Abstract
Public sphere reloaded — reevaluating its claims in response to transnationalization The public sphere has emerged as a key concept in recent social scientific debates on the performance of liberal democracy and the democratic self-constitution of society. Building on Habermas’ (1989 [1962]) seminal work on the transformation of the public sphere, this notion has been employed to conceptualize the social and communicative underpinnings of democratic politics in modern societies. Based on the separation between the public and the private, the public sphere provides a historically bound and culturally specific solution for the creation of social bonds beyond the family (Eder 2006). Specifically, the public sphere offers a bridge between the fragmentation of modern social life on the one hand and the concept of a solidarity-oriented and democratically organized society on the other. The key ingredient to this solution is theorized as rational public discourse that provides the communicative link between autonomous individuals as ‘citizens’, unifies them as ‘the people’, and integrates them into a mode of collective self-government (Eder 2003; 2006; Peters 1994; Somers 1995). Questions have been raised, however, about the generalizability of the public sphere model in terms of understanding how different societies construct social bonds and constitute themselves as democratic ‘publics’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Bauböck, R. (1994) Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Baumann, Z. (2006) Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Baumann, Z. (2011) Collateral Damage: Social Inequalities in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Beck, U. (2003) ‘Toward a New Critical Theory with Cosmopolitan Intent.’ Constellations 10(4): 453–67.
Beck, U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity.
Benhabib, S. (2011) ‘Another Universalism: On the Unity and Diversity of Human Rights’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge: Polity, 57–76.
Bohman, J. (1998) ‘The Globalization of the Public Sphere: Cosmopolitan Publicity and the Problem of Cultural Pluralism.’ Philosophy and Social Criticism 24: 199–216.
Brubaker, R. (1992) Citizenshipand Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Calhoun, C. (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Calhoun, C. (2007) Nations Matter: Culture, History, and the Cosmopolitan Dream. New York: Routledge.
Chambers, S. (2009) ‘Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?’ Political Theory 37(3): 323–50.
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (1997) ‘Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy.’ European Law Journal 3(4): 313–42.
Cohen, J. L. and Arato, A. (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Doucet, M. G. (2005) ‘The Democratic Paradox and Cosmopolitan Democracy.’ Millennium — Journal of International Studies 34: 137–55.
Dryzek, J. (2005) ‘Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia.’ Political Theory 33(2): 218–41.
The Economist (2011) The Future of News: Back to the Coffee House.July 7, 2011: 11.
Eder, K. (1985) Geschichte als Lernprozess: Zur Pathogenese politischer Modernität in Deutschland. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Eder, K. (1995) ‘The Institutionalisation of Environmentalism: Ecological Discourse and the Second Transformation of the Public Sphere’, in B. Wynne, B. Szerszinski and S. Lash (eds.), Risk, Modernity and the Environment: Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage, 202–23.
Eder, K. (1999a) ‘Integration durch Kultur? Das Paradox der Suche nach einer europäischen Identität’, in R. Viehoff and R. T. Segers (eds.), Kultur, Identität, Europa: Über die Schwierigkeiten und Möglichkeiten einer Konstruktion. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 147–79.
Eder, K. (1999b) ‘Societies Learn and Yet the World Is Hard to Change.’ European Journal of Social Theory 2(2): 195–215.
Eder, K. (2000a) ‘Konstitutionsbedingungen einer transnationalen Gesellschaft in Europa: Zur nachholenden Modernisierung Europas’, in W. Heyde and T. Schaber (eds.), Demokratisches Regieren in Europa? Baden-Baden: Nomos, 87–102.
Eder, K. (2000b) Kulturelle Indentitäten zwischen Utopie und Tradition: Soziale Bewegungen als Ort gesellschaftlicher Lernprozesse. Frankfurt a. M: Campus.
Eder, K. (2000c) ‘Zur Transformation nationalstaatlicher Öffentlichkeit in Europa. Von der Sprachgemeinschaft zur issuespezifischen Kommun-kationsgemeinschaft.’ Berliner Journal für Soziologie 3: 167–84.
Eder, K. (2003) ‘Öffentlichkeit und Demokratie’, in M. Jachtenfuchs and B. Kohler-Koch (eds.), Europäische Integration. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 85–120.
Eder, K. (2006) ‘The Public Sphere.’ Theory, Culture & Society 23(2-3): 607–11.
Eder, K. (2008). ‘Symbolic Power and Cultural Differences: A Power Model of Political Solutions to Cultural Differences,’ in P. Mouritsen and K. E. Jørgensen (eds.), ConstitutingCommunities: Political Solutions to Cultural Difference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 31–52.
Eder, K. and Giesen, B. (2001) ‘Citizenship and the Making of a European Society’, in K. Eder and B. Giesen (eds.), European Citizenship between National Legacies and Postnational Projects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245–69.
Eder, K., Giesen, B., Schmidtke, O. and Tambini, D. (2002) Collective Identities in Action: A Sociological Approach to Ethnicity. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Eder, K., Hellmann, K.-U. and Trenz, H.-J. (1998) ‘Regieren in Europa jenseits öffentlicher Legitimation? Einer Untersuchung zur Rolle von politischer Öffentlichkeit in Europa.’ Politische Vierteljahresschrift 29: 321–43.
Eder, K. and Kantner, C. (2000) ‘Transnationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa. Eine Kritik der Rede vom Öffentlichkeitdefizit in Europa’, in M. Bach (ed.), Transnationale Integrationsprozesse in Europa. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 306–31.
Eder, K. and Trenz, H.-J. (2003) ‘The Making of a European Public Sphere: The Case of Justice and Home Affairs’, in B. Kohler-Koch (ed.), Linking EU and National Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111–34.
Eriksen, E. O. (2005) ‘An Emerging European Public Sphere.’ European Journal of Social Theory 8(3): 341–63.
Fishkin, J. (2009) When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forst, R. (1999) ‘The Basic Right to Justification: Toward a Constructivist Conception of Human Rights.’ Constellations 6: 35–60.
Forst, R. (2011) The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fraser, N. (1992) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, in C. Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109–42.
Fraser, N. (2005) ‘Reframing Justice in a Globalised World.’ New Left Review 36: 69–88.
Fraser, N. (2007) ‘Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World.’ Theory, Culture & Society 24: 7–30.
Golding, P., Murdock, G. and Schlesinger, P. (eds.) (1986) Communicating Politics: Mass Communication and the Political Process. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Greven, M. (2007) ‘Some Considerations on Participation in Participatory Governance’, in B. Kohler-Koch and B. Rittberger (eds.), Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 233–48.
Habermas, J. (1981) Theorie des Kommunikative Handelns (2 volumes). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1989 [1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1992) Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (2005) Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (2011) Zur Verfassung Europas. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Hafez, K. and Skinner, A. (2007) The Myth of Media Globalization. Cambridge: Polity.
Kraus, P. A. (2012) ‘The Politics of Complex Diversity: A European Perspective.’ Ethnicities 12(1): 3–25.
Lord, C. (2006) ‘Democracy and the European Union: Matching Means to Standards.’ Democratization 13(4): 668–83.
Majone, G. (2009) ‘The “Referendum Threat”, the Rational Ignorant Voter and the Political Culture of the EU,’ RECON Online Working Papers, 2009/04, http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0904.pdf?fileitem= 5456014).
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1984) ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.’ American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–49.
Marcinkowski, F. (2002) ‘Politische Öffentlichkeit: Systemtheoretische Grundlagen und politikwissenschaftliche Konsequenzen’, in K.-U. Hellmann and R. Schmalz-Bruns (eds.), Theorie der Politik: Niklas Luhmanns politische Soziologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 85–108.
Meehan, E. (1997) ‘Political Pluralism and European Citizenship’, in P. Lehning and A. Weale (eds.), Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe. New York: Routledge, 69–85.
Michailidou, A., Trenz, H.-J. and de Wilde, P. (2012) ‘(W)e the Peoples of Europe: Representations of the European Union Polity during the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections on the Internet’, in T. Evas, U. Liebert and C. Lord (eds.), Multilayered Representation in the European Union: Parliaments, Courts and the Public Sphere. Wiesbaden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 215–32.
Mouffe, C. (2000) Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism.’ Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Reihe Politikwissenschaften 72.
Offe, C. (2003) Herausforderungen der Demokratie: Zur Integrations-und Leistungsfähigkeit politischer Institutionen. Frankfurt a.M. and New York: Campus.
Peters, B. (1993) Die Integration moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Peters, B. (1994) ‘Der Sinn von Öffentlichkeit,’ in F. Neidhardt (ed.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 42–76.
Risse, T. (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Salvatore, A. (2007a) The Public Sphere: Liberal Modernity, Catholicism, Islam. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Salvatore, A. (2007b) ‘The Exit from a Westphalian Framing of Political Space and the Emergence of a Transnational Islamic Public.’ Theory, Culture and Society 24(4): 41–48.
Salvatore, A. (2013) ‘New Media, the “Arab Spring”, and the Metamorphosis of the Public Sphere: Beyond Western Assumptions on Collective Agency and Democratic Politics.’ Constellations 20(2) early view http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cons.12033/full.
Schmidtke, O. (2001) ‘Trans-National Migration: A Challenge to European Citizenship Regimes.’ World Affairs 164(1): 3–16.
Schnädelbach, H. (1991) ‘The Transformation of Critical Theory: Jürgen Habermas’ The Theory of Communicative Action,’ in A. Honneth and H. Joas (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’ ‘The Theory of Communicative Action’. Cambridge: Polity, 7–22.
Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1979) Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Somers, M. (1995) ‘What’s Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation.’ Sociological Theory 13(2): 113–44.
Trenz, H.-J. (2009a) ‘In Search of a European Public Sphere: Between Normative Overstretch and Empirical Disenchantment,’ in I. Salovaara-Moring (ed.), Manufacturing Europe: Spaces of Democracy, Diversity and Communication. Göteborg: Nordicom, 35–52.
Trenz, H.-J. (2009b) ‘Digital Media and the Return of the Representative Public Sphere.’ Javnost. The Public 16(1): 33–46.
Warner, M. (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
Wimmer, A. and Glick-Schiller, N. (2003) ‘Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology.’ International Migration Review 37(3): 576–610.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Armando Salvatore, Oliver Schmidtke, and Hans-Jörg Trenz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salvatore, A., Schmidtke, O., Trenz, HJ. (2013). Introduction: Rethinking the Public Sphere Through Transnationalizing Processes: Europe and Beyond. In: Salvatore, A., Schmidtke, O., Trenz, HJ. (eds) Rethinking the Public Sphere Through Transnationalizing Processes. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283207_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283207_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44894-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28320-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)