Gender and Work-Family Conflict: A Secondary Analysis of Timescapes Data
- 107 Downloads
Recent decades have seen a growing interest in the reuse of extant qualitative data and a remarkable expansion in the possibilities for doing so with the exponential growth in electronic data storage and archiving capacity. Research funders have sought to encourage reuse and data sharing through investing in archiving infrastructure and requiring research bids to include proposals for depositing and sharing data (Van den Eynden et al. 2011, Neale and Bishop 2012). The secondary analysis of large data sets is a standard practice in quantitative research, but the secondary analysis of qualitative data entails unique challenges. There has been some controversy over the logic of undertaking secondary analysis of qualitative data. The orientation of qualitative research to context, specificity and meaning, and the embeddedness of data in the purposes of the primary researchers, in their disciplinary and theoretical concerns, and in the specific contexts through which they generate data makes their secondary analysis a potentially fraught undertaking. Alongside epistemological issues and methodological questions are a range of ethical challenges. These issues are widely discussed and addressed in detail elsewhere (e.g. Bishop 2006, 2009, Mason 2007, Hammersley 2010, Irwin and Winterton 2012, Mauthner and Parry 2012). Most concur that secondary analysis has a role to play both in enhancing sociological understanding, as well as a potentially valuable role in informing policy.
KeywordsSecondary Analysis Family Life Project Team Time Stress Life Balance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bishop, L. (2006) ‘A proposal for archiving context for secondary analysis’, Methodological Innovations Online, 1(2). Available at: www.methodologicalinnovations.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/2.-Bishop-pp10-20.pdf.
- Bishop, L. (2009) ‘Ethical sharing and reuse of qualitative data’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3): 255–272.Google Scholar
- Hammersley, M (2010) ‘Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues’, Sociological Research Online, 15(1). Available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html.
- Irwin, S. (2005) Reshaping Social Life, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Irwin, S. (2011) ‘Working across qualitative and quantitative data: Childhood, youth and social inequalities’, Forum 21. European Journal on Child and Youth Research, 6: 58–63.Google Scholar
- Irwin, S. and Winterton, M. (2011a) Debates in Qualitative Secondary Analysis: Critical Reflections, Timescapes Working Paper no. 4. Available at http://www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/WP4-March-2011.pdf.
- Irwin, S. and Winterton, M. (2011b) Timescapes Data and Secondary Analysis: Working across the Projects, Timescapes Working Paper no. 5. Available at http://www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/WP5-March-2011.pdf.
- Irwin, S. and Winterton, M. (2012) ‘Qualitative secondary analysis and social explanation’, Sociological Research Online, 17(2). Available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/2/4.html.
- Mason, J. (2007) ‘“Re-using” qualitative data: On the merits of an investigative epistemology’, Sociological Research Online, 12(3). Available at www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/3.html.
- Rose, J. (2011) ‘Finding time to balance: Perceptions of time pressure and work-life balance’, paper presented to Community, Work and Family 4th International conference, University of Tampere, Finland, 19–21 May 2011.Google Scholar
- Thomson, R., Kehily, M. J., Hadfield, L. and Sharpe, S. (2011) Making Modern Mothers, Bristol: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Van den Eynden, V., Corti, L., Woollard, M., Bishop, L. and Horton, L. (2011) ‘Managing and sharing data: Best practice for researchers’, UK Data Archive.Google Scholar
- Walby, S. (1997) Gender Transformations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar