Abstract
In this chapter the concepts of government, strategy of government, governmentality and a variety of associated concepts shall be elaborated upon. The government of reading will then be analysed to describe how a shift in the strategy of governing literacy helped to constitute dyslexia’s conditions of possibility. These concepts help to provide a theoretical framework, and illuminate the empirical context that makes it possible for me to conduct the precise genealogy of this diagnostic category, a technology of power—dyslexia. This book primarily studies the operations of technologies of power. I am not studying the formation of a governmentality, but rather how they relate to technologies of power. It is necessary to develop a more elaborate description of government and governmentality so that it is evident that my analysis of technologies and machineries of government refer back to a particular reading of the usage of the concepts of government and governmentality in the post-Foucauldian genealogical tradition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
First, Foucault’s co-workers and students who were close to him: Donzelot (1979), Castels (1991), Ewald (1990, 1991), Defert (1991), Pasquino (1978, 1991), Procacci (1978, 1998); second, a group of Anglophone writers, some of whom were initially clustered around the journal Ideology and Consciousness: Rose (1979, 1984, 1985), Gordon (1991), Hacking (1982, 1990), Miller (1986, 1992), Miller and O’Leary (1987), Burchell (1991), Dean (1994, 1995), Cruikshank (1993, 1994), Hunter (1994) and Valverde (1996).
Derrida only makes cursory reference to reading in this long text, spending the majority of his argument describing how speech has been privileged in Western philosophy at the expense of writing.
This is likely to be under the influence of a prominent review by Francis Ewald. Foucault here was being presented as having arguments incompatible with Marxism.
I am using the term ‘break’ here in the sense used by Bachelard, Althusser and Foucault from their concept of the epistemological break (Balibar, 1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Tom Campbell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, T. (2013). Governing Readers from Limitation to Proliferation. In: Dyslexia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297938_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297938_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45221-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29793-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)