Abstract
John Cruickshank noted that Albert Camus “always convinces us more when speaking as a moralist than when speaking as a logician.”1 Indeed, the combination of emotional persuasiveness and logical perplexity in Camus’s philosophical work presents contemporary readers with something of a roadblock. Attracted by the tenor and timbre of Camus’s message, many scholars have either ignored or mistaken serious philosophical problems at its core. This article argues that contemporary readers should interpret Camus’s central concept, absurdity, in its appropriate context: as a metaphor for psychological resistance to traumatic loss and deprivation. In what follows, I describe the nature and aim of such resistance and demonstrate that the absurd rebellion Camus depicts in his major works entails an obfuscation of understanding and a sacrifice of the ability to make loss meaningful. Approaching Camus’s absurd philosophy in this way, however, does not diminish the significance of his endeavor. On the contrary, the analytical tack pursued here suggests that Camus’s thought contributes substantially to our understanding of grieving processes on both cultural and individual levels, while offering us an interpretive key to the broader tradition of absurd philosophy, literature, and drama.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Cruickshank, Albert Camus and the Literature of Revolt (New York: Oxford University Press, 1960), 64.
Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays, trans. Justin O’Brien (New York: Vintage Books, 1955), 30.
The word absurd derives from the Latin absurdus, which means “out of harmony,” or what is unharmonious to the ear (see Martin Esslin, The Theatre of the Absurd, 3rd ed. [New York: Vintage Books, 2001], 23),
but its likely root is not surd, meaning “deaf,” but svar, meaning “tune” or “sound” (see Charles Halsey, An Etymology of Latin and Greek [Boston: Ginn, Heath, 1882], 151).
Lyle Campbell, Historical Linguistics: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), 116.
Here, the term object refers to other subjects, persons, and internal representations of persons with whom one may relate: “People react to and interact with not only an actual other but also an internal other, a psychic representation of a person which in itself has the power to influence both the individual’s affective states and his overt behavioral reactions” (Jay Greenberg and Stephen Mitchell, Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory [Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983], 10).
For Freud, objects of loss can even include abstractions, symbols, and ideals (see Sigmund Freud, “Mourning and Melancholia,” in On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement: Papers on Metapsychology, and Other Works, trans. and ed. James Strachey, Standard Edition, 243–58, vol. 14 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud [London: Hogarth, 1957], 243).
Primo Levi, Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity, trans. Stuart Woolf (New York: Touchstone Books, 1996), 29.
See Matthew Bowker, Albert Camus and the Political Philosophy of the Absurd (PhD diss., University of Maryland, 2008);
Matthew Bowker, “The Meaning of Absurd Protest: The Book of Job, Albert Camus, and C. Fred Alford’s After the Holocaust,” Journal of Psycho Social Studies 4, no. 2 (2001): 1–21;
and Matthew Bowker, “Albert Camus’s Critical Reception: From Celebration to Controversy” in Critical Insights on Albert Camus, ed. S. G. Kellman (Hackensack, NJ: Salem Press, 2011).
Fred Willhoite Jr., Beyond Nihilism: Albert Camus’s Contribution to Political Thought (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1968), 6.
Albert Camus, The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt, trans. Anthony Bower (New York: Vintage Books, 1956), 9–10.
Jean Paul Sartre, “An Explication of The Stranger” in Camus: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Germaine Brée (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1962), 110.
Albert Camus, Caligula and Three Other Plays, trans. Stuart Gilbert. (1938; repr., New York: Vintage Books, 1958), 15.
Claude Lanzmann, “The Obscenity of Understanding: An Evening with Claude Lanzmann,” in Trauma: Explorations in Memory, ed. Cathy Caruth (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), 204.
Henri Bergson, Le rire: Essai sur la signification du comique (Paris: Quadrige, Presses Universitaires de France, 1940), 142.
Dylan Thomas, The Collected Poems of Dylan Thomas: 1934–1952, ed. Daniel Jones (New York: New Directions, 1971), 112, lines 13, 24.
Julia Kristeva, Black Sun: Depression and Melancholia, trans. Leon S. Roudiez, European Perspectives Series (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989).
Elder Olson, The Poetry of Dylan Thomas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954), 23.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Emmanuelle Anne Vanborre
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bowker, M.H. (2012). Sisyphean (Out)rage and the refusal to Mourn. In: Vanborre, E.A. (eds) The Originality and Complexity of Albert Camus’s Writings. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309471_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309471_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44669-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30947-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)