Abstract
There has been an enduring fascination with St Petersburg in the course of the three centuries since its foundation in 1703 and, at first glance, it is not difficult to understand why this should be the case. It is a relatively recent city, founded only at the beginning of the eighteenth century, and yet it rapidly grew to become the famed capital city of one of Europe’s Great Powers. Several aspects of this process help to explain the continuing allure of St Petersburg. It has often been described as Russia’s ‘window’ into Europe, a phrase first coined by Francesco Algarotti who visited St Petersburg in the 1730s and one that neatly encapsulates the situation of the city, geographically and culturally.1 The mythology associated with the creation and development of St Petersburg has also attracted considerable interest over the intervening centuries.2 One popular example is the myth of the city’s foundation, which presents Peter creating his new city in a wilderness and has featured in numerous literary treatments of St Petersburg. This image conveniently overlooks two considerations: that Peter may not have been present on this momentous occasion in May 1703 and that the proposed site contained a Swedish fortress, known as ‘Nienschants’, as well as a number of small settlements, principally the town of Nien.3 Instead, this topos has its origins in the work of successive eighteenth-century writers, beginning during the reign of Peter himself, that celebrated the achievement of the city’s founder and it subsequently gained widespread currency through its inclusion in Aleksandr S. Pushkin’s famous Bronze Horseman.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Francesco Algarotti, Letters from Count Algarotti to Lord Hervey and the Marquis Scipio Maffei…. (London, 1769), vol. 1, p. 70.
Lev V. Pumpianskii, ‘Mednyi vsadnik i poeticheskaia traditsiia XVIII veka’, Pushkin: Vremennik Pushkinskoi komissii, 4–5 (1939), pp. 94–100.
Michael Florinsky, Russia: a History and an Interpretation (London, 1953), vol. 1, p. 432. au12._Examples that remain relevant contributions on the period include: Alexander Lipski, ‘A Re-Examination of the “Dark Era” of Anna Ioannovna’, American Slavic and East European Review, 15 (1956), pp. 477–88 and Evgenii V. Anisimov, Rossiia v seredine XVIII veka: bor’ba za nasledie Petra (Moscow, 1986), published in English as Empress Elizabeth: Her Reign and Her Russia, 1741–1761, transl. John Alexander (Gulf Breeze, FL, 1995).
Peter Burke, ‘Did Europe Exist before 1700?’, History of European Ideas, 1 (1980), pp. 1–29.
Samuel Baron, ‘The Origins of Seventeenth-Century Moscow’s Nemeckaja Sloboda’, California Slavic Studies, 5 (1970), pp. 1–17.
W. H. Parker, ‘Europe: How Far?’, The Geographical Journal, 126/3 (1960), pp. 278–86.
Mark Bassin, ‘Russia between Europe and Asia: the Ideological Construction of Geographical Space’, SR, 50/1 (1991), pp. 6–7.
Paul Bushkovitch, ‘Cultural Change among the Russian Boyars, 1650–1680: New Sources and Old Problems’, Forschungen zur osteuropaischen Geschichte, 56 (2000), pp. 92–94.
For an excellent overview of some leading contributions, see Ernest Zitser, ‘New Histories of the Late Muscovite and Early Imperial Russian Court’, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 6/2 (2005), pp. 375–92.
See, for example, John Alexander, ‘Petersburg and Moscow in Early Urban Policy’, Journal of Urban History, 8/2 (1982), pp. 146–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Paul Keenan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Keenan, P. (2013). Introduction. In: St Petersburg and the Russian Court, 1703–1761. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311603_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311603_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45697-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31160-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)