Advertisement

Pluralism of Media Types and Media Genres

  • Mihály Gálik
  • Artemon Vogl
Part of the Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business book series (GMPB)

Abstract

Societies have different media systems, and a pluralism of media types and media genres clearly differ among them. The term ‘media system’ (or ‘media scene’) used in communication literature generally ‘refers to the actual set of mass media in a given national society’ (McQuail 2000, p. 192). Media systems or media scenes, if one prefers the latter term, are products of social history and the continuous development of media technologies, including their adaptations to existing media. The dimensions that differentiate media systems are numerous, and, for instance, McQuail’s short summary of them consists of scale, degree of politicization and public regulation, diversity and sources of finance (2000, p. 210). The framework, used by Hallin and Mancini (2004) to compare media systems puts the emphasis on four dimensions, namely on the development of media markets, political parallelism, journalistic professionalism, and the degree and nature of state intervention in the media system.

Keywords

Social Networking Site Media Type Leading Service Digital Literacy Television Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atlatszo (2011) Átlátszó Center for Investigative Journalism — About Us, http://atlatszo.hu/2011/07/01/about-us/
  2. Bradshaw, P. (2011) ‘Has Investigative Journalism Found its Feet Online?’, Online Journalism Blog, http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2011/08/23/has-investigative-journalism-found-its-feet-online-part-1/.Google Scholar
  3. Council EU (1999) Resolution of the Council of the European Union and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, Meeting within the Council of 25 January 1999 Concerning Public Service Broadcasting, C 30/1, Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  4. Council of Europe (2003) Recommendation Rec (2003) 9 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on Measures to promote the democratic and social contribution of digital broadcasting, https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=38043&Site=CM
  5. Council of Europe (2007) Recommendation CM/Rec (2007) 3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the remit of public service media in the information society, https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1089759
  6. Deuze, M. (2003) ‘The Web and its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online’, New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domingo, D. and Heinonen, A. (2008) ‘Weblogs and Journalism — A Typology to Explore the Blurring Boundaries’, Nordicom Review, 29(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2009) Communication from the European Commission on the Application of State Aid Rules to Public Service Broadcasting, Official Journal of the European Union, C 257, 1–14, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52009XC1027%2801%29&from=EN
  9. Goodman, E.P. (2007) ‘Proactive Media Policy in the Age of Content Abundance’, in P.M. Napoli (ed.) Media Diversity and Localism: Meaning and Metrics (Mahwah, NJ and London Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 363–382.Google Scholar
  10. Hallin, D.C. and Mancini, P. (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010) ‘Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media’, Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. KU Leuven — ICRI, Jönköping International Business School — MMTC, Central European University — CMCS, Ernst & Young Consultancy Belgium (2009) Independent Study on Indicators for Media Pluralism in the Member States — Towards a Risk- Based Approach (Final Report and Annexes: User Guide, MPM, Country Reports, prepared for the European Commission) (Brussels: European Commission), http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/independent-study-indicators-media-pluralism (‘EU MPM Study’).Google Scholar
  13. McQuail, D. (2000) Mass Communication Theory (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  14. Meek, C. (2005) ‘Commitment, Not Cash, is Key to Investigative Journalism’, Journalism.co.uk, http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/commitment-not-cash-is-key-to-investigative-journalism/s2/a51542/.Google Scholar
  15. Nissen, C.S. (2006) ‘Public Service Media in the Information Society’, Report Prepared for the Council of Europe’s Group of Specialists on Public Service Broadcasting in the Information Society, http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/media/doc/H-Inf(2006)003_en.pdf.Google Scholar
  16. Noam, E.M. (1996) ‘Media Regulation — New Rules for New Times’, Media Studies Journal, 2–3(10), 39–47.Google Scholar
  17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007) Participative Web: User-Created Content, Working Party on the Information Economy, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/14/38393115.pdf.Google Scholar
  18. Owen, B.M. (2005) Confusing Success with Access: ‘Correctly’ Measuring Concentration of Ownership and Control in Mass Media and Online Services (Washington, DC: The Progress and Freedom Foundation), http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/pop12.11owen.pdf.Google Scholar
  19. Wardle, C. and Williams, A. (2008) ugc@thebbc — Understanding the Impact Upon Contributors, Non Contributors and BBC News (Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mihály Gálik and Artemon Vogl 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihály Gálik
  • Artemon Vogl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations