Skip to main content

Passionate Love in Hollywood Romantic Dramas 1950s–1970s

  • Chapter
Passionate Love and Popular Cinema
  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

By the end of the 1940s, Hollywood had established a familiar pattern for dealing with passionate love stories in the romantic drama genre. Over the following years, the depiction of passion was modified as a result of a variety of social, political and filmic influences. The United States Supreme Court’s Paramount Decision in 19481 led to the breakdown of the traditional studio system, which played a major part in establishing genres like the romantic drama.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, Herb Bridges. The Filming of Gone with the Wind. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1998: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stuart Brock. ‘Fictions, Feelings and Emotions’ Philosophical Studies 132, no. 2 (2007): 229. Brock’s discussion revolves around the general concept of ‘fiction’ rather than cinema specifically; however, his arguments can include film. He uses David Hume to argue that, ‘The genius in a work of fiction lies not only in the storyline, but also in the resources used to express it’. See Brock. ‘Feelings, Fictions and Emotions’ 229. In the case of these passionate love stories, the visual aesthetics emphasise the emotions. See also David Hume. ‘Of Tragedy’ in Of the Standard of Taste and Other Essays, 219–220. Indianapolis: Bobs-Merrill, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert R. Shandley. Runaway Romances: Hollywoods Postwar Tour of Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Campbell. ‘Hong Kong Faces a “Many Splendored Thing”’ New York Times (3 April 1955): x5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gene Phillips. Beyond the Epic: The Life and Films ofDavid Lean. Lexington, University Press of Kentucky, 2006: 329.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing, directed by Henry King (1955; Beverly Hills, CA: Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2003), DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Notebook, directed by Nick Cassavetes (2004; Burbank, CA: New Line Home Entertainment, 2005), DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosley Crowther. ‘Love Is a Few Splendors Shy: Patrick’s Adaptation of Suyin Novel Opens. Hong Kong Scenery Its Chief Excitement’ Review of Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing. New York Times (19 August 1955): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bosley Crowther. ‘Venice Stars in “Summertime”; Film from “Time of Cuckoo” Opens’ Review of Summertime. New York Times (22 June 1955): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bosley Crowther. ‘Doctor Zhivago’ Review of Doctor Zhivago. New York Times (23 December 1965): 21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pam Cook. Screening the Past: Memory and Nostalgia in Cinema. London: Routledge, 2004: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael Anderegg. David Lean. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1984: 123.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, for example, Robert J. Sternberg. ‘A Triangular Theory of Love’ Psychological Review 93, no. 2 (1986): 24; Anthony Giddens. The Transformation oflntimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cas Wouters. ‘Balancing Sex and Love since the 1960s Sexual Revolution’ in Love and Eroticism, edited by Mike Featherstone, 188. London: Sage, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tamar Jeffers McDonald. ‘Homme-Com: Engendering Change in Contemporary Romantic Comedy’ in Falling in Love Again: Romantic Comedy in Contemporary Cinema, edited by Stacey Abbott and Deborah Jermyn, 149. London: I. B. Tauris, 2009; Tamar Jeffers McDonald. Romantic Comedy: Boy Meets Girl Meets Genre. London: Wallflower, 2007: 38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also Katharina Giltre. Hollywood Romantic Comedy: States of Union 1934–1965. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006. Katharina Giltre reinforces the theme of desire.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Richard Maltby. ‘Narrative 2: Clarity and Ambiguity in Casablanca’ in Hollywood Cinema 2nd edn. 479. Malden: Blackwell, 2003, 479.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gregory D. Black. ‘Changing Perceptions of the Movies: American Catholics Debate Film Censorship’ in Hollywood Spectatorship: Changing Perceptions of Cinema Audiences, edited by Richard Maltby and Melvyn Stokes, 83–84. London: BFI, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Francesca M. Cancian. ‘The Feminization of Love’ Signs 11, no. 4 (Summer 1986): 704. She also notes that the notion of sex has negative effects, as it is sometimes seen as an abusive tool for men.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See also Stanley Cavell. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981: 53. Cavell indi-ates that in classical romantic comedies, the father figure (the mother was usually absent) is there to ‘provide the daughter’s education and to protect her virginity’. In films such as The Lady Eve (Preston Sturges, 1941), The Philadelphia Story (George Cukor, 1940) and It Happened One Night (Frank Capra, 1934), the female protagonists often learn valuable lessons about life and relationships from their fathers mirroring tradi-ions of Shakespearean comedies.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bill Marshall ed. ‘Brigitte Bardot’ in France and the Americas: Culture, Politics and History, vol. 1, 118. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cas Wouters. Sex and Manners: Female Emancipation in the West, 1890–000. London: Sage Publications, 2004: 124. Wouter’s italics.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steve Neale. ‘The Last Good Thing We Ever Had? Revising the Hollywood Renaissance’ in Contemporary American Cinema, edited by Linda Ruth Williams and Michael Hammond, 96–97. London; Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 2005. Box office returns that Neale presents for these two films reflect that the audience enjoyed the change, with 66 million dollars (United States currency) received in the United States and Canada between 1967 and 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Doctor Zhivago, directed by David Lean (1965; Burbank, CA: Warner Home Video, 2001), DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eva Illouz. Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. London: University of California Press, 1997; Mike Featherstone. ‘Love and Eroticism: An Introduction’ Theory, Culture and Society 15, no. 1 (1998): 6. See also Giddens. The Transformation of Intimacy. 39. Giddens explains that sexuality was historically an aspect of an aristocratic lifestyle across Europe, granting women freedom from the ‘chaste’ alternative in marriage.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Arlie Russell Hochschild. The Commercialization ofIntimate Life. London: University of California Press, 2003: 123.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Frank Krutnik. ‘The Faint Aroma of Performing Seals: The “Nervous” Romance and the Comedy of the Sexes’ The Velvet Light Trap 26 (1990): 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tom Grochowski. ‘Neurotic in New York: The Woody Allen touches in Sex and the City’ in Reading Sex and the City, edited by Kim Akass and Janet McCabe, 150. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004. See also McDonald. Romantic Comedy. 149; Mark D. Rubinfeld. Bound to Bond: Gender, Genre and the Hollywood Romantic Comedy. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 2001: 148.

    Google Scholar 

  29. September Affair, directed by William Dieterle (1950; USA: Paramount Pictures, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas Doherty. Teenagers and Teenpics: The Juvenalization of American Movies in the 1950s. revised and expanded edn.. Philadelphia: Temple University, 2002: 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See William Wordsworth. Ode: Intimations of Immortality (originally published 1807; Great Britain: Simon King, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laura Mulvey. ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’ in Feminist Film Theory Reader, edited by Sue Thornham, 58–69. 1975; repr., New York: New York University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krin Gabbard and William Luhr. ‘Introduction’ in Screening Genders, 3–5. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  34. McDonald. ‘Homme-Com’ 149; Shumway. Modern Love. 107; Celestino Deleyto. The Secret Life of Romantic Comedy. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009: 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. David Marshall. ‘The Cinematic Apparatus and the Construction of the Film Celebrity’ in Cultural Studies: An Anthology, edited by Michael Ryan, 1124. Malden: Blackwell, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dennis Bingham. Acting Male: Masculinities in the Films of James Stewart, Jack Nicholson, and Clint Eastwood. New Brunswick: N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1994: 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Erica Todd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Todd, E. (2014). Passionate Love in Hollywood Romantic Dramas 1950s–1970s. In: Passionate Love and Popular Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295385_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics