Skip to main content
  • 327 Accesses

Abstract

How do international organizations respond when they have admitted countries that do not believe in the values of the organization? What can those organizations do when the contrarian member governments are even working to undermine and break the organizations, and the organizations lack ready tools of compliance, punishment or incentivization? With those questions asked, the post-Cold War enlargement of NATO and the EU — which have both received libraries of scholarly attention — retrospectively seems astonishingly easy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Fraser Cameron, An Introduction to European Foreign Policy (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds) The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rick Fawn (ed.) Globalising the Regional, Regionalising the Global (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruce Russett, “Bushwhacking the Democratic Peace”, International Studies Perspectives (Vol. 6, No. 4, November 2005), p. 402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Sonia Cardenas, “Norm Collision: Explaining the Effects of International Human Rights Pressure on State Behavior”, International Studies Review (Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2004), pp. 213–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarah E. Mendelson, “Russians’ Rights Imperiled: Has Anybody Noticed?”, International Security (Vol. 26, No. 4, 2002), p. 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. For example, Beth A. Simmons, Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edward C. Luck, “Gaps, Commitments, and the Compliance Challenge”, in Edward C. Luck and Michael W. Doyle (eds) International Law and Organization: Closing the Compliance Gap (Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce Russett and John Oneal, Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jon C. Pevehouse, Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Stephen F. Cohen, Failed Crusade: America and the Tragedy of Post Communist Russia (Updated Edition) (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. David S. Fogelsong, The American Mission and the ‘Evil Empire’: The Crusade for a ‘Free Russia’ since 1881 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, International Organization (Vol. 52, No. 4, Autumn 1998), p. 915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeffrey T. Checkel, “Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe”, International Studies Quarterly (Vol. 43, No. 1, March 1999), pp. 83–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dennis J.D. Sandole, Peace and Security in the Postmodern World: The OSCE and Conflict Resolution (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), p. xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emanuel Adler, “Seeds of Peaceful Change: The OSCE’s Security Community-Building Model”, in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (eds) Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 119–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way, “Linkage versus Leverage: Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change”, Comparative Politics (Vol. 38, No. 4, July 2006), esp. p. 387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiona Hill and Clifford G. Gaddy, “Putin and the Uses of History”, The National Interest (January-February 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Forced to be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paul Cornish, The Arms Trade and Europe (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frank Schimmelfennig, “The EU: Promoting Liberal-Democracy through Membership Conditionality”, in Trine Flockhart (ed.) Socializing Democratic Norms: The Role of International Organizations for the Construction of Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robin Guthrie, “Europe? — What Europe? — The Future”, in John Coleman (ed.) The Conscience of Europe (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1999), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Walter Kemp (ed.) Quiet Diplomacy in Action: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities (The Hague: Brill, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jutta Joachim, Bob Reinalda and Bertjan Verbeek, “International Organizations and Implementation: Pieces of the Puzzle”, in Jutta Joachim, Bob Reinalda and Bertjan Verbeek (eds) International Organizations and Implementation: Enforcers, Managers, Authorities? (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Rick Fawn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fawn, R. (2013). International Organizations and Internal Conditionality. In: International Organizations and Internal Conditionality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137305497_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics