Abstract
As founder of St Petersburg, Peter I consciously, and arguably also subconsciously, attempted to control both the city’s space and its inhabitants, in pursuit of certain goals. These goals were in part related to his wider reform agenda — that of transforming Russia into a stronger entity, domestically and internationally — but were also emblematic of a desire to use the city as a testing ground for certain specific ventures. Whilst St Petersburg began life as a fortified port on the Baltic coast, considerable efforts were made by Peter I and his successors to provide it with the appearance, institutions and activities of something much more in keeping with a royal residence or a capital city. The cities that Peter himself visited during the Grand Embassy of 1697–8 provided a natural starting point for some of the inspirations for his new project. This list of cities includes both large capitals and some of the smaller, but significant cities in central Europe: Riga, Mitau, Königsberg, Amsterdam (specifically Zaandam), London, Leipzig, Dresden, Prague, Vienna and Rawa. These cities provided a range of experiences and examples that would prove important, to varying degrees, in Peter’s planning. Whether as international ports, commercial centres, seats of learning or sites of courtly culture, they provided a tangible flavour of the possibilities available to the young Tsar.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For one such view, see Friedrich Christian Weber, The Present State of Russia (London, 1968), vol. 1, p. 190. More critical views are discussed in Maria di Salvo, ‘A Venice of the North? Italian Views of St Petersburg’, in Anthony Cross (ed.), St Petersburg, 1703–1825 (Basingstoke, 2004), pp. 71–9.
Lindsey Hughes, ‘Western European Graphic Material as a Source for Moscow Baroque Architecture’, SEER, 55/4 (1977), pp. 433–43.
Sir Francis Dashwood, ‘Sir Francis Dashwood’s Diary of his Visit to St Petersburg in 1733’, ed. Betty Kemp, SEER, 38 (1959), pp. 202 and 206.
Robert E. Jones, ‘Getting the Goods to St. Petersburg: Water Transport from the Interior, 1703–1811’, SR, vol. 43 (1984), pp. 413–17.
Svetlana R. Dolgova, ‘“... ekhat’ i perepisat’ imianno bez medleniia”: Pervye zhiteli Peterburga. 1717 g.’, Istoricheskii arkhiv, 2 (2003), pp. 7–20.
Johann G. Georgi, Opisanie rossiisko-imperatorskogo stolichnogo goroda Sankt Peterburga i dostopamiatnostei v okrestnostiakh onogo (St Petersburg, 1794), vol. 1, p. 168.
Simon Dixon, ‘30 July 1752: the Opening of the Peter the Great Canal’, in Anthony Cross (ed.), Days from the Reigns of Eighteenth-Century Russian Rulers (Cambridge, 2007), vol. 1, pp. 93–108.
Grigorii Kaganov, ‘“As in the Ship of Peter”’, SR, 50 (1991), pp. 762–4.
Max Vasmer, Etimologicheskii slovar’ russkogo iazyka, ed. Boris A. Larin, transl. Oleg N. Trubachev (Moscow, 1986), vol. 2, p. 429.
Viktor I. Buganov, ‘Ekaterina I’, Voprosy istorii, 11 (1994), p. 48.
Richard Wortman, Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy (Princeton, NJ, 1995), vol. 1, p. 70.
See, for example, the views of: Petr P. Pekarskii, Istoriia Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk v Peterburge (St Petersburg, 1870), vol. 1, pp. xvii–xxxi
Alexander Vucinich, Science in Russian Culture (London, 1965), vol. 1, pp. 65–74.
Michael Gordin, ‘The Importance of Being Earnest: the Early St Petersburg Academy of Sciences’, Isis, 91 (2000), pp. 15–16.
On the successes and failures of these two subsidiary bodies, see Ludmilla Schulze, ‘The Russification of the St Petersburg Academy of Sciences and Arts in the Eighteenth Century’, British Journal for the History of Science, 18 (1985), pp. 310–11.
Details of his election can be found in: John Appleby, ‘James Spilman, F.R.S. (1680–1763), and Anglo-Russian Commerce’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 48 (1994), pp. 17–29.
Petr P. Pekarskii, Nauka i literatura v Rossii pri Petre Velikom (St Petersburg, 1862), vol. 1, pp. 46–58.
Anthony Anemone, ‘The Monsters of Peter the Great: the Culture of the St Petersburg Kunstkamera in the Eighteenth Century’, Slavic and East European Journal, 44 (2000), p. 586.
See, for example, Aubry de la Mottraye, Travels through Europe, Asia, and into part of Africa... (London, 1732), vol. 3, pp. 174–6174-6; Peder von Haven, ‘Puteshestvie v Rossiiu’, in Bespiatykh (ed.), Peterburg Anny Ioannovny, p. 356; Dashwood, ‘Diary’, p. 205; Berch, ‘Putevye zametki’, pp. 1
‘Reliatsiia o zakliuchenii mira so Shvetsii... 30 October 1721’, in Nikolai A. Voskresenskii, Zakonodatel’nye akty Petra I (Moscow-Leningrad, 1945), vol. 1, pp. 157–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Paul Keenan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Keenan, P. (2013). Location: Situating the City. In: St Petersburg and the Russian Court, 1703–1761. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311603_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311603_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45697-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31160-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)