Gender Equality Norm Diffusion and Actor Constellations: A First Exploration

  • Anouka van Eerdewijk
  • Conny Roggeband
Part of the Gender and Politics Series book series (GAP)

Abstract

This book investigates the diffusion of two gender equality norms. It traces how norms concerning gender-based violence travel between the global and the regional level as well as within regions with regard to the EU, South America and Southern Africa. It also investigates the dynamics concerning gender mainstreaming in development aid and trade negotiations at the interregional level, focusing on the relations between the EU, on the one hand, and SADC and Mercosur, on the other. In this chapter, we unravel the dynamics of norm diffusion, the actors that are involved in diffusion processes and the role of framing in constructing, negotiating, contesting and changing norms. We will first scrutinize the notion of norms, after which we will look at the dynamics of norm diffusion. The empirical chapters of the book investigate the different pathways and mechanisms through which norms emerge, travel and change. In order to grasp what is at stake in these empirical cases, we introduce a framework in this chapter that unpacks the actor constellations of norm diffusion as well as the framing processes involved.

Keywords

Social Movement Gender Equality International Norm Female Genital Mutilation Norm Diffusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, K. W. and D. Snidal (2000), ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, International Organization, 54: 3, 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2004), ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, International Organization, 58: 2, 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez, S. E. (1999), ‘Advocating Feminism: The Latin American Feminist NGO “Boom”’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1: 2, 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez, S. E., Friedman, E. J., & Beckman, E. Maylei Blackwell, N. Stoltz Chinchilla, N. Lebon, M. Navarro, and M. Ríos Tobar (2002), ‘Encountering Latin American and Caribbean Feminisms’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28: 1, 537–579.Google Scholar
  5. Anheier, H., M. Glasius and M. Kaldor (2001), ‘Introduction to Global Civil Society’, in M. Kaldor, M. Glasius and H. Anheier (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–22.Google Scholar
  6. Bacchi, C. (2005), ‘Discourse, Discourse Everywhere: Subject “Agency” in Feminist Discourse Methodology’, Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 13: 3, 198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banaszak, L. A. (2010), The Women’s Movement: Inside and Outside the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, M. N. and R. Duvall (2005), Power in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Batliwala, S. (2002), ‘Grassroots Movements as Transnational Actors: Implications for Global Civil Society’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13: 4, 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benford, R. D. and D. A. Snow (2000), ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 1, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bleijenbergh, I. and C. Roggeband (2007), ‘Equality Machineries Matter: The Impact of Women’s Political Pressure on European Social-Care Policies’, Social Politics, 14: 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cerny, P. (2001), ‘From “Iron Triangles” to “Golden Pentangles”? Globalizing the Policy Process’, Global Governance, 7: 4, 397–410.Google Scholar
  13. Eyben, R. (2010), ‘Subversively Accommodating: Feminist Bureaucrats and Gender Mainstreaming’, IDS Bulletin, 41: 2, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferree, M. M. and A. M. Tripp (eds) (2006), Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink (1998), ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52: 4, 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —— (2001), ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review Political Science, 4: 1, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman, E. J. (2009), ‘Re(gion)alizing Women’s Human Rights in Latin America’, Politics & Gender, 5: 3, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holli, A. M. (2008), ‘Feminist Triangles: A Conceptual Analysis’, Representation, 44: 2, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kantola, J. and J. Squires (2012), ‘From State Feminism to Market Feminism’, International Political Science Review, 30: 4, 382–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keck, M. E. and K. Sikkink (1998), Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Klotz, A. (1995), ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and US Sanctions against South Africa’, International Organization, 49: 451–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krasner, S. D. (1983), ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in S. D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
  23. Kriszan, A. and E. Lombardo (2012), ‘The Quality of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive Approach’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20: 1, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krook, M. L. and J. True (2012), ‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality’, European Journal of International Relations, 18: 1, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Locher, B. and E. Prügl (2009), ‘Gender and European Integration’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181–197.Google Scholar
  26. Lombardo, E. and P. Meier (2006), ‘Gender Mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a Feminist Reading?’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13: 2, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lombardo, E., P. Meier and M. Verloo (eds) (2009), The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policymaking, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Lowi, T. J. (1969), The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Marsh, J. C. and D. Sharman (2009), ‘Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer’, Policy Studies, 30: 3, 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazur, A. (2002), Theorizing Feminist Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McAdam, D., J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald (1996), ‘Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes — Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements’, in D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald (eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mercer, C. (2002), ‘NGOs, Civil Society and Democratization: A Critical Review of the Literature’, Progress in Development Studies, 2: 1, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merry, S. E. (2006), Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Meyer, W., J. Boli, G. M. Thomas and F. O. Ramirez (1997), ‘World Society and the Nation-State’, American Journal of Sociology, 103: 1, 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moghadam, V. M. (2005), Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Montoya, C. (2009), ‘International Initiative and Domestic Reforms: European Union Efforts to Combat Violence against Women’, Politics & Gender, 5: 3, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Müller, H. (2002), ‘Security Cooperation’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, 369–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rees, T. (2005), ‘Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7: 4, 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Risse, T., S. Ropp and K. Sikkink (eds) (1999), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Roggeband, C. (2010), ‘Double Triangles: How the Transnationalization of Gender Politics Affects Feminist Cooperative Constellations’, Paper presented at the Gender Equality in EU Interregional Relations Panel at the 51st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA) in New Orleans, 17–20 February.Google Scholar
  41. Schmidt, V. A. (2008), ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 1, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stone, D. (1989), ‘Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas’, Political Science Quarterly, 104: 2, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tarrow, S. (2005), The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tripp, A. M. (2006), ‘The Evolution of Transnational Feminisms: Consensus, Conflict, and New Dynamics’, in M. M. Ferree and A. M. Tripp (eds) (2006), Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights, New York: New York University Press, 51–78.Google Scholar
  45. Vargas, V. and S. Wieringa (1998), ‘The Triangle of Empowerment: Processes and Actors in the Making of Public Policy for Women’, in G. Lycklama à Nijeholt, V. Vargas and S. Wieringa, (eds), Women’s Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, New York: Garland Publishing, 3–23.Google Scholar
  46. Veneklasen, L. and A. Khan (2012), ‘Women’s Movement and Economic Power: Connecting the Local and the Global’, Gender and Development, 20: 3, 352–357.Google Scholar
  47. Verloo, M. (2005), ‘Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality’, Social Politics, 12: 3, 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verloo, M. and E. Lombardo (2007), ‘Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach’, in M. Verloo (ed.), Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, Budapest: Central European University Press, 21–46.Google Scholar
  49. Walby, S. (2009), Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. —— (2011), The Future of Feminism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wiener, A. (2009), ‘Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 35: 1, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiener, A. and U. Puetter (2009), ‘The Quality of Norms is What Actors Make of It: Critical Constructivist Research on Norms’, Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5: 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
  53. Woodward, A. (2003), ‘Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and Informal Governance’, in T. Christiansen and S. Piattoni (eds), Informal Governance in the European Union, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 76–93.Google Scholar
  54. Zippel, K. S. (2006), The Politics of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative Study of the United States, the European Union, and Germany, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zwingel, S. (2005), ‘From Intergovernmental Negotiations to (Sub)national Change: A Transnational Perspective on the Impact of CEDAW’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7: 3, 400–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. —— (2012), ‘How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective’, International Studies Quarterly, 56: 1, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Anouka van Eerdewijk and Conny Roggeband 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anouka van Eerdewijk
  • Conny Roggeband

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations