Skip to main content
  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

The fear predicated in the title of Robert Frost’s dramatic poem ‘The Fear’ (1915) is an intermedial affect experienced in view of a radical incongruity of word and image. The mismatch becomes evident in the poem as verbal reason attempts to overcome visual imagination but fails to do so and instead accelerates the inherent unnaturalness of the unsettling scene and the affected media. In this fashion, ‘The Fear’ resists psychological readings that would treat it as a symptom of a natural ailment beyond the poetic form as well as such discursive interpretation that would neglect the precarious visual element involved by fixing a verbal meaning. In place of these options, which recall how both Hoffmann and Kleist have been approached in the past, I will argue that ‘The Fear’ exposes the complexity of human experience only against the natural circumstances in which it occurs and in doing so intimates a different understanding for how language may be conceived of. As a result, it will not be enough to claim, as some commentators have done, that ‘The Fear’ grows out of an actual source of threat, a relationship drama, or the idea of an endangered home. Instead, as I will indicate, the horror of Frost’s poem stems from the futility of such assertions by underscoring their explicative inadequacy and by using the words and images they depend on to intensify the latent sensation of brooding unease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dieter Meindl (1996) American Fiction and the Metaphysics of the Grotesque (Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press) p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. W. F. Hegel (1993) Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics, ed. Michael Inwood, trans. Bernard Bosanquet (London: Penguin) p. 40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dieter Meindl (1996) p. 10. Meindl discusses authors such as Frank Norris, Sherwood Anderson and William Faulkner from this angle but not Frost. Meanwhile, Robert Faggen has claimed that North of Boston ‘defined [Frost’s] place among modern poets’ (53). Robert Faggen (2001) ‘Frost and the Questions of Pastoral’ in The Cambridge Companion to Robert Frost, ed. Robert Faggen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 49–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Roger D. Sell (2001) Mediating Criticism: Literary Education Humanized (Amsterdam: John Benjamins) pp. 195–202.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. John F. Lynen (1960) The Pastoral Art of Robert Frost (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frank Lentricchia (1975) Robert Frost: Modern Poetics and the Landscapes of Self (Durham, NC: Duke University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. William H. Pritchard (1993) Robert Frost: A Literary Life Reconsidered (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katherine Kearns (1994) Robert Frost and a Poetics of Appetite (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Jay Parini (2000) Robert Frost: A Life (London: Pimlico)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter J. Stanlis (2008) Robert Frost: The Poet as Philosopher (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reuben A. Brower (1963) The Poetry of Robert Frost: Constellations of Intention (New York, NY: Oxford University Press) p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richard Poirier (1977) Robert Frost: The Work of Knowing (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press) p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tzvetan sTodorov (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, trans. Richard Howard (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edmund Husserl (2005) Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925), trans. John B. Brough (Dordrecht: Springer) pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lessing reprimanded Spence for getting wrong how ‘the moral beings, or those divinities who, among the ancients presided over the virtues and undertook the guidance of human life’ should be represented in the different arts. G. E. Lessing (2009) Laocoon: An Essay upon the Limits of Painting and Poetry, trans. Ellen Frothingham (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications) pp. 68–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christopher Collins (1991) Reading the Written Image: Verbal Play, Interpretation, and the Roots of Iconophobia (University Park: Pennsylvania State University) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (2003) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press) p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Jarkko Toikkanen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Toikkanen, J. (2013). Robert Frost: ‘The Fear’. In: The Intermedial Experience of Horror. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137299093_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics