Abstract
Public discourse and media coverage of environmental issues are often studied in terms of their potential to convey expert knowledge to a broader public or as a setting in which key stakeholders (for example, environmental movements and organizations, business actors) can state their positions (Hansen 1993). However, environmental issues also matter as powerful attractors of public attention and media salience. As such, they can constitute rhetorical resources available to multiple actors to support and position their claims. More broadly, as readily available (and in certain cases, undisputable) frames, they can be used to contextualize and give prominence and justification to a variety of other issues and themes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Benford, D. and Snow, D. A. (2000) ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.’ Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39.
Berk, R. A. and Fovell, R. G. (1999) ‘Public Perceptions of Climate Change: A “Willingness to Pay” Assessment.’ Climatic Change 41: 413–46.
Bord, R. J., Fischer, A. and O’Connor, R. E. (1998) ‘Public Perceptions of Global Warming: United States and International Perspectives.’ Climate Research 11: 75–84.
Bostrom, A., Granger-Morgan, M., Fischoff, B. and Read, D. (1994) ‘What Do People Know About Climate Change? Part 1: Mental Models.’ Risk Analysis 14: 959–70.
Boykoff, M. T. and Boykoff, J. M. (2004) ‘Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press.’ Global Environmental Change 14: 125–36.
Brossard, D., Shanahan, J. and McComas, K. (2004) ‘Are Issue-Cycles Culturally Constructed? A Comparison of French and American Coverage of Global Climate Change.’ Mass Communication and Society 7(3): 359–77.
Bucchi, M. (2010) Scientisti e antiscientisti: Perché scienza e società non si capiscono. Bologna: Il Mulino [Scientism and Antiscientism: Why Science and Society Don’t Understand Each Other, eng. Trans. Forthcoming]
Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
Dunlap, R. E. and Scarce, R. (1991) ‘The Polls-Poll Trends: Environment Problems and Protection.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 55(4): 651–72.
Eder, K. (1996) The Social Construction of Nature, A Sociology of Ecological Enlightenment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Entman, R. A. (1991) ‘Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents.’ Journal of Communication 41(4): 6–27.
Entman, R. (1993) ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.’ Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–8.
Gamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A. (1989) ‘Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.’ American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 1–37.
Hansen, A. (1993) The Mass Media and Environmental Issues. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Hornig, S. (1990) ‘Science Stories: Risk, Power, and Perceived Emphasis.’ Journalism Quarterly 67(4): 767–76.
Hornig, S. (1993) ‘Reading Risk: Public Response to Print Media Accounts of Technological Risk.’ Public Understanding of Science 2(2): 95–109.
Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kempton, W. (1991) ‘Lay Perspectives on Global Climate Change.’ Global Environmental Change 1: 183–208.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. and Whitmarsh, L. (2007) ‘Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.’ Global Climate Change 17: 445–59.
Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., de França Doria, M., Haynes, K. and Vincent, K. (2006) ‘Does Tomorrow Ever Come? Disaster Narrative and Public Perceptions of Climate Change.’ Public Understanding of Science 15(4): 435–57.
Marks, L. A., Kalaitzandonakes, N., Wilkins, L. and Zakharova, L. (2007) ‘Mass Media Framing of Biotechnology News.’ Public Understanding of Science 16(2): 183–203.
Mazur, A. and Lee, J. (1993) ‘Sounding the Global Alarm: Environmental Issues in the U.S. National News’Social Studies of Science 23(4): 681–720.
McCombs, M. E. and Shaw, D. L. (1972) ‘The Agenda-Setting Function in Mass Media.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–87.
Olausson, U. (2009) ‘Global Warming — Global Responsibility? Media Frames of Collective Action and Scientific Certainty.’ Public Understanding of Science 18(4): 421–36.
Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. (2003) Public Perceptions of Risk, Science and Governance: Main Findings of a British Survey of Five Risk Cases. Norwich: University of East Anglia and MORI.
Seacrest, S., Kuzelka, R. and Leonard, R. (2000) ‘Global Climate Change and Public Perception: The Challenge of Translation.’ Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36(2): 253–263.
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K. and Benford, R. D. (1986) ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.’ American Sociological Review 51(4): 464–81.
Sontag, S. (1977) Illness as Metaphor. New York: Straus & Giroux.
Sontag, S. (1988) Aids and Its Metaphors. New York: Straus & Giroux.
Stamm, K. R, Clark, F. and Reynolds Eblacas, P. (2000) ‘Mass Communication and Public Understanding of Environmental Problems: The Case of Global Warming.’ Public Understanding of Science 9(3): 219–37.
Ten Eyck, T. A. and Williment, M. (2003) ‘The National Media and Things Genetic: Coverage in the New York Times (1971–2001) and the Washington Post (1977–2001).’ Science Communication 25(2): 129–52.
Ungar, S. (2000) ‘Knowledge, Ignorance and the Popular Culture: Climate Change versus the Ozone Hole.’ Public Understanding of Science 9(3): 297–312.
Weingart, P., Engels, A. and Pansegrau, P. (2000) ‘Risks of Communication: Discourses on Climate Change in Science, Politics, and the Mass Media.’ Public Understanding of Science 9(3): 261–83.
Zehr, S. C. (2000) ‘Public Representations of Scientific Uncertainty about Global Climate Change.’ Public Understanding of Science 9(2): 85–103.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Lorenzo Beltrame, Massimiano Bucchi, and Barbara Mattè
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beltrame, L., Bucchi, M., Mattè, B. (2013). Climate Change as a Rhetorical Resource and Masterframe: An Analysis of the Daily Press Coverage and Public Opinion in Italy. In: Salvatore, A., Schmidtke, O., Trenz, HJ. (eds) Rethinking the Public Sphere Through Transnationalizing Processes. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283207_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283207_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44894-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28320-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)