Skip to main content

Passionate Love in Early Hollywood Romantic Dramas

  • Chapter
Passionate Love and Popular Cinema
  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

One of the first moving images, a Thomas A. Edison Inc. short entitled, The May Irwin Kiss (Thomas A. Edison Inc. 1896),1 illustrates that right from its beginning, cinema had a fascination with romantic affection. At under a minute long, this brief but passionate display was soon adopted by narrative cinema. Early American filmmakers that chose to expand upon May Irwin and James Rice’s show of affection in order to present a passionate love story employed many visual and thematic conventions that would be amplified and adapted to become staples of the Hollywood romantic drama genre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Thomas Schatz. ‘Wartime Stars, Genres, and Production Trends’ in Boom and Bust: The American Cinema in the 1940s, edited by Thomas Schatz, vol. 6, 206. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patrick Colm Hogan. The Mind and Its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 101–110, 232. See also David R. Shumway. Modern Love: Romance, Intimacy, and the Marriage Crisis. New York: New York University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stanley Cavell. Pursuits ofHappiness: The Hollywood Comedy ofRemarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981: 142–145, 153–154, 156, 261.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mike Featherstone. ‘Love and Eroticism: An Introduction’ Theory, Culture and Society 15, no. 1 (1998): 3. Also see James J. Dowd and Nicole R. Pallotta. ‘The End of Romance: Demystification of Love in the PostMern Age’ Sociological Perspectives 43, no. 4, (2000): 551.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Robert J. Sternberg. Cupids Arrow: The Course of Love through Time. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998: 75; Dowd and Pallotta. ‘The End of Romance’ 552.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andreas Capellanus. The Art of Courtly Love. Translated by John Jay Parry, 185. New York: Ungar, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anthony Giddens. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert J. Sternberg. ‘A Triangular Theory of Love’ Psychological Review 93, no. 2 (1986): 124.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for example, Ralph Dengler. ‘The First Screen Kiss and “The Cry of Censorship”’ Journal of Popular Film and Television 7, no. 3 (1979): 266–272. Dengler suggests that the response to the kiss was varied.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, for example, Amy Lawrence. ‘Rudolph Valentino: Italian American’ in Idols ofModernity: Movie Stars of the 1920s, edited by Patrice Petro. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2010: 93.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Emily W. Leider. Dark Lover: The Life and Death ofRudolph Valentino. New York: Faber and Faber, 2003: 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas Schatz. Hollywood Genres: Formulas, Filmmaking and the Studio System. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981: 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schatz. Hollywood Genres. 95–96. Direct quotation comes from the ”‘General Principles” of the MPPDA’s Production Code’, cited in Schatz. Hollywood Genres. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Erica Todd. ‘Pepe le Moko, Cinematic Appropriations and the Passionate Love Story’ in Creative Imitations, and Appropriations: From Cinematic Adaptations to Re-makes, Research Colloquium Select Refereed Papers, edited by Erica Todd, Clement Da Gama, Ellen Pullar and Hilary Radner, 82–83. Dunedin: Centre for Research on National Identity, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Molly Haskell. From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies 2nd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kathleen Rowe. The Unruly Woman: Gender and the Genres of Laughter. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1992: 19.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Ramona Curry. ‘Mae West, Film Censorship and the Comedy of Unmarriage’ in Classical Hollywood Comedy, edited by Kristine Brunovska Karnick and Henry Jenkins, 211–237. New York: Routledge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See, for example, Karen Lury. The Child in Film: Tears, Fears and Fairy Tales. London: I. B. Tauris, 2010: 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robert Ray. A Certain Tendency of the Hollywood Cinema, 1930–1980. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richard Maltby. ‘Narrative 2: Clarity and Ambiguity in Casablanca’ in Hollywood Cinema 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell, 2003, 479.

    Google Scholar 

  21. James Card. ‘Confessions of a Casablanca Cultist’ in The Cult FilmExperience:BeyondAllReason, edited by J. P. Telotte, 72. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dowd and Pallotta. ‘The End of Romance’ 552. Some passionate love stories use the sacrifice as more of a romantic and noble gesture like Intermezzo: A Love Story.

    Google Scholar 

  23. John H. Davis. “‘Still the Same Old Story”: The Refusal of Time to Go By in Casablanca’ Literature/Film Quarterly 18, no. 2 (1990): 123.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anthony Slide. Silent Players: A Biographical and Autobiographical Study of 100 Actors and Actresses. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2002: 216.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, for example, Alistair Phillips. ‘Boyer, Charles (1899–1978)’ in Journeys of Desire: European Actors in Hollywood, a Critical Companion, edited by Alistair Phillips and Ginette Vincendeau, 186. London: BFI, 2006; Todd. ‘Pepe le Moko, Cinematic Appropriations and the Passionate Love Story’ 83.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dennis Bingham. Acting Male: Masculinities in the Films of James Stewart, Jack Nicholson and ClintEastwood. New Brunswick, N. J. Rutgers University Press, 1994: 221.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ella Shohat. ‘Gender and Culture of Empire: Toward a Feminist Ethnography of Cinema’ in Visions of the East: Orientalism in Film, edited by Matthew Bernstein and Gaylyn Studlar, 55. London: I. B. Tauris, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barry Keith Grant. Film Genre: From Iconography to Ideology. London: Wallflower, 2007: 26.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robin Wood. ‘Ideology, Genre, Auteur’ in Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, edited by Gerald Mast, Marshall Cohen and Leo Braudy, 477. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Burnett and Alison. Everybody Comes to Ricks. For example, in the play, Lois (Ilsa) uses Rick to get exit visas, leading Rick to exclaim ‘You bitch!’ (Everybody Comes to Ricks, 2.1.17). The Sam character also says to Rick about Lois, ‘Dat woman jos’ breathes trouble’ (2.2.20).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ora Gelley. ‘Ingrid Bergman’s Star Persona and the Alien Space of Stromboli’ Cinema Journal 47, no. 2 (Winter 2008): 29.

    Google Scholar 

  32. David Denby. ‘The Natural’ review of Notorious: The Life of Ingrid Bergman, by Donald Spoto, New Yorker, 28 July 1997: 72. Quoted in Gelley. ‘Ingrid Bergman’s Star Persona’ 36. In the original text, Gelley had written ‘Charles Cooper’, which I have taken to be a mistake for ‘Gary Cooper’.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gelley highlights this change in view in films like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (Victor Fleming: 1941) where Bergman was able to convey ‘sexual sophistication’; Gelley remarks that films such as those of Alfred Hitchcock in which Bergman starred (Spellbound in 1945 and Notorious in 1946) emphasised the sexualisation of her face through close-up shots, as well as of her body in the latter film in particular. Gelley. ‘Ingrid Bergman’s Star Persona’ 31–33. Notably, when Bergman engaged in an affair in her private life with director Roberto Rossillini, her career was damaged due to the deviation from her prescribed star persona. See, for example, Gelley. ‘Ingrid Bergman’s Star Persona’ 26; David W. Smit. ‘Marketing Ingrid Bergman’ Quarterly Review of Film and Video 22, no. 3 (July—September 2005): 237. Gelley. ‘Ingrid Bergman’s Star Persona’ 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lucy Fischer and Marcia Landy. ‘General Introduction: Backstory’ Stars: The Film Reader, edited by Lucy Fischer and Marcia Landy, 5. New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pandro S. Berman, quoted in Koppes. ‘Regulating the Screen’ 263. Koppes’ italics.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hedy Lamarr’s ‘glamorous’ persona is discussed in Tim Bergfelder. ‘Lamarr, Hedy (Hedwig Kiesler) (1913–2000)’ in Journeys of Desire: European Actors in Hollywood, a Critical Companion, edited by Alistair Phillips and Ginette Vincendeau. London: BFI, 2006: 327–328. See also Todd. Pepe le Moko Cinematic Appropriations and the Passionate Love Story’ in Creative Imitations, and Appropriations, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Broken Blossoms, directed by D. W. Griffith (1919; New York: Kino, 2001), DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sarah Berry. ‘Hollywood Exoticism’ in Stars: The Film Reader, edited by Lucy Fischer and Marcia Landy, 189, 194. New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ian C. Jarvie. ‘Stars and Ethnicity: Hollywood and the United States 1932–1951’ in Stars: The Film Reader, edited by Lucy Fischer and Marcia Landy, 175. New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See for example: James C. Robertson. The Casablanca Man: The Cinema of Michael Curtiz. London: Routledge, 1993: 77; Schatz. ‘Wartime Stars, Genres and Production Trends’ 203. See also, Burnett and Alison. Everybody Comes to Ricks.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See, for example, Matthew Bernstein. ‘Introduction’ in Visions of the East: Orientalism in Film, edited by Matthew Bernstein and Gaylyn Studlar, 1–18. London: I. B. Tauris, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Colin McArthur. The Casablanca File. London: Half Brick Images, 1992: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See for example, James F. Pontusco, ed. Political Philosophy Comes to Ricks: Casablanca and American Civic Culture. Lanham, M. D.: Lexington, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Elaine Hatfield and Susan Sprecher. ‘Measuring Passionate Love in Relationships’ Journal ofAdolescence 9 (1986): 395.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ruth Perlmutter. ‘Memories, Screens, Dreams’ Quarterly Review of Film and Video 22, no. 2 (April-June 2005): 125.

    Google Scholar 

  46. T. J. Ross. ‘The Cult Send-Up: Beat the Devil or Goodbye, Casablanca’ in The Cult Film Experience: Beyond All Reason, edited by J. P. Telotte, 81. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Greg Smith. “I Was Misinformed”: Nostalgia and Uncertainty in Casablanca’ in Film Structure and the Emotion System, 164. Cambridge: New York University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Susannah Radstone. ‘Reconceiving Binaries: The Limits of Memory’ History Workshop Journal 59 (2005): 138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Erica Todd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Todd, E. (2014). Passionate Love in Early Hollywood Romantic Dramas. In: Passionate Love and Popular Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295385_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics