Skip to main content

Pacts of Embodiment: A Comparative Ethnography of Filmmakers’ Gestures

  • Chapter
Behind the Screen

Part of the book series: Global Cinema ((GLOBALCINE))

  • 1153 Accesses

Abstract

All films obliterate the production process as they take shape and generate a “black box” that is sometimes difficult to open. A simple look at the credits at the end of a film shows how many people have been involved and gives the historian clues to investigate the collective nature of filmmaking. For the ethnographer, focusing on the working gestures of filmmakers when they are devising a shot is a good way of opening the black box of the filmmaking process. They move beyond speech and seem to communicate with a sort of sign language when they want to visualize their images or explain them to others. To realize the shots they have in mind and ensure that their instructions are understood by their actors, most of them have their own way of taking production in hand, using gesticulations or manual demonstrations. On a film set, the action to be performed must be made visible to the actor, explained several times, corrected, and modified. And most of the time, this is achieved by means of relays (assistants, stand-ins) who rarely appear in the finished film. These moments of rehearsal and demonstration are always very intense but relatively difficult to describe in a simple notebook. Filming filmmakers at work seems particularly appropriate here because we can replay movements in slow motion, describe their gestures more precisely, and understand that transpose or concretize a mental image (translating a story, narrating a scenario with the help of one’s hands), those that project a shared object or whose purpose is to objectify it for others (positioning the frame, the camera movement before the take or in between takes), those that coordinate and so help to set up the take (positioning the actors, lights, accessories), and mimetic ones that reproduce an action or are supposed to be imitated that are executed by the director or his assistant in front of the actor.3

As for the fact that I work on the scenario with my collaborators and avoid letting the actors read it, that’s the result of experience. I’ve noticed that when actors can read the scenario at home in the evening, in front of a mirror, helped by family members, they adopt certain facial expressions that are absolutely not right. So, if possible, I prefer for the actors to arrive completely blank, without their own fixed idea of the character, which absolutely could not be the same as mine, or at the best of times quite different.

Federico Fellini 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Adam Kendon, Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles Goodwin, “Pointing as Situated Practice,” in Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, ed. Sotaro Kita (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003), 217–241. It would be too long to quote all the works that have investigated the role of gestures in communication studies, anthropology, and semiotics over the past 50 years. Many researchers who have considered video to be the ideal tool for “gesture studies” have tried to elucidate its role in everyday interactions, but seldom within the context of creative processes.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Erwing Goffman, Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ray Birdwhistell, Kinesics and Context. Essays on Body Motion Communication (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adam Kendon, Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Goodwin, “Professional Vision,” American Anthropologist 96, no. 3 (1994): 606–633;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ch. Goodwin, “Co-constructing Meaning in Conversations with an Aphasic Man,” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28, no. 3 (1995): 233–260;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ch. Goodwin, “Transparent Vision,” in Interaction and Grammar, eds Elinor Ochs, Emmanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 370–404;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. David McNeill, Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. McNeill, Gesture and Thought (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. See Emmanuel Grimaud, “The Film in Hand. Modes of Coordination and Assisted Virtuosity in the Bombay Film Studios,” Qualitative Sociology 3, no. 3 (2007): 59–77. This previous study was based on extensive video footage filmed between 1996 and 2001 in the Mumbai studios where I worked as an assistant director; for a detailed ethnographic account of filmmaking processes in Mumbai, see Bollywood Film Studio (Paris: CNRS Editions, 2004). In this footage, actors, directors, and assistants interact at different moments of the take. The scenes I could collect as an ethnographer displayed various degrees of organizational complexity including stunts, machinery, and choreography dance steps.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Lev Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. On the economy and organizational aspects of the Hollywood “script system,” see Janet Staiger, ed., The Studio System (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1995). On the shifting identity of the notion of script throughout film history,

    Google Scholar 

  14. see Steven Maras, Screenwriting: History, Theory, and Practice (London: Wallflower Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Grimaud, Bollywood Film Studio; Grimaud, “Les dérives du scénario: script, logiciels d’écriture et modèles de conception aléatoires au cinéma”; in Du corps au texte, approches comparatives, eds Brigitte Baptandier and Giordana Charuty (Nanterre: Société d’ethnologie, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grimaud, “The Film in Hand”; Grimaud, “L’envers de la prise de vue. Acteurs, Doublures et échafaudages gestuels dans les studios de Bombay,” in Purushartha, 29 (2011), pp. 263–290; Grimaud, “Les coulisses du sublime. Cascades de cinéma, machineries, effets spéciaux,” Ateliers d’Anthropologie 35 (2011), accessed May 20, 2013, http://ateliers.revues.org.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dadasaheb Phalke, How Films Are Prepared (Poona: National Film Archives of India, 1912). See also Paresh Mokashi’s Marathi film Harischandrachi Factory (2009), which sheds an interesting light on Phalke’s working methods in retrospect.

    Google Scholar 

  18. John Cassavetes and Raymond Carney, Cassavetes on Cassavetes (London: Faber and Faber, 2001), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Grimaud, “The Film in Hand”; Grimaud, Johar and Mehmood in Bollywood, a Film in Search of Itself (Lyon: Asiexpo, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salvador Dali and Haim Finkelstein, eds, The Collected Writings of Salvador Dalf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998): 70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Petr Szczepanik Patrick Vonderau

Copyright information

© 2013 Petr Szczepanik and Patrick Vonderau

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grimaud, E. (2013). Pacts of Embodiment: A Comparative Ethnography of Filmmakers’ Gestures. In: Szczepanik, P., Vonderau, P. (eds) Behind the Screen. Global Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282187_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics