Advertisement

Political Pluralism in the Media

  • Sandra B. Hrvatin
  • Brankica Petković
Part of the Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business book series (GMPB)

Abstract

The study of media pluralism indicators presented in this book has sought to develop a methodology for the effective analysis of several domains, including political pluralism in the media (KU Leuven — ICRI et al., ‘EU MPM Study’ 2009). In this chapter we will first place the notions of political and media pluralism in their broader theoretical and historical context. The underlying premise is that political pluralism, including in the media sector, cannot be successfully considered or assessed in isolation. It is a product of the dominant power relations and the economic system in which it occurs, and is therefore influenced by a number of interacting social and economic factors. To be able to monitor it, we must first understand the underpinning structures and then develop the methodology that will take into account the workings of the underlying factors rather than concentrate on its results.

Keywords

Risk Indicator Political Affiliation Creative Industry Investigative Reporting Underlying Premise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansell, C.K. (2011) Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benkler, Y. (2001) ‘Of Sirens and Amish Children: Autonomy, Information and Law’, New York University Law Review, 76(23).Google Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y. (2011) The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs over Self- Interest (New York: Crown Business).Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1979) ‘Public Opinion Does Not Exist’, in A. Mattelart and S. Siegelaub (eds) Communication and Class Struggle (New York: International General).Google Scholar
  5. European Parliament and Council (2010) Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audiovisual Media Services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (codified version), Official Journal of the European Union of 15.4.2010, L 95/1.Google Scholar
  6. Garnham, N. (2005) ‘From Cultural to Creative Industries: An Analysis of the Implications of the ‘Creative Industries’ Approach to Arts and Media Policy Making in the United Kingdom’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karppinen, K. (2009) ‘Rethinking Media Pluralism and Communicative Abundance’, Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 11, 151–169.Google Scholar
  8. Kranzberg, M. (1986) ‘Technology and History: Kranzberg’s Laws’, Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. KU Leuven — ICRI, Jönköping International Business School — MMTC, Central European University — CMCS, Ernst & Young Consultancy Belgium (2009) Independent Study on Indicators for Media Pluralism in the Member States — Towards a Risk- Based Approach (Final Report and Annexes: User Guide, MPM, Country Reports, prepared for the European Commission) (Brussels: European Commission), http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/independent-study-indicators-media-pluralism. (‘EU MPM Study’).Google Scholar
  10. Laclau, E. (1993) ‘Univerzalizem, partikularizem in vprašanje identitete’ (prevedeno po E. Laclau, ‘Universalism, Particularism and the Question of Identity’, October, 61, 83–90) v Filozofija skozi psihoanalizo VII. Analecta. Razprave, 1–2, Problemi, 4–5, 385–395.Google Scholar
  11. Lanier, J. (2010) You are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
  12. Mansell, R. (2012) Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation and Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  13. McChesney, R.W. (2005) Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media (New York: The New Press).Google Scholar
  14. McChesney, R.W. (2013) Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning Internet Against Democracy (New York: The New Press).Google Scholar
  15. Nussbaum, M.C. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Pariser, E. (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You (New York: The Penguin Press).Google Scholar
  17. Roszak, T. (1986) The Cult of Information: The Folklore of Computers and the True Art of Thinking (Cambridge: Lutterworth Press).Google Scholar
  18. Sen, A. (2000) Development as Freedom (New York: Anchor Books).Google Scholar
  19. Shirky, C. (2008) Here Comes Everybody: How Change Happens When People Come Together (New York: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
  20. Shirky, C. (2011) ‘Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable’, in R.W. McChesney and V. Pickard (eds) Will the Last Reporter Please Turn Out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done to Fix It (New York: The New Press).Google Scholar
  21. UNESCO (1980) Many Voices One World: Towards a New Just and More Efficient World Information and Communication Order, MacBride Report, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0004/000400/040066eb.pdf.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, E.O. (1999) Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (New York: Vintage Books).Google Scholar
  23. Wu, T. (2011) The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires (New York: First Vintage Books Edition).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sandra B. Hrvatin and Brankica Petković 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra B. Hrvatin
  • Brankica Petković

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations