New Media Ecology: Reconceptualizing Media Pluralism

  • Karol Jakubowicz
Part of the Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business book series (GMPB)


Brown and Duguid (2000) note that the rise of the information age has brought about a good deal of ‘endism’. New technology, they say, is predicted to bring about, among other things, the end of the press, television and mass media; politics; government; and the nation- state. Napoli (2009) stops short of foretelling an Armageddon, but says that converging media technologies, the globalisation of distribution networks, and unprecedented fragmentation and interactivity dramatically affect established theories, analytical approaches and policy priorities. Does this extend to media pluralism concerns, as well?


Public Sphere Media Content Content Provider Deliberative Democracy World Economic Forum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ARTICLE 19 (2006) Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: Training Manual for African Regulators (London: ARTICLE 19, the Global Campaign for Free Expression).Google Scholar
  2. Aslama, M. (2009) Participation as Position and Practice: Rethinking Media Diversity and Policy in the Web 2.0 Era, Working Paper (Bronx, NY: Donald McGannon Communication Research Center, Fordham University), and%20practice.pdf [accessed 4 October 2011].Google Scholar
  3. Aslama, M. and Napoli, P.M. (2010) Diversity 2.0: Rethinking Audiences, Participation, and Policies, Working Paper (Bronx, NY: Fordham University), [accessed 26 October 2011].Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2000) ‘The Social Life of Information: Chapter One: Limits to Information’, First Monday, 5(4), [accessed 4 October 2011].Google Scholar
  5. Carpentier, N. (2011) Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological- democratic Structure (Bristol: Intellect).Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, M. (2010) ‘Visions of Media Pluralism and Freedom of Expression in EU Information Society Policies’, in B. Klimkiewicz (ed.) Media Freedom and Pluralism: Media Policy Challenges in the Enlarged Europe (Budapest: Central European University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Dahlgren, P. (1996) ‘Media Logic in Cyberspace: Repositioning Journalism and Its Publics’, Javnost/The Public, 3(3), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlgren, P. (2005) ‘The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation’, Political Communication, 22, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Downey, J. and Fenton, N. (2003) ‘New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere’, New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doyle, G. (1997) ‘From ‘Pluralism’ to ‘Ownership’: Europe’s Emergent Policy on Media Concentrations Navigates the Doldrums’, Journal of Information, Law and Technology, 3,[accessed 2 October 2011].Google Scholar
  11. Doyle, G. (2002) Media Ownership: The Economics and Politics of Convergence and Concentration in the UK and European Media (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  12. EAO (2011) ‘DTT Update: As the 2012 Deadline Approaches….’, Press Release (Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory).Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (1992) Green Paper on Pluralism and Media Concentration in the Internal Market. An Assessment of the Need for Community Action, COM (92) 480 (Brussels: European Union).Google Scholar
  14. European Commission (2007) European Commission Staff Working Document on Media Pluralism in the Member States of the European Union, SEC (2007) 32 (Brussels: European Union).Google Scholar
  15. European Commission (2011) European Commission: Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011–2012, COM (2011) 666 final (Brussels: European Union).Google Scholar
  16. European Parliament (2010), Resolution of 25 November 2010 on public service broadcasting in the digital era: the future of the dual system, 2010/2028(INI).Google Scholar
  17. Foster, R. (2007) ‘Future Broadcasting Regulation’. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport, [accessed 29 October 2011].Google Scholar
  18. Franquet, R., Villa, M.I. and Bergillos, I. (2011) ‘Audience Participation in Online News Websites: A Comparative Analysis’, Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 5(3), 223–242.Google Scholar
  19. Gardam, T. and Levy, D. (eds) (2008) The Price of Plurality: Choice, Diversity and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford).Google Scholar
  20. Gibbons, T. (2004) ‘Protection of Media Pluralism and National Regulation of Media Concentration’, Paper at conference on ‘Promotion of Media Pluralism — European Experiences and Polish Expectations’, held by the National Broadcasting Council, Warsaw, 9 December.Google Scholar
  21. Gillmor, D. (2004) ‘We the Media, Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People’, [accessed 29 October 2011].Google Scholar
  22. Gonzalez, J.J., Rodriguez, R. and Castromil, A.R. (2010) ‘A Case of Polarized Pluralism in a Mediterranean Country: The Media and Politics in Spain’, Global Media Journal Mediterranean Edition, 5(1/2), 1–9, [accessed 1 November 2011].Google Scholar
  23. Hallin, D.C. and Mancini, P. (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helberger, N. (2011) ‘Media Diversity from the User’s Perspective: An Introduction’, Journal of Information Policy, 1, 241–245, [accessed 29 October 2011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Helberger, N., Leurdijk, A. and de Munck, S. (2010) ‘User Generated Diversity: Some Reflections on How to Improve the Quality of Amateur Productions’, Communications & Strategies, 77, 55–77.Google Scholar
  26. Hitchens, L. (2011) ‘Media Regulatory Frameworks in the Age of Broadband: Securing Diversity’, Journal of Information Policy, 1, 217–240, [accessed 28 October 2011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffmann- Riem, W. (1987) ‘National Identity and Cultural Values: Broadcasting Safeguard’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holt, K. and Karlsson, M. (2011) ‘Edited Participation: Comparing Editorial Influence on Traditional and Participatory Online Newspapers in Sweden’, Javnost/The Public, 18(2), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hunt, J. (2011) ‘Boldness be My Friend’: Speech by Secretary of State to the Royal Television Society,[accessed 22 October 2011].Google Scholar
  30. Jakubowicz, K. (1993) ‘Stuck in a Groove: Why the 60s Approach to Communication Democratization Will No Longer Do’, in S. Splichal and J. Wasko (eds) Communication and Democracy (Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp).Google Scholar
  31. Jakubowicz, K. (1994) ‘Legislative Guarantees of a Plurality of Information Sources’ in European Commission for Democracy through Law (ed) Implementation of Constitutional Provisions Regarding Mass Media in a Pluralist Society: Collection Science and Technique of Democracy, No. 13, pp. 80–93 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe).Google Scholar
  32. Jakubowicz, K. (2005) ‘Let the People Speak? The (Unfinished) Evolution of Communicative Democracy’, in B. Ociepka (ed.) Populism and Media Democracy (Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego).Google Scholar
  33. Jakubowicz, K. (2010) ‘Television A.C.? Change and Continuity in Television’, Quaderns del CAC 34, XIII(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  34. Jakubowicz, K. (2013) ‘Do We Know a Medium When We See One? New Media Ecology’, in M.E. Price and S. Verhulst (eds) Routledge Handbook of Media Law: A Socio-Legal Investigation (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  35. Jauert, P. (2008) ‘From Broadcasting to Podcasting — The Digitalization and Differentiation of Radio’, presentation delivered during the RIPE@2008 Conference, Mainz.Google Scholar
  36. Karppinen, K. (2006) ‘Media Diversity and the Politics of Criteria: Diversity Assessment and Technocratisation of European Media Policy’, Nordicom Review, 27(2), 53–68.Google Scholar
  37. Karppinen, K. (2010) Rethinking Media Pluralism: A Critique of Theories and Policy Discourses (Helsinki: Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki).Google Scholar
  38. Kenix, L.J. (2009) ‘Blogs as Alternative’, Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 14, 790–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klimkiewicz, B. (2010) ‘Introduction: Structural Media Pluralism’, International Journal of Communication, 4, 906– 913, [accessed 1 October 2011].Google Scholar
  40. Klimkiewicz, B. (2011) ‘The Clash and Resonance: Media Pluralism in European Regulatory Policies’, in M. Sükösd and K. Jakubowicz (eds) Media, Nationalism and European Identities (Budapest: Central European University Press).Google Scholar
  41. KU Leuven — ICRI, Jönköping International Business School — MMTC, Central European University — CMCS, Ernst & Young Consultancy Belgium (2009) Independent Study on Indicators for Media Pluralism in the Member States — Towards a Risk- Based Approach (Final Report and Annexes: User Guide, MPM, Country Reports, prepared for the European Commission) (Brussels: European Commission), pluralism (‘EU MPM Study’).Google Scholar
  42. La Porte Alf Aro, M.T. and Sábada, T. (2001) Globalisation of the Media Industry and Possible Threats to Cultural Diversity, Working Document for the STOA Panel, PE 296.704/Fin. St. (Brussels: Directorate General for Research, European Parliament).Google Scholar
  43. Le Borgne-Bachschmidt, F. et al. (2008) ‘User-created content: supporting a participative information society’ (Final report for the European Commission by IDATE, TNO and IViR — SMART 2007/2008), Scholar
  44. Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I. and Kelly, K. (2003) New Media: A Critical Introduction (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  45. McQuail, D. (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  46. McQuail, D. (2005) Mass Communication Theory (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  47. Morris, M. and Ogan, C. (1996) ‘The Internet as Mass Medium’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(4),[accessed 28 October 2011].Google Scholar
  48. Napoli, P.M. (2009) Navigating Producer-Consumer Convergence: Media Policy Priorities in the Era of User-Generated and User-Distributed Content, Working Paper (Bronx, NY: Donald McGannon Communication Research Center, Fordham University).Google Scholar
  49. Napoli, P.M. (2011a) ‘Exposure Diversity Reconsidered’, Journal of Information Policy, 1, 246–259, [accessed 25 October 2011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Napoli, P.M. (2011b) ‘Diminished, Enduring, and Emergent Diversity Policy Concerns in an Evolving Media Environment’, International Journal of Communication, 5, 1182–1196, [accessed 4 October 2011].Google Scholar
  51. Noam, E. (2003) ‘The Internet: Still Wide Open and Competitive?’, [accessed 31 October 2011].Google Scholar
  52. Ofcom (2011) Invitation to Comment on Measuring Plurality Across Media (London: Office of Communications).Google Scholar
  53. Parmar, S. (2011) New Media Fostering Pluralism (London: ARTICLE 19), [accessed 30 September 2011].Google Scholar
  54. Picard, R. (2009) ‘Impact of Recent Technological and Economic Trends on Policies for Media Pluralism’, Independent Study on Indicators for Media Pluralism in the Member States — Towards a Risk- Based Approach. Stakeholder Workshop, Brussels.Google Scholar
  55. Reese, S., Rutigliano, L., Hyun, K. and Jeong, J. (2007) ‘Mapping the blogosphere: Professional and citizen-based media in the global news arena’, Journalism, 8(3), 235–261, DOI: 10.1177/1464884907076459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosen, C. (2005) ‘The Age of Egocasting’, The New Atlantis, 7, 51–72, [accessed 28 October 2011].Google Scholar
  57. Rosenstiel, T. (2011) ‘Five Myths About the Future of Journalism’, The Washington Post, [accessed 27 October 2011].Google Scholar
  58. Sengupta, S. and Sisario, B. (2011) ‘Facebook as Tastemaker’, International Herald Tribune, [accessed 29 October 2011].Google Scholar
  59. Stross, R. (2010) ‘YouTube Wants You to Sit and Stay Awhile’, The New York Times, [accessed 29 October 2011].Google Scholar
  60. Sunstein, C. (2001) ‘The Daily We: Is the Internet Really a Blessing for Democracy?’, Boston Review, [accessed 28 October 2011].Google Scholar
  61. Valcke, P., Hou, L., Stevens, D. and Kosta, E. (2008) ‘Guardian Knight or Hands Off: The European Response to Network Neutrality: Legal Considerations on the Electronic Communications Reform’, Communications & Strategies, 72, 89–112.Google Scholar
  62. Valcke, P. (2011) ‘Looking for the User in Media Pluralism Regulation: The Potential and Limits of Regulating Exposure Diversity’, Journal of Information Policy, 1, 287–320, [accessed 29 October 2011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van Cuilenburg, J. (2007) ‘Media Diversity, Competition and Concentration: Concepts and Theories’ in E. De Bens, C. Hamelink, K. Jakubowicz, K. Nordenstreng, J. Van Cuilenburg and R. Van der Wurff (eds) Media Between Culture and Commerce (Bristol: Intellect Books).Google Scholar
  64. Van Eijk, N. (2011) ‘Net Neutrality and Audiovisual Services’, IRIS Plus, 5, 7–19.Google Scholar
  65. Van Passel, E., Raats, T. and Mostmans, L. (2011) ‘Virtual Utopia versus Digital Reality: The Limitations of Cultural Content in an Online Environment’, in J. Bauwens and G. Nulens (eds) Under Construction: Culture in a Network Society (Brussels: Vrije Universiteit).Google Scholar
  66. Venice Commission (2005) ‘Opinion on the Compatibility of the Laws ‘Gasparri’ and ‘Frattini’ of Italy with the Council of Europe Standards in the Field of Freedom of Expression and Pluralism of the Media’, CDL-AD (2005) 017 (Strasbourg: European Commission For Democracy Through Law).Google Scholar
  67. World Economic Forum, INSEAD, comScore and Oxford Internet Institute (2011) The New Internet World: A Global Perspective on Freedom of Expression, Privacy, Trust and Security Online (Geneva: World Economic Forum).Google Scholar
  68. Wu, S., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A. and Wats, D.J. (2011) ‘Who Says What to Whom on Twitter’, International World Wide Web Conference Committee, [accessed 27 October 2011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wunsch-Vincent, S. and Vickery, G. (2007) ‘Participative Web: User-Created Content’ (Report prepared for the OECD Working Party on the Information Economy), DSTI/ICCP/IE(2006)7/FINAL, April 2007, Scholar

Copyright information

© Karol Jakubowicz 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karol Jakubowicz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations