Psychological and Biological Roots of Open-Mindedness

  • John Lambie


In this chapter, we shall look at the psychological and biological underpinnings of the state of critical open-mindedness. When we think about what the state of critical open-mindedness entails — being able to rationally shift between different perspectives — there are several well-known psychological functions which immediately spring to mind as being necessary for this to occur. The initial list would include working memory, theory of mind, and logical reasoning. We should also add awareness of our own fallibility and a willingness to revise our theories (reflective corrigibility). Working memory is the ability to hold multiple pieces of information in mind and to manipulate them. Theory of mind refers to the understanding of mental states and being able to attribute mental states to others in order to explain and predict their behaviour. These processes are obviously dependent in part on our brains, so part of the story of what underpins critical open-mindedness is the evolution of brains capable of supporting these cognitive functions that in turn support critical open-mindedness.


Executive Function Executive Functioning Pretend Play Social Intelligence False Belief Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 14.
    Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F., Maughan, A., Toth, S.L., and Bruce, J. (2003). False belief understanding in maltreated children. Development and Psychpathology, 15, 1067–1091.Google Scholar
  2. 17.
    Lambie, J.A. and Lindberg, A. (2013). The role of parental emotional validation in children’s emotional awareness. Submitted.Google Scholar
  3. 23.
    Stanovich (2009). What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rationality.Google Scholar
  4. 24.
    Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A.M., and Fischoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 25.
    Ritchhart and Perkins (2005). Learning to think: The challenges of teaching thinking.Google Scholar
  6. 28.
    Erikson, E. (1958). Young Man Luther. London: Faber and Faber, p. 62.Google Scholar
  7. 30.
    For example, see Greven, P. (1977). The Protestant Temperament: Patterns of Child-Rearing, Religious Experience, and the Self in Early America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  8. MacFarlane, A. (1987). Marriage and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction 1300–1840. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Lambie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Lambie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations