Abstract
In the first case study, the theoretical framework outlined in the opening chapters will be put into practice through the words and images of Heinrich von Kleist’s famous essay on the marionette theatre. Writing in the context of German Romanticism, Kleist was a torn figure who, on the one hand, believed strongly in the rational tenets of the Enlightenment but, on the other hand, found many of its principles as deeply incongruous with his own world view — and none more radically than those proffered by Kant. Then again, as the Age of Reason was one in which many traditional methods of instruction and tuition — the marionette theatre included — were being undermined,1 it is surely indicative of Kleist’s refusal to give in to the time’s demands that he should choose to demonstrate his thoughts in the unique form of a presentation on the brink of becoming obsolete.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In her study on the decline of visual education during the Age of Reason, Barbara Maria Stafford discusses the significant role assigned to both theatre and marionettes in pre-Enlightenment instruction across Europe, particularly in its Catholic parts. As examples, Stafford mentions the Jesuits’ collegiate theatre, and quotes Christiane Klapisch-Zuber on the ‘bambini or effigies of male babies’ which were used as ‘part of a devotional pedagogy’ in the Florentine quattrocento. In addition, the ‘emblematic puppets’ were also ‘incorporated into a domestic sacred theater’ in order to’ satisfy the needs of the less cultivated minds in the Renaissance household’. Barbara Maria Stafford (1999) Artful Science: Enlightenment Entertainment and the Eclipse of Visual Education (Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press), p. 10
Sebastian Gardner (1999) Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason (London and New York, NY: Routledge) p. 1.
Paul de Man (1996a) ‘Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant’ in Aesthetic Idelogy, ed. Andrzej Warminski (Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press) p. 71.
Immanuel Kant (1993) Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Vasilis Politis, a revised and expanded translation based on J. M. D. Meiklejohn for Everyman’s Library (London and North Clarendon, VT: J. M. Dent and Charles E. Tuttle) p. 65
Paul de Man (1996b) ‘The Epistemology of Metaphor’ in Aesthetic Ideology, ed. Andrzej Warminski (Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press) p. 47.
Heinrich von Kleist (2004) p. 421. See also James Phillips (2007) The Equivocation of Reason: Kleist Reading Kant (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press) p. 3.
Sean Allan (1996) The Plays of Heinrich von Kleist: Ideals and Illusions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p. 34.
Robert E. Helbling (1975) The Major Works of Heinrich von Kleist (New York, NY: New Directions) p. 49.
Paul de Man (1984a) ‘Aesthetic Formalization: Kleist’s “Über das Marionettentheater”’ in The Rhetoric of Romanticism (New York, NY: Columbia University Press) pp. 289–90.
Lucia Ruprecht echoes Herr C in observing how ‘[t]he failure of the Kleistian protagonist... is not that he acts where he should be natural, as Schiller would put it. He fails as performer: he cannot cope with his exposure on stage, or in front of a beholder.’ Lucia Ruprecht (2006) Dances of the Self in Heinrich von Kleist, E. T. A. Hoffmann and Heinrich Heine (Aldershot: Ashgate) p. 41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Jarkko Toikkanen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toikkanen, J. (2013). Heinrich von Kleist: ‘Über das Marionettentheater’. In: The Intermedial Experience of Horror. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137299093_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137299093_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45260-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29909-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)