford. The Wayward Capitalist (New York: Dial Press, 1981), 292.
Maurice Sugar, The Ford Hunger March (Berkeley, CA: Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute, 1980).
Beth Tompkins Bates, The Making of Black Detroit (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2012). 144–171.
Allan Nevins, Ford: Decline and Rebirth, 1933–1962 (New York: Scribner, 1962), 159–167;
Frank Marquart, An Auto Worker’s Journal: The UAW from Crusade to One-Party Union (College Parl, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press 1975);
Nelson Lichtenstein, “Life at Rouge: A Cycle of Workers’ Control,” in Charles Stephenson and Robert Asher, eds., Life and Labor: Dimensions of American Working-Class History (New York: SUNY Press, 1986), 237–259.
Nelson Lichtenstein, Labor’s War at Home. The CIO in World War II (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2003), 46.
Stanley Aronowitz, False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness (New York: McGraw Hill, 1973);
William Serrin, The Company and the Union: The “Civilized” Relationship of the General Motors Corporation and the United Automobile Workers (New York: Knopf, 1973);
Martin Glaberman, Wartime Strikes: The Struggle Against the No-Strike Pledge (Detroit: Bewick, 1980);
George Lipsitz, Rainbow at Midnight: Labor and Culture in the 1940s (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1981);
Christopher Tomlins, The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985);
Ronald Edsforth, Class Conflict and Cultural Consensus: The Making of Mass Consumer Society in Flint, Michigan (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987);
James B. Atleson, Labor and the Wartime State: Labor Relations and the Law during World War ii (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1998).
David Brody, “Workplace Contractualism in Comparative Perspective,” in Nelson Lichtenstein and Howell John Harris, eds., Industrial Democracy in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 176–205.
Jefferson Cowie, Capital Moves. RCA’s 70-Year Quest for Cheap Labor (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999).
James Gross, The Making of the National Labor Relations Board: A Study in Economics, Politics, and Law (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1974);
Howell Harris, “The Snares of Liberalism? Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Shaping of Federal Labour Relations Policy in the United States, ca. 1915–1947,” in Steven Tolliday, and Jonathan Zeitlin, eds., Shop Floor Bargaining and the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 148–91;
Ellis W. Hawley, “The Discovery and Study of a ‘Corporate Liberalism,’” Business History Review 52, no. 3 (Autumn 1978): 309–320
Patrick Renshaw, American Labor and Consensus Capitalism, 1935–1990 (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1991).
Eric Hobsbawn, The Age of Extremes (New York: Vintage, 1994).
Alan Brinkley, The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War (New York: Knopf, 1995).
UAW pamphlet Purchasing Power for Prosperity: The Case of the General Motors Workers for Maintaining Take-Home Pay (Detroit: International Union, UAW-CIO, GM Department, October 1945).
Kevin Boyle, The UAW and the Heyday of American Liberalism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995)
Liliana Lanzardo, Classe operaia e Partito Comunista alla Fiat. La strategia della collaborazione 1945–1949 (Torino: Einaudi, 1971).
Andrew Glyn, Alan Hughes, Alain Lipietz, and Ajit Singh, “The Rise and Fall of the Golden Age,” in Stephen A. Marglin and Juliet B. Schor, eds., The Golden Age of Capitalism. Reinterpreting the Postwar Experience (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 39–125.
Tony Judt, Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945 (London: William Heinemann, 2005), 72–77.
Tiziano Treu, “La contrattazione collettiva,” in Gian Primo Cella and Tiziano Treu, eds., Relazioni Industriali. Manuale per l’analisi della esperienza italiana (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1982), 165;
Charles Maier, “Preconditions for Corporatism,” in John H. Goldthorpe, ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), 39–59.
Max Koch, Roads to Post—Fordism: Labour Markets and Social Structures in Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).
Michel Aglietta, A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US experience (London: Verso, 1979).
Robert Boyer, “Technical change and the theory of ‘Regulation’”, Paris, CEPREMAP, papers no. 8707, 1987, 80–82.
Robert Brenner and Mark Glick, “The Regulation Approach: Theory and History,” New Left Review Series I, no. 188 (July-August 1991): 45–119.
Alan Lipietz, Mirages and Miracles. The Crisis of Global Fordism. (London: Verso, 1992), 23–45;
Robert Boyer and Yves Saillard, eds., Régulation Theory. The State of Art. (London: Routledge, 2002), 36.
Alan Lipietz, “Reflection on a Tale: the Marxist Foundations of the Concepts of Regulation and Accumulation,” Studies in Political Economy no. 26 (Summer 1988): 7–117;
Alan Lipietz, I shall not dwell here on the limits and critique to this theory. I refer to the reader to Robert Boyer, The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990);
Bob Jessop, “Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect,” Economy and Society, 19, no. 2 (1990): 153–216;
Adam Tickell and Jamie Peck, “Accumulation, Regulation and the Geographies of Post-Fordism; Missing Links in Regulationist Research,” Progress in Human Geography 16, no. 2 (1992): 190–218.
David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity (London: Blackwell, 1990), 121–189;
Giovanni Arrighi, The Long Twentieth Century. Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times (London: Verso, 1994).
Satoshi Ikeoa, “World Production,” in I. Wallerstein and T. Hopkins, eds., The Age of Transition: Trajectory of the World System, 1945–2025 (London: Pluto Press, 1996), 38–86.
Annemieke J. M. Roobeek, “The Crisis in Fordism and the Rise of a New Technological Paradigm,” Futures, 19, no. 2 (1987): 129–154.
Thomas Reifer and Jamie Sudler, “The Interstate System,” Futures, 19, no. 2 (1987): 16–20.
Thomas J. McCormick, America’s Half Century: United States Foreign Policy in the Cold War (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press 1989).
Stephen Marglin and Juliet Schor, eds., The Golden Age of Capitalism. Reinterpreting the Postwar Experience (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991);
Gabriel Kolko, “The Structure of Political Capitalism,” in Gabriel Kolko, Main Currents in Modern American History (New York: Harper & Row, 1976).
Andrew Glyn, “Productivity and the Crisis of Fordism,” International Review of Applied Economics, 4, no. 1 (1990): 42–44.
Andrew Sayer, “Postfordism in Question,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13, no. 4, 1989, 666–695;
Bob Jessop, “Fordism and Post-Fordism: A Critical Reformulation,” in Bob Jessop, Regulationist Perspectives on Fordism and Post-Fordism (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2001), 32–62.
Beverly Silver, Forces of Labor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Michael Rustin, “The Politics of Post-Fordism: Or, The Trouble with ‘New Times’,” New Left Review, I/175, (May-June 1989): 54–57.
M. J. Piore and C. Sabel, The Second Industrial Divide (New York: Basic Books, 1984);
Larry Hirschhorn, “The Post-Industrial Labor Process,” New Political Science 2 no. 3 (1981): 11–32.
Simon Clarke, “Overaccumulation, Class Struggle, and the Regulation Approach,” Capital and Class, 36 (Winter 1988): 59–92.
Werner Bonefeld, “Reformulation of State Theory,” Capital and Class 33 (1987): 96–127;
Stephen Clarke, “Overaccumulation, Class Struggle, and the Regulation Approach,” Capital and Class, 38 (1988): 59–92;
John Holloway, “The Great Bear, Post-Fordism and Class Struggle: A Comment of Bonefeld and Jessop,” Capital and Class, 36 (1988): 93–104;
Ferruccio Gambino, “Critica del Fordismo della scuola regolazionista,” in Eugenia Parise, ed., Stato Nazionale, lavoro e moneta (Napoli: Liguori, 1997), 215–240.
Antonio Negri’s Sergio Bologna (eds.) reading of Marx in “John M. Keynes e la teoria capitalista dello stato nel ’29,” in Operai e Stato: Lotte operaie e riforma dello stato capitalistico tra rivoluzione d’Ottobre e New Deal (Milano: Feltrinelli, 1972).
James R. O’Connor, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1973).
Copyright information
© 2013 Nicola Pizzolato
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pizzolato, N. (2013). The Making and Unmaking of Fordism. In: Challenging Global Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311702_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311702_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45705-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31170-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)