Abstract
Health policy in the UK is experiencing a curious double movement. On the one hand, in what was long considered a highly centralized unitary state, the central UK government is showing steadily less interest in the health policies and outcomes of devolved Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. And on the other hand, within England and the individual devolved health systems, policymakers have created increasingly centralized systems that aspire to dislodge doctors and local boards from their positions of importance. How is it that the UK government simultaneously involves itself in ever more intimate decisions in English health policy while disengaging from most aspects of devolved health policy? The answers, in large part, are to be found in the constitutional structure of the UK. In a country dominated by the English and governed by strong parliamentary governments, there is little to interest a UK government in Scotland and much to interest them in the performance of the English NHS. Electoral concerns lead ministers into concern for the English NHS, while the politics of a multinational state discourage UK government interest in Northern Irish, Scottish, orWelsh policy. The result is the paradox of constitutional decentralization and policy centralization that we see today.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aughey, A. (2007). The Politics of Englishness. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Birrell, D. (2009). The Impact of Devolution on Social Policy. Bristol: Policy.
Bogdanor, V. (1999).Devolution in theUnited Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cairney, P. (2007). Using devolution to set the agenda: The smoking ban in Scotland.British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(1), 73–89.
Carmichael, P., Knox, C., & Osborne, R. (2007). (Eds.) Devolution and Constitutional Change in Northern Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Commission on Scottish Devolution (2009). Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century. Edinburgh: Commission on Scottish Devolution.
Connolly, S., Mays, N., & Bevan, G. (2010). Funding and Performance of Healthcare Systems in the Four Countries of the UK Before and After Devolution. London: The Nuffield Trust.
Connolly, S., Mays, N., & Bevan, G. (2010). Funding and Performance of Healthcare Systems in the Four Countries of the UK Before and After Devolution. London: The Nuffield Trust.
Donnelly, P., & Whittle, P. (2008). After the smoke has cleared – reflections on Scotland’s tobacco control legislation. Public Health, 122, 762–766.
Gorsky, M., & Sheard, S. (2006). Introduction. In M. Gorsky, & S. Sheard (Eds.),Financing Medicine: The British Experience Since 1750 (pp. 1–15). Abingdon: Routledge.
Greer, S. L. (2004). Territorial Politics and Health Policy: UK Health Policy in Comparative Perspective. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Greer, S. L. (2007a). The fragile divergence machine: Citizenship, policy divergence, and intergovernmental relations. In A. Trench (Ed.), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom (pp. 136–159). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Greer, S. L. (2007b). Nationalism and Self-Government: The Politics of Autonomy in Scotland and Catalonia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Greer, S. L. (2009). (Ed.) Devolution and Social Citizenship in the United Kingdom. Bristol:Policy.
Greer, S.L. (2010a). Devolution and health: Structure, process and outcome since 1998.In Lodge, & Schmuecker (Eds.), Devolution in Practice 3 (pp. 141–166). Newcastleupon-Tyne: ippr north.
Greer, S. L. (2010b). Options and the lack of options: Healthcare politics and policy. In V. Uberoi, A. Coutts, I. McLean, & D. Halpern (Eds.), Political Quarterly (79: 117–132.
Greer, S. L., & Trench, A. (2010). Intergovernmental relations and health in Great Britain after devolution. Policy and Politics, 38(4), 509–529.
Greer, S. L., I. Wilson, E. Stewart, and P. Donnelly (2012). Health Boards and Alternative Pilots: Evaluation Report. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.
Hazell, R., & Rawlings, R. (2005). (Eds.) Devolution, Law Making and the Constitution. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Holliday, I. (1992). Scottish limits to Thatcherism. Political Quarterly, 63(4), 448–459.
Independent Commission on Funding & Finance for Wales (Holtham Commission)(2010). Fairness and Accountability: A New Funding Settlement forWales. Cardiff:Welsh Assembly Government.
Mays, N., & Bevan, G. (1987). Resource Allocation in the Health Service: A Review of the Methods of the Resource Allocation Working Party. London: Bedford Square Press.
McLean, I., Lodge, G., & Schmuecker, K. (2009). Social citizenship and intergovernmental finance. In S. L. Greer (Ed.), Devolution and Social Citizenship in the United Kingdom (pp. 137–160). Bristol: Policy.
Mitchell, J. (2003). Governing Scotland: The Invention of Administrative Devolution. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mitchell, J. (2007). The united kingdom as a state of unions: Unity of government, equality of political rights and diversity of institutions. In A. Trench (Ed.), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom (pp. 134–145). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mohan, J. (2002). Planning, Markets, and Hospitals. London: Routledge.
The Northern Veto (2009). The Northern Veto. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Rawlings, R. (2003). Delineating Wales: Constitutional, Legal and Administrative Aspects of National Devolution. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W., Carmichael, P., McMillan, J., & Massey, A. (2003). Decentralizing the Civil Service. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Scotland Office (2009). Scotland’s Future in the United Kingdom, cm7738. London:
Stationery Office.
Simeon, R. (2003). The long-term care decision: Social rights and democratic diversity. In R. Hazell (Ed.), The State and the Nations: The Third Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom (pp. 215–232). Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Sutherland, K., & Coyle, N. (2009). Quality in Healthcare in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland: An Intra-UK Chart Book. London: The Health Foundation.
Trench, A. (2006). The Government of Wales Act 2006: The next steps in devolution for Wales. Public Law, 1, 687–696.
Trench, A. (2007). (Ed.) Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Trench, A. (2009). The Calman commission and Scotland’s disjointed constitutional debates. Public Law. October 2009, 686–96
Trench, A. (2010). Wales and the Westminster model. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(1), 117–133.
Trench, A., & Jarman, H. (2007). The practical outcomes of devolution: Policy-Making across the UK. In A. Trench (Ed.), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom. pp 45–56 Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Welshman, J. (2006). Inequalities, regions and hospitals: The resource allocation working party. In M. Gorsky & S. Sheard (Eds.),Financing Medicine: The British Experience Since 1750 (pp. 221–241), London, UK.
Wilford, R. (2001). Aspects of the Belfast Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilford, R. (2010). Northern Ireland: The politics of constraint. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(1), 134–155.
Wincott, D. (2006). Social policy and social citizenship: Britain’s welfare states. Publius, 36(1), 169–189.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Joan Costa-Font and Scott L. Greer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greer, S.L. (2013). The Rise and Fall of Territory in UK Health Politics. In: Costa-Font, J., Greer, S.L. (eds) Federalism and Decentralization in European Health and Social Care. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291875_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291875_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33040-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29187-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)