Skip to main content
  • 673 Accesses

Abstract

In January 2010, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake devastated Haiti. A little research informs us that around 300,000 people died and more than a million were left homeless. Emergency workers from around the globe raced to help the suffering nation. Two years later, in 2012, Oxfam reported that over 500,000 people were still in displaced persons camps, half of the rubble from the quake was yet to be cleared, cholera had claimed thousands of lives, and 45 per cent of the population still faced food insecurity.1 Michaëlle Jean, the UNESCO Special Envoy for Haiti, explained to the world:

[W]hat killed them was not an earthquake. What killed them was negligence; extensive, even murderous negligence. The absence of laws and regulations to standardize construction works, for want of a provident government willing to use its authority to enforce standards, this is what made nearly 300,000 people dead. … A few weeks only after the tragedy in Haiti, an earthquake 500 times more powerful hit Chile … The comparative body count says it all: 486 dead.

The example of Peru, another country of high seismic hazard, is just as eloquent: existing solutions that are realistic and achievable, basic engineering regulations that aren’t more expensive, national laws and policies being enforced, a population mobilized, educated, forewarned and empowered …2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. Morgan and L. Smircich, ‘The Case for Qualitative Research’, Academy of Management Review, 5:4, pp. 491–500, October 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.G. Guba and Y.S. Lincoln, ‘Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage: 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. A. Heifetz, A. Grashow, and M. Linsky, The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools and Tactics for Changing Your Organization and the World, Harvard Business Press: 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.S. Jun, The Social Construction of Public Administration, State University of New York Press: 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Elhawary and G. Castillo, ‘The Role of the Affected State: A Case Study on the Peruvian Earthquake Response’, Overseas Development Institute, HPG Working Paper, April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Jim Armstrong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armstrong, J. (2013). Positivism and Constructivism. In: Improving International Capacity Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310118_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics