Gender Mainstreaming in Mercosur and Mercosur-EU Trade Relations

  • Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann
Part of the Gender and Politics Series book series (GAP)


This chapter analyses to what extent and how gender has been addressed by Mercosur and in EU-Mercosur interregional relations in order to contribute to the discussion on the relevance of the (inter) regional level in the dynamics of norm diffusion and norm travelling in a multilevel process of governance, addressed in this book. Given the EU’s commitment to gender, and its self-promotion as a normative power (see Chapter 3), one would expect that the EU exports gender norms to Mercosur in their biregional relations. This chapter, however, argues that the EU only plays a marginal role in the promotion of gender equality in Mercosur. Instead, the mobilization of regional women’s movements and changes in government orientation in Mercosur member states since 2003 are more relevant factors. Gender is not prominent in EU foreign policy and development policy towards Mercosur. The process of trade liberalization, one of the central objectives of their interregional relations, is even assessed as having a potential negative impact on gender, and the EU-Mercosur trade policy has not been gender-mainstreamed. First, the chapter analyses the process of institutionalization of gender in Mercosur, assessing the role played by domestic and international actors. Next, it explores how gender has been addressed in EU development policies towards Mercosur.


Civil Society Free Trade Gender Equality Trade Liberalization Gender Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allaert, B. and P. Brambilla (2001), International Trade and Gender Inequality: A Gender Analysis of the Trade Agreements between the European Union and Latin America: Mexico and Mercosur, Brussels: Women in Development Europe (WIDE), Grupo de Educación Popular con Mujeres (GEM), CISCSA.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, S. E. (2009), ‘Beyond NGO-ization? Reflections from Latin America’, Development, 52: 2, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angulo, G. and C. Freres (2006), ‘Gender Equality and EU Development Policy towards Latin America’, in M. R. Lister and M. Carbone (eds), New Pathways in International Development: Gender and Civil Society in EU Policy, Aldershot: Ashgate, 45–58.Google Scholar
  4. Briceño-Ruiz, J. (2010), ‘From the South American Free Trade Area to the Union of South American Nations: The Transformations of a Rising Regional Process’, Latin American Policy, 1: 2, 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camara dos Deputados (2012), ‘Dilma recebe prêmio e diz que igualdade de gênero é prioridade do governo’. Online: (accessed 18 June 2013).Google Scholar
  6. Carbone, M. (2008), ‘Mission Impossible: The European Union and Policy Coherence for Development’, Journal of European Integration, 30: 3, 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castañeda, J. G. (2006), ‘Latin America’s Left Turn’, Foreign Affairs, 85: 3, 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Council of the European Union (2013), ‘EU-CELAC Action Plan 2013–2015’. Online: EN/foraff/135043.pdf (accessed 31 January 2013).Google Scholar
  9. Debusscher, P. (2012), ‘Gender Mainstreaming in European Union Development Policy toward Latin America: Transforming Gender Relations or Confirming Hierarchies?’, Latin American Perspectives, 39: 6, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Nucci, L. A. (2008), ‘Hacia una Sociología de Género: Análisis FODA para Estimar la Visión Integradora de los Impactos de Género en el Mercosur’, Monografía FLACSO.Google Scholar
  11. Duina, F. (2006), The Social Construction of Free Trade: The European Union, NAFTA and Mercosur, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Espino, A. (2008), ‘Impacting Mercosur’s Gender Policies: Experiences, Lessons Learned and Ongoing Work of Civil Society in Latin America’, Paper presented at the Montreal International Forum 2008.Google Scholar
  13. Espino, A. and I. van Staveren (2002), Instruments for Gender Equality in Trade Agreements: European Union, Mercosur, Mexico, Brussels: WIDE.Google Scholar
  14. EEAS (2012), ‘Final Conclusions’. Online: (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
  15. European Commission (2002), ‘Mercosur-European Community: Regional Strategy Paper 2002–2006’. Online: (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
  16. —— (2007), ‘Mercosur Regional Strategy Paper 2007–2013’, (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
  17. —— (2010a), ‘Mid-term Review and Regional Indicative Programme for 2011–2013’, Online: (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
  18. —— (2010b), ‘Position Paper: Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) of the Association Agreement under Negotiation between the European Union and Mercosur’, July, Online: (accessed 18 June 2013).Google Scholar
  19. Fawcett, L. and A. Hurrell (eds) (1995), Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, E. J. (2009), ‘Re(gion)alizing Women’s Human Rights in Latin America’, Politics & Gender, 5: 3, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grugel, J. B. (2004), ‘New Regionalism and Modes of Governance — Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America’, European Journal of International Relations, 10: 4, 603–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hinojosa, L. (2008), ‘EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement: Potential Impacts on Rural Livelihoods and Gender’, Brooks World Poverty Institute: Working Paper 81.Google Scholar
  23. Jelin, E., T. Valdés and L. Bareiro (1998), ‘Gender and Nationhood in Mercosur: Notes for Approaching the Object’, UNESCO/MOST Discussion Paper No. 24: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  24. MercoPress (2012), ‘Mercosur Faces “Great Problems and Internal Divisions” Making Talks with EU “Difficult”’, Online: (accessed 18 June 2013).Google Scholar
  25. Mercosur homepage, ‘Quines somos?’, Online: (accessed 18 June 2013).
  26. Mercosur Secretariat (2000), ‘Resolutions Adopted in 2000’, Online: (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
  27. —— (2012), ‘CMC Decisión 14/12’, Online: CGestDoc%5Cpubweb.nsf/D10F19B5E591DB2F83257BA1004E4EC2/$File/DEC_014–2012_ES_Lineamientos%201gualdad%20Genero.pdf (accessed 30 January 2013).Google Scholar
  28. — (several years), ‘REM and RMAAM Meeting Protocols’, Online: (accessed 30 January 2013).
  29. Oelsner, A. (2012), ‘The Institutional Identity of Regional Organizations, or Mercosur’s Identity Crisis’, International Studies Quarterly, 57: 1, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orsino, S. (2009), ‘Los Procesos de Institucionalización de los Mecanismos Regionales para la Equidad de Género: Reunión Especializada de la Mujer del Mercosur (REM)’, Online: (accessed 18 June 2013)Google Scholar
  31. Ratton Sanchez, M. (2007), ‘Is There Any Room for Input and Control Legitimacy by Civil Society in Mercosur?’, in A. Ribeiro Hoffmann and A. van der Vleuten (eds), Closing or Widening the Gap? Legitimacy and Democracy in Regional Integration Organizations, Aldershot: Ashgate, 117–134.Google Scholar
  32. Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2004), Foreign Policy of the European Union towards Latin American Southern Cone States (1980–2000): Has It Become More Cooperative? Cases of Foreign Direct Investment and Agricultural Trade, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  33. — (2010), ‘Between Power Politics and Utopia: A Brazilian Perspective on European International Role’, in H. Brunkhorst and G. Grözinger (eds), The Study of Europe, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 35–49.Google Scholar
  34. — (forthcoming), ‘Human Rights in Mercosur: Last But Not Least’, in T. Börzel and V. van Hüllen (eds), Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. and M. Herz (2010), ‘Regional Governance in Latin America: Institutions and Normative Discourses in the Post-Cold War Period,’ in A. Guedes and A. Faria (eds), International Management and International Relations: A Critical Perspective from Latin America, New York: Routledge, 61–76.Google Scholar
  36. Rodriguez, G. S. (2006), ‘Negociaciones UE/Mercosur: Consolidando Antiguas Desigualdades’, Online: (accessed 18 June 2013).Google Scholar
  37. Roett, R. (ed.) (1999), Mercosur: Regional Integration, World Markets, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  38. Secretaria de Politicas para as Mulheres (2011), Política Nacional de Enfrentamento à Violência Contra as Mulheres, Brasília: SPM/PR, Online: (accessed 18 June 2013).Google Scholar
  39. UNDP (2012), ‘Gender Inequality Index’, Online: (accessed 30 November 2012).Google Scholar
  40. Valdez T. (2003), ‘El Mercosur y el movimiento de mujeres: ¿un espacio para la ampliación de ciudadanía?’, in E. Jelin (ed.), Más allá de la nación: las escalas múltiples de los movimientos sociales, Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal.Google Scholar
  41. Van der Vleuten, A. and A. Ribeiro Hoffmann (2010), ‘Explaining the Enforcement of Democracy by Regional Organizations: Comparing EU, Mercosur and SADC’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48: 3, 737–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Staveren, I. (2003), ‘Monitoring Gender Impacts of Trade’, European Journal of Development Research, 15: 1, 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vigevani, T. (1998), Mercosul: Impactos para Trabalhadores e Sindicatos, São Paulo: Editora LTr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations