Advertisement

Generations and Aspirations: Young People’s Thinking About Relationships With Siblings and Hopes for Their Parents Over Time

  • Rosalind Edwards
  • Susie Weller
  • Sarah Baker
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

Appeals to the social category of generation — particularly the differential opportunities available between generations — are found on both the political right and left as well as in the media in Britain.1 In effect, generation is ‘an emergent master-narrative on which actors of quite different persuasion converge as they seek to reshape prevalent conceptions of obligation, collective action and community’ (White 2013: 217). Generation is posed as the central social division in society in an attempt to shape social policy in particular ways. It is questionable, however, whether or not such ‘generationalism’ has any purchase beyond its political practice, reflecting and creating wider social understandings.

Keywords

Young People Young Generation Baby Boomer Small World Life Chance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alanen, L. (2001) ‘Explorations in generational analysis’, in L. Alanen and B. Mayall (eds) Conceptualising Adult-Child Relationships, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2013) Distant Love, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, F. (2010) What Did the Baby Boomers Ever Do for Us? London: Biteback.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1993) Sociology in Question, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Carter-Wall, C. and Whitfield, G. (2012) The Role of Aspirations, Attitudes and Behaviour in Closing the Educational Attainment Gap, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation: www.jrf.org.uk/site/files/jrf/education-achievement-poverty-summary.pdf [Accessed 1 September 12].Google Scholar
  6. Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (1999) Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, R. and Weller, S. (2010) ‘Trajectories from youth to adulthood: Choice and structure for young people before and during recession’, Special Issue: Lived Experience Through Economic Downturn in Britain — Perspectives Across Time and Across the Lifecourse (eds. R. Edwards and S. Irwin), 21st Century Society, 5(2): 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Furlong, A. and Cartmel, F. (2007) Young People and Social Change: New Perspectives. 2nd Edn, Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. George, L. K. and Gold, D. T. (1991) ‘Life course perspectives on intergenerational and generational connections’, in S. K. Pfeifer and M. B. Sussman (eds) ‘Families: Intergenerational and generational connections’, Binghampton NY: Haworth Press. Also in Part 1/2, Marriage and Family Review, 16(1/2): 67–88.Google Scholar
  10. Gubrium, J. F. and Rittman, M. R. (1991) ‘Small worlds and intergenerational relationships’, in S. K. Pfeifer and M. B. Sussman (eds) ‘Families: Intergenerational and generational connections’, Binghampton NY: Hawarth Press. Also appears in Part 1/2, Marriage and Family Review, 16(1/2): 89–102.Google Scholar
  11. Harden, J., Backett-Milburn, K., MacLean, A. and Jamieson, L. (2012) ‘Hopes for the future: Parents’ and children’s narratives of children’s future employment orientations’, Sociological Research Online, 17(2): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/2/13.html [Accessed 29 August 12].
  12. Hirshorn, B. (1991) ‘Sharing or competition: Multiple views of the intergenerational flow of society’s resources’, in S. K. Pfeifer and M. B. Sussman (eds) ‘Families: Intergenerational and generational connections’, Binghampton NY: Haworth Press. Also appears in Part 1, Marriage and Family Review, 16(1/2): 175–193.Google Scholar
  13. Howker, E. and Malik, S. (2010) Jilted Generation: How Britain Has Bankrupted Its Youth, London: Icon.Google Scholar
  14. Kohli, M. (2006) ‘Generational changes and generational equity’, in M. Johnson, V. L. Bengtson, P. Coleman and T. Kirkwood (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 518–526.Google Scholar
  15. Mannheim, K. (1952) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Perry, E. and Francis, B. (2010) The Social Class Gap for Educational Attainment: A Review of the Literature, London: Royal Society of Arts: www.thersa.org/_data/assets/pdf_file/0019/367003/RSA-Social-Justice-paper.pdf [Accessed 1 September 12].Google Scholar
  17. Pilcher, J. (1995) Age and Generation in Modern Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Prout, A. (2000) ‘Children’s participation: Control and self-realisation in British late modernity’, Children & Society, 14(4): 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ribbens McCarthy, J., Edwards, R. and Gillies, V. (2003) Making Families: Moral of Parenting and Step-parenting, Durham: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Tarrant, A. (2012) ‘Grandfathering: The construction of new identities and masculinities’, in S. Arber and V. Timonen (eds) Contemporary Grandparenting: Changing Family Relationships in Global Contexts, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Troll, L. and Bengtson, V. with McFarland, D. (1979) ‘Generations in the family’, in W. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye and I. L. Reiss (eds) Contemporary Theories About the Family: Research-Based Theories, Vol. 1, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Weller, S. (2006) ‘Situating (young) teenagers in geographies of children and youth’, Children’s Geographies, 4(1): 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weller, S. and Edwards, R. with Stephenson, R. (2011) Researching Children’s Lateral Relationships Over Time: Methodological and Ethical Lessons from a Qualitative Longitudinal Study, Families & Social Capital Research Group Working Paper No. 30, London: London South Bank University.Google Scholar
  24. White, J. (2013) ‘Thinking generations’, British Journal of Sociology, 64(2): 216–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willetts, D. (2010) The Pinch: How Baby Boomers Took Their Children’s Future — And How They Can Give It Back, London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosalind Edwards, Susie Weller and Sarah Baker 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalind Edwards
  • Susie Weller
  • Sarah Baker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations