Skip to main content

Patterns of Global Governmentality and Sovereignty

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations ((PSIR))

Abstract

This volume on the Diffusion of Power engages in the debate on changing structures of global governance by exploring different ways to redefine concepts and the analysis of power and governance. Whereas governance is usually referred to as an indication of the reduction of the role of sovereign states, where the ‘Westphalian model’ has become outmoded or even redundant, this chapter takes a different perspective by investigating what these developments mean for our understanding of yet another key (and contested) concept of International Relations (IR): state sovereignty. More specifically, it elaborates how governance works through sovereignty. By this it does not mean the continued importance of states among the plurality of actors within governance structures, but rather how sovereign statehood itself is the outcome of a particular regime of knowledge that projects sovereign states as objects of regulation and government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aalberts, Tanja E. (2004) ‘The Sovereignty Game States Play: (Quasi-)States in the International Order’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 17 (2), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aalberts, Tanja E. (2010) ‘Playing the Game of Sovereign States: Charles Manning’s Constructivism Avant-la-Lettre’, European Journal of International Relations 16 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aalberts, Tanja E. (2012) Constructing Sovereignty between Politics and Law (London/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aalberts, Tanja E. and Wouter G. Werner. (2008) ‘Sovereignty Beyond Borders: Sovereignty, Self-Defense and the Disciplining of States’, in Rebecca Adler-Nissen and Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen (eds) Sovereignty Games. Instrumentalising State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan), 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aalberts, Tanja E. and Wouter G. Werner. (2011) ‘Mobilising Uncertainty and the Making of Responsible Sovereigns’, Review of International Studies 37 (5), 2183–2200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Emanuel (2002) ‘Constructivism and International Relations’, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 95–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James. (1996) ‘The Shifting Stage of Politics: New Medieval and Postmodern Territorialities?’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14 (2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anghie, Antony. (2005) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, Richard K. (1988) ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’, Millennium 17 (2), 227–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael and Raymond Duvall. (2005) Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, Jens. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, Jens. (2008) ‘Sovereignty and the Linguistic Turn’, in Rebecca Adler-Nissen and Thomas Gammeltoft-Hanse (eds) Sovereignty Games. Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond (Basingtoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulac, Stéphane. (2003) ‘The Social Power of Bodin’s “Sovereignty” and International Law’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 4 (1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulac, Stéphane. (2004) The Power of Language in the Making of International Law: The Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westphalia (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, Thomas J. and Cynthia Weber (eds)(1996) State Sovereignty as Social Construct (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Hedley. (1995 [1977]) The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd edition (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry. (2004) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Mitchell. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Mitchell. (2007) Governing Societies. Political Perspectives on Domestic and International Rule (Maidenhead: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Débrix, François. (1999) ‘Space Quest: Surveillance, Governance and the Panoptic Eye of the United Nations’, Alternatives 24 (3), 269–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Débrix, François (ed.)(2003) Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World (London: M. E. Sharpe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Michael. (1995) ‘Sovereignty and Governmentality: From the Problematics of the “New World Order” to the Ethical Problematic of the World Order’, Alternatives 20 (3), 323–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Michael and Julian Reid. (2001) ‘Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security, and War’, Millennium 30 (1), 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchhardt, Heinz. (1999) ‘Westphalian System — Zur Problematik einer Denkfigur’, Historische Zeitschrift 269 (2), 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchhardt, Heinz. (2004) ‘Peace Treaties from Westphalia to the Revolutionary Era’, in Randall Lesaffer (ed.) Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the Late Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 45–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison (London: Allen Lane).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1980a) ‘Truth and Power’, in Colin Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (Brighton: Harvester Press), 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1980b) ‘Two Lectures’, in Colin Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (Brighton: Harvester Press), 78–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’, Critical Inquiry 8 (4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (2007 [1978]) Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78 (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. (2003) ‘From Discipline to Flexibilization? Rereading Foucault in the Shadow of Globalization’, Constellations 10 (2), 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jörg. (2001) ‘The Meaning of New Medievalism’, European Journal of International Relations 7 (4), 475–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. (1985) The Nation-State and Violence. Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, Luke. (2010) ‘The Antecedents of “Sovereignty as Responsibility”’, European Journal of International Relations 17 (2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, Stacie E. and Daniel H. Nexon. (2005) ‘Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 11 (1), 9–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Gerrit W. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Colin. (1991) ‘Governmental Rationality: An Introduction’, in Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality University of Chicago Press), 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Leo. (1948) ‘The Peace of Westphalia 1648–1948’, American Journal of International Law 42, 20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzini, Stefano. (2000) ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 6 (2), 147–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzini, Stefano. (2005) ‘The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis’, Millennium 3, 495–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, Barry. (1998) ‘Divide and Rule: The International Character of Modern Citizenship’, European Journal of Social Theory 1 (1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, Barry. (2005) ‘Politics as Government: Michel Foucault’s Analysis of Political Reason’, Alternatives 30 (4), 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsley, F. H. (1986) Sovereignty, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jeff. (1998) ‘Security! What Do You mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier’, European Journal of International Relations 4 (2), 226–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Jonathan. (2010) ‘The Limits of Governmentality: Social Theory and the International’, European Journal of International Relations 16 (2), 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi, Martti. (1991) ‘The Future of Statehood’, Harvard International Law Journal 32 (2), 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi, Martti. (2002) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi, Martti. (2005[1989]) From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. (1993) ‘Westphalia and All That’, in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy; Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press), 235–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. (1995) ‘Compromising Westphalia’, International Security 20 (3), 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larner, Wendy and William Walters. (2004) ‘Globalization as Governmentality’, Alternatives 29 (5), 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leira, Halvard. (2009) ‘Taking Foucault beyond Foucault: Inter-state Governmentality in Early Modern Europe’, Global Society 23 (4), 475–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, Andrew. (1996) ‘Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State’, European Journal of International Relations 2 (1), 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz, Ronnie and James Rowe. (2005) Globalization, Governmentality, and Global Politics. Regulation for the Rest of Us? (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwenheim, Oded. (2008) ‘Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’’, Third World Quarterly 29 (2), 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Gene M. and Michael Mastanduno (eds)(1995) Beyond Westphalia?: National Sovereignty and International Intervention (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, Michael. (2003) ‘Governmentality: Towards a Foucauldian Framework for the Study of International Governmental Organizations’, Cooperation and Conflict 38 (4), 361–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, Michael. (2006) ‘Foucault and World Politics: Promises and Challenges of Extending Governmentality Theory to the European and Beyond’, Millennium — Journal of International Studies 35 (1), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. and Ole Jacob Sending. (2007) ‘The International as Governmentality’, Millennium 35 (3), 677–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. and Ole Jacob Sending. (2010) Governing the Global Polity. Practice, Mentality, Rationality: Michigan University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijman, Janne. (2004) The Concept of International Legal Personality, an Inquiry into the History and Theory of International Law (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Osiander, Andreas. (2001) ‘Sovereignty, International Relations and the Westphalian Myth’, International Organization 55 (2), 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Richard Warren and Bill Maurer (eds)(2003) Globalization under Construction: Governmentality, Law, and Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. (2001) Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, Brent L. (2000) ‘Foucaultian Rights?’, Social Science Journal 37 (3), 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, Richard and Christian Reus-Smit. (1998) ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations 4 (3), 259–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, Christian. (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State. Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N. and Ernst-Otto Czempiel (eds)(1992) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John Gerard. (1983) ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Towards a Neorealist Synthesis’, World Politics 35 (2), 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sending, Ole Jacob and Iver B. Neumann. (2006) ‘Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power’, International Studies Quarterly 50 (3), 651–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Malcolm N. (2003) International Law, 5th edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, Carsten. (2007) ‘Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm?’, American Journal of International Law 101 (1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, Mariana. (2007) ‘Genealogies of European States: Foucauldian Reflections’, Economy and Society 36 (1), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, William and Jens Henrik Haar. (2005) ‘Governmentality and Political Studies’, European Political Science 4 (3), 288–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979) Theory of International Politics (Reading: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization 41 (3), 335–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization 46 (2), 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. (1994) ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, American Political Science Review 88 (2), 384–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. (1999) A Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Wouter G. (2004) ‘State Sovereignty and International Legal Discourse’, in Ige F. Dekker and Werner G. Werner (eds) Governance and International Legal Theory (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), 125–157.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Wouter G. and De Wilde, Jaap H. (2001) ‘The Endurance of Sovereignty’, European Journal of International Relations, 7 (3), 283–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, Martin. (1977) Systems of States (Leicester: Leicester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildhaber, Luzius. (1983) ‘Sovereignty and International Law’, in Douglas M. Johnston (ed.) The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine and Theory (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff), 425–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig J. J. (1958) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edition (London: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Oran. (1994) International Governance. Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, Mark W. (1992) ‘The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance’, in James N. Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel (eds) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 58–101.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zanotti, Laura. (2005) ‘Governmentalizing the Post-Cold War International Regime: The UN Debate on Democratization and Good Governance’, Alternatives 30, 461–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehfuss, Maya. (2002) Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Tanja E. Aalberts

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aalberts, T.E. (2012). Patterns of Global Governmentality and Sovereignty. In: Guzzini, S., Neumann, I.B. (eds) The Diffusion of Power in Global Governance. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283559_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics