Abstract
In his Thoughts on French Affairs , Edmund Burke draws attention to the “old Epicureans” to highlight the radicalism of French revolutionary thinking. The atheism of the French revolutionaries, Burke remarks, represents a departure from the atheism of old. Unlike the “old Epicureans” who, Burke says, were “an unenterprizing race,” Enlightenment atheists—whom Burke implicitly identifies as adopting a new Epicureanism—have “grown active, designing, turbulent, and seditious.”1 The quest of the French revolutionaries, those “pettifoggers run mad in Paris,” for “abstract and unlimited perfection of power” does not comprehend that a sound constitution is an “elaborate contrivance of a fabric fitted to unite private and public liberty with public force, with order, with peace, with justice, and above all, with institutions formed for bestowing permanence and stability through ages.”2 The fanaticism of revolutionary fervor to “go beyond the barrier” of sound constitutional equilibrium of liberty and order is the necessary outgrowth of theoretical abstraction unhinged from the practicalities of political life. Ultimately for Burke, an “untempered spirit of madness, blindness, immorality, and impiety” defines the revolutionary project.3 The radicalism of the new atheists is a consequence of the two predominant principles of the revolutionary ethos: the fundamental equality of all men and the sovereignty of the people.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Edmund Burke, Further Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Daniel E. Ritchie (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1992), 237.
See, Catherine Wilson’s wonderful study, Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008);
Alison Brown, The Return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010);
W. R. Johnson, Lucretius and the Modern World (London: Gerald Duckworth & Co., 2000). See also, “Part III: Reception” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie and Hardie (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 205–324.
Stephen Greenblatt, The Swerve (New York: W. W. Norton & Co. 2011).
René Descartes, Discourse on Method, trans. Donald A. Cross (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1980), 33.
See also, Leo Strauss, Philosophy and Law, trans. Eve Adler (Albany: SUNY Press, 1995), 36.
All references to Lucretius’s poem are by book and line number. I have relied upon W. H. D. Rouse’s translation De Rerum Natura (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1992)
and occasionally Walter Englert, Lucretius On the Nature of Things (Newburyport: Focus Philosophical Library, 2003), with infrequent minor alterations.
Helvétius, De L’Espri t (London, Dodsley and Co., 1759). The original reads “unde animi constet natura videndum, qau fiant ratione et qua via quaeque gerantur in terries.” Translation my own.
Paul-Henry Baron d’Holbach. The System of Nature, trans. H. D. Robinson (New York: G.W. & A.J. Matsell, 1835).
See Jonathan Israel, Democratic Enlightenment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 34.
Paul-Henry Baron d’Holbach, Good Sense (Whitef ish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing, 2004), 96–97.
Pierre Bayle, Philosophical Commentary on These Words of the Gospel, Luke 14:23 “Compel Them to Come In, That My House May Be Full,” ed. John Kilcullen and Chandran Kukathas (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005), 67–68.
Pierre Bayle, The Dictionary of Historical and Critical of Mr. Peter Bayle, trans. Pierre Des Maizeaux, vol. 3 (London: J.J. and P. Knapton, 1735), 923.
See Robert Bartlett’s excellent treatment of Bayle’s project “On the Politics of Faith and Reason: The Project of Enlightenment in Pierre Bayle and Montesquieu,” Journal of Politics 63, no. 1 (Feb. 2001): 1–28.
Pierre Bayle, Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet, trans. Robert Bartlett (Albany: SUNY Press, 2000), 221–222.
Copyright information
© 2012 John Colman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colman, J. (2012). Introduction. In: Lucretius as Theorist of Political Life. Recovering Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292322_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292322_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45086-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29232-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)