Skip to main content
  • 125 Accesses

Abstract

Greek and Turkish nationalism have more commonalities that one might think. Their treatment of the question of religion is a milestone in the nation-building process. It highlights how two states can depart with a lag of virtually one-hundred years, from secularist beginnings and come to point eventually to strike a compromise with religion. In that compromise religion provides crucial symbolic resources and social cohesion, while nationalism instrumentalizes religion and removes its universalistic aspects to serve national interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a recent comparative study of Greek and Turkish nationalisms, see Umut Özkırımlı and Spyros A. Sofos, Tormented by History: Nationalism in Greece and Turkey (London: Hurst and Co., 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Renee Hirschon, “Dismantling the Millet: Religion and National Identity in Contemporary Greece” in Ayhan Aktar, Umut Özkırımlı, and Niyazi Kızılyürek, eds., Nationalism in the Troubled Triangle: Greece, Turkey, Cyprus (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gokhan Cetinsaya, “Rethinking Nationalism and Islam: Some Preliminary Notes on the Roots of ‘Turkish-Islamic Synthesis’ in Modern Turkish Political Thought,” The Muslim World, Vol. 89, no. 3–4 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anthony D. Smith, “The ‘Sacred’ Dimension of Nationalism,” Millennium— Journal of International Studies, Vol. 29, no. 3 (2000), p. 794. Also see

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elie Kedourie, Nationalism, Fourth ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994),

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony D. Smith, Chosen Peoples (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, “The ‘Sacred’ Dimension of Nationalism,” p. 13. Also see Elie Kedourie, Nationalism in Asia and Africa (New York: Meridian, 1970), pp. 1–152, Smith, Chosen Peoples, pp. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers Brubaker, “Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 18, no. 1 (2012), pp. 3–4, Smith, Chosen Peoples, pp. 4–5, 15, 26, 40–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., pp. 11–12, H. G. Haupt and D. Langewiesche, eds., Nation und Religion in Europa (Frankfurt: Campus, 2004), p. 12 ff, I.M. Lapidus, “Between Universalism and Particularism: The Historical Bases of Muslim Communal, National and Global Identities,” Global Networks: a Journal of Transnational Affairs, Vol. 1, no. 1 (2001),

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Schulze Wessel, ed., Nationalisierung der Religion und Sakralisierung der Nation im Östlichen Europa (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 2006), pp. 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Ioannis N. Grigoriadis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grigoriadis, I.N. (2013). Introduction. In: Instilling Religion in Greek and Turkish Nationalism: A “Sacred Synthesis”. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137301208_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics