Skip to main content

Demographic Aging as a Challenge to Modern Societies

  • Chapter
  • 331 Accesses

Abstract

This books aims to explore the challenges and the consequences of demographic aging. Population aging is not a new phenomenon. All highly developed countries, and particularly those in Europe, experienced a process of demographic aging throughout the entire twentieth century, a process that is ongoing. While in 1900 only 5 percent of the British population was 65 and over, this increased to 10.8 percent by 1950 and 15.8 percent by 2000; the share of the older population is expected to rise as high as 24.7 percent by 2050 (Phillipson, 2013, p. 12; United Nations, 2012). In Japan, where the demographic aging process over recent decades has been faster than anywhere else, people aged 65 and over now make up a quarter of the population; estimates made by the United Nations Population Division for 2050 add up to 36.5 percent. Even in the United States, whose population by Western standards is relatively young, the proportion of old people is expected to climb from 12.4 percent in 2000 to 21.4 percent in 2050 (United Nations, 2012). Other measures of population aging confirm the picture. The European median age, which divides the population into a younger and an older part of equal size, has risen from 28.9 in 1950 to 40.3 in 2010 (United Nations, 2012). At the same time, an increasing proportion of the elderly now survive into their eighties and nineties, and even become centenarians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beck, U. (2007), “Beyond Class and Nation: Reframing Social Inequalities in a Globalizing World,” British Journal of Sociology, 58, 679–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. et al. (eds) (2006), Globalization, Uncertainty and Late Careers in Society (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2011), Aging Populations, Globalization and the Labor Market. Comparing Late Working Life and Retirement in Modern Societies (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brettschneider, A. (2009), “Paradigmenwechsel als Deutungskampf. Diskursstrategien im Umbau der deutschen Alterssicherung,” Sozialer Fortschritt, 9–10, 189–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. L. (2006), “The UK Occupational Pension System in Crisis,” in H. Pemberton et al. (eds), Britain’s Pensions Crisis: History and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 145–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B. (2006), Reforming Early Retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —, and I. Schulze (2007), “Krise und Reform der Alterssicherung in Europa,” Archiv für Sozialgeschichte, 47, 269–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilleard, C., and P. Higgs (2005), Contexts of Ageing: Class, Cohort and Community (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2011), “The Third Age as a Cultural Field,” in D. Carr and K. Komp (eds), Gerontology in the Era of the Third Age: Implications and Next Steps (New York: Springer), pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerres, A. (2008a), “Reforming the Welfare State in Times of Grey Majorities. The Myth of an Opposition between Younger and Older Voters in Germany,” German Policy Studies, 4, 131–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2008b), “The Grey Vote: Determinants of Older Voters’ Party Choice in Britain and West Germany,” Electoral Studies, 27, 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009), The Political Participation of Older People in Europe. The Greying of Our Democracies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. (2006), Ageing Societies: Myths, Challenges and Opportunities (London: Hodder Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, P. (2001), “Public Support for Retirement Income Reform,” OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 55 (Paris).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • HSBC (2013), The Future of Retirement. A New Reality, UK Report (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergenerational Foundation (2013), http://www.if.org.uk, accessed May 2013.

  • Kinsella, K., and D. R. Phillips (2005), “Global Aging: The Challenge of Success,” Population Bulletin, 60, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, J. (2003), “Breite Zustimmung für Beibehaltung des Rentenniveaus auch bei steigenden Beiträgen,” ISI, 29, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, M. (1985), “Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs. Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 37, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999), “Krieg der Generationen? Die politische Macht der Älteren,” in A. Niederfranke et al. (eds), Funkkolleg Altern 2: Lebenslagen und Lebenswelten, soziale Sicherung und Altenpolitik (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag), pp. 479–514.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • — (2005), “Generational Changes and Generational Equity,” in M. L. Johnson et al. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 518–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007), “The Institutionalization of the Life Course: Looking Back to Look Ahead,” Research in Human Development, 4, 253–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2010), “Age Groups and Generations: Lines of Conflict and Potentials for Integration,” in J. C. Tremmel (ed.), A Young Generation under Pressure? The Financial Situation and the “Rush Hour” of the Cohorts 1970–1985 in a Generational Comparison (Berlin: Springer), pp. 169–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, M. et al. (eds) (1991), Time for Retirement. Comparative Studies of Early Exit from the Labor Force (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2010), “Linkages among Adult Family Generations: Evidence from Comparative Survey Research,” in P. Heady and M. Kohli (eds), Family, Kinship and State in Contemporary Europe, vol. 3: Perspectives on Theory and Policy (Frankfurt: Campus), pp. 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., and A. Mason (eds) (2011), Population Aging and the Generational Economy: A Global Perspective (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisering, L. (2004), “Paradigmen sozialer Gerechtigkeit. Normative Diskurse im Umbau des Sozialstaats,” in S. Liebig et al. (eds), Verteilungsprobleme und Gerechtigkeit in modernen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus), pp. 29–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007), “Gerechtigkeitsdiskurse im Umbau des deutschen Sozialstaats,” in S. Empter and R. B. Vehrkamp (eds), Soziale Gerechtigkeit — eine Bestandsaufnahme (Gütersloh: Bertelsmanns-Stiftung), pp. 77–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, S., and P. Scheller (2007), “Gerechtigkeit zwischen den Generationen,” Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 310–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Sherlock, P. (2011), “Ageing and International Development — A Critical View,” in L. Leisering (ed.), Die Alten der Welt. Neue Wege der Alterssicherung im globalen Norden und Süden (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag), pp. 144–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mümken, S., and M. Brussig (2012), “Alterserwerbsbeteiligung in Europa. Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich,” Altersübergangs-Report 2012–01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munnell, A. H. (2006), “Employer-Sponsored Plans: The Shift from Defined Benefit to Defined Contribution,” in G. L. Clark et al. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retirement Income (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 359–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nullmeier, F. (2004), “Der Diskurs der Generationengerechtigkeit in Wissenschaft und Politik,” in K. Burmeister and B. Böhning (eds), Generationen und Gerechtigkeit (Hamburg: VSA), pp. 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014), Stat Labour Force Statistics, http://stats.oecd.org, accessed 12 September 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeppen, J., and J. W. Vaupel (2002), “Broken Limits to Life Expectancy,” Science, 296, 1029–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, C. (2013), Ageing (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (1996), “The New Politics of the Welfare State,” World Politics, 48, 143–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2004), Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (ed.) (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno, J. (1989), “Generational Equity and the Politics of the Welfare State,” Politics & Society, 17, 353–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawnsley, A. (2006), “The Age War Is Here — and the Young are Losing It to the Old,” Observer, 21 May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. G. (2012), “Die Demokratie wird älter — Politische Konsequenzen des demographischen Wandels,” in P. Graf Kielmansegg and H. Häfner (eds), Alter und Altern. Wirklichkeiten und Deutungen (Heidelberg: Springer), pp. 163–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W., and S. Uebelmesser (2002), “Pensions and the Path to Gerontocracy in Germany,” European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (2007), “Politik in einer alternden Gesellschaft: Vom Generationenvertrag zum Generationenkonfikt?,” in P. Gruss (ed.), Die Zukunft des Alterns (München: C. H. Beck Verlag), pp. 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timonen, V. (2008), Ageing Societies: A Comparative Introduction (Maidenhead: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Torp, C. (2015), Gerechtigkeit im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Alter und Alterssicherung in Deutschland und Großbritannien von 1945 bis heute (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2012), World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker Bourne, A. et al. (2011), “Non-governmental Organizations: HelpAge International as a Global Actor,” in L. Leisering (ed.), Die Alten der Welt. Neue Wege der Alterssicherung im globalen Norden und Süden (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag), pp. 395–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K. (2010), “Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders?: Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change,” Journal of Public Policy, 30, 137–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. B., and D. M. Watts-Roy (2009), “Aging Boomers, Generational Equity, and the Framing of the Debate over Social Security,” in R. B. Hudson (ed.), Boomer Bust? Economic and Political Issues of the Graying Society, vol. 1 (Westport, CT: Praeger), pp. 153–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, D. A. (2006), “Early Retirement,” in G. L. Clark et al. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retirement Income (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 310–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1994), Averting the Old Age Crisis. A World Bank Policy Research Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Cornelius Torp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torp, C. (2015). Demographic Aging as a Challenge to Modern Societies. In: Torp, C. (eds) Challenges of Aging. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283177_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics